• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 5 hours americavchina.com (otherwise known as OilPrice).
  • 25 mins Democrats through impeachment process helped Trump go out of China deal conundrum. Now Trump can safely postpone deal till after November 2020 elections
  • 8 hours Forget The Hype, Aramco Shares May be Valued At Zero Next Year
  • 23 hours Natural Gas
  • 1 hour Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 13 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
  • 1 hour POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 2 days Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 2 days Wallstreet's "acid test" for Democrat Presidential candidate to receive their financial support . . . Support "Carried Interest"
  • 4 hours READ: New Record Conoco Eagleford Vintage 5 wells, their 5th generation test wells . . . Shale going bust . . . LAUGHABLE
  • 18 hours My interview on PDVSA Petrocaribe and corruption
  • 1 day Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 2 days 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
  • 1 day Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
Alt Text

U.S. Willing To Shoot Syrian Officials To “Protect The Oil”

United States military officials reaffirmed…

Alt Text

The Saudi Pivot To The East Is Real

Saudi Arabia’s decision to shortlist…

Alt Text

Iran's President Vows Revenge For Oil Tanker Attack

Though details of Friday’s tanker…

Simon Saradzhyan

Simon Saradzhyan

Simon is a contributor to ISN Security Watch

More Info

Premium Content

State Security: A Strategic Partnership between Moscow and the West

Russia, Europe and the US should form a firm alliance against common threats, which, if not addressed together, will grow to pose grave challenges to their security.

On 9 May, soldiers from the US, the UK, France, Poland and a number of former Soviet republics  marched down the cobblestones of Moscow’s Red Square together with their counterparts from Russia to commemorate the 65th anniversary of the victory in World War II.

That soldiers from these NATO countries and Russia would parade in downtown Moscow is both unprecedented and illustrative of the potential for cooperation between Moscow and the West in the sphere of security and defense.

That potential is based on convergence of their vital interests in that:

•  No nuclear weapons or nuclear devices are ever used
•  No new nuclear powers emerge
•  No sub-state actors acquire nuclear weapons and WMD terrorism is prevented while conventional terrorism is suppressed
•  All weapons-usable nuclear material be accounted for and secured to highest standards
•  There is no armed conflict or war in Europe/Eurasia
•  No failed states emerge in Eurasia

Beyond the security domain, their vital interests will also converge in that:

•  Transnational crime and trafficking in Europe/Eurasia is suppressed
•  The viability and stability of major world markets, including that of fossil fuel, is ensured
•  Integration of Russia into the club of economically developed free market democracies continues

This list, which I have complied, is not finite, and different vertices in the polygon, which Russia and NATO members form, have varying degrees of capabilities and motivation in advancing one or another of these interests.   

Still, one cannot help wonder why, 20 years since the end of the ideological divide between West and East, the two have not only failed to form a strategic partnership, but also remain in a stand-off with thousands of nuclear warheads prepared for a quick launch.

In the meantime, new common challenges have emerged for the former Cold War foes, including the rise of non-state actors displaying sustained efforts to acquire WMDs and the possibility of  failed states in Southern and Central Asia.

For the host of the 9 May parade, this list of challenges is also complimented by such resilient threats to Russia’s national security as the insurgency in the North Caucasus. Elsewhere, the growing disparity between its economically underdeveloped and underpopulated parts of Siberia and the Far East and China is becoming a cause for serious concern in Moscow.

Europe, Russia and the US would be much better prepared to preempt common threats to their security if they acted as members of one alliance or one collective security mechanism.

One way forward to start forging such an alliance is to reform the existing system of collective security in Europe to give Moscow a meaningful say. But the US government has already rejected Russia’s proposal for a new European collective security treaty.

Another way forward is accepting Russia into NATO, which would have to be preceded by building trust and resolving all major issues of discontent between the sides, including resolution of the conflicts in the former Soviet Union.

Joint missile defense could help to end the military stand-off between the alliance and Russia and to build trust, the lack of which is especially visible in relations between Russia and a number of former Warsaw Pact countries, albeit the recent rapproachement between Moscow and Warsaw shows that the existing animosities are not irreconcilable.  

One option for addressing these countries’ concerns over Russia’s entry into NATO could be to implement the idea of William Perry and George Shultz to move from consensus decisions to super-majority decisions in the alliance’s governing structure. Russia’s ascendancy to NATO will also end Russia’s own concerns over the membership of former Soviet republics in the alliance. It would also play a useful (but not decisive) role in forging closer economic cooperation with the West to secure its assistance in diversifying and modernizing the Russian economy in what will help to address the disparities with China in the east.  

Neither the US nor Europe nor Russia can afford the status quo of the existing European collective security system, whose flaws have been exemplified by the wars in former Yugoslavia and Georgia, at a time when much more serious threats have emerged.

If not addressed together, some of these threats will expand in scale and scope in the next several decades to make the lingering suspicions and lack of institutionalized cooperation between Russia, Europe and the US look absurd and pernicious to future generations.

By. Simon Saradzhyan

Source: ISN Security Watch




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play