• 15 hours PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 17 hours Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 19 hours Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 20 hours Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 21 hours Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 22 hours Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 23 hours Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 1 day New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 1 day Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 1 day Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 1 day Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 2 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 2 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 2 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 2 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 2 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 2 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 2 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 3 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 3 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 3 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 4 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 4 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 4 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 4 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 4 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 4 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 5 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 5 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 5 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 5 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 5 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Libyan Oil May Be Slipping Out Of Putin’s Reach

Last Friday, the Benghazi Defense…

Alt Text

Who Gets Control Of Libya’s Oil As The Guns Go Silent?

The Libyan National Oil Corporation…

Defense and Foreign Affairs

Defense and Foreign Affairs

Defense and Foreign Affairs is a geopolitical news publication offered by the International Strategic Studies Association.

More Info

Nigerian Uncertainties Created by Presidential Election Ambition May Hurt Global Energy Markets

Nigerian Uncertainties Created by Presidential Election Ambition May Hurt Global Energy Markets

The apparent decision on May 11, 2010 — discreetly revealed by two Nigerian newspapers the next day — that Nigerian Pres. Dr Goodluck Jonathan would be interested in contesting the January 2011 Presidential elections may have been part of a process to “test the waters” on the incumbent President’s chances of electoral success. Whatever the motivation, the leak sent a message of concern through the global energy industry which is increasingly dependent on Nigerian — and Gulf of Guinea — oil and gas output.

Dr Jonathan’s new confidence in his belief that he could take the Presidency in his own right, after so tentatively taking the Presidency with the death of Pres. Umaru Yar’Adua, was confirmed when on the night of May 12, 2010, he appointed another inexperienced politician — at least inexperienced on the national and international stage — Governor Namadi Sambo of Kaduna State, as Vice-President-designate. With that step, and with the almost simultaneous resignation of the National Chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) Prince Vincent Ogbulafor to face corruption charges, Dr Jonathan had clearly believed that the carefully guided plans his advisors had put in place to get Nigeria moving again had given him a national power base in his own right.

Basically, Dr Jonathan was walking away from the political and governmental team which had installed him, and which had the experience to resume dealing with the major infrastructural and security crises besetting the country.

Pres. Jonathan, from Bayelsa state in the Niger Delta — the region known as the “South-South” — would, if he ran for the Presidency, usurp the understanding within his own PDP that it was the turn of the North to field a Presidential candidate. Pres. Jonathan inherited the Presidency when, during his Vice-Presidential tenure under a Northern President (Umaru Yar’Adua), the incumbent died. Dr Jonathan’s move could well split the PDP, but now necessarily down the middle. He may find himself with a splinter of the party.

Moreover, Pres. Jonathan does not have a national power base on his own, or even a real track record at a national level. His experience in regional and international affairs has been limited, essentially, to attending — as Acting President — US Pres. Barack Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) in Washington, DC, in April 2010. Nigerian media have been using his one “photo-op” with Pres. Obama since then to show Pres. Jonathan’s international “credentials”.

What went unnoticed by the Nigerian media was the fact that the Obama White House did not, in fact, treat him as a VIP or vital ally of the US, but lectured him on election reform. At the same time, Acting Pres. Jonathan did not heed the advice of experienced Nigerian Washington hands as to how to phrase his remarks to the US policy community, and in a brief remark, and subsequent questions and answers, to the US Council on Foreign Relations, pushed an agenda which was more suited to a Nigerian rather than a US audience.

Given the indication that Pres. Jonathan would probably contest the January 2011 election, his choice of Vice-President, which should have been announced at the latest on May 11, 2010, was still not announced until late on May 12, 2010. But the indications of the probability of a Presidential bid at the elections by Dr Jonathan almost certainly indicated to observers that the Vice-Presidency would go to a cipher candidate, probably one of the PDP state governors who were on a short-list of candidates. That proved to be the case.

What this means is that Pres. Jonathan was about to lose some of the key power brokers who literally put him in office, getting him from the governorship of Bayelsa (and its record, even under his own term, of extensive corruption) to the Vice-Presidency, and then to the Acting Presidency, and subsequently to the Presidency. These officials feel that Dr Jonathan has now become too ambitious and too disloyal, moving his own — and his wife’s — desires ahead of the country’s needs or expectations.

One source noted: “Dr Jonathan needed another few years of experience in dealing with national and international issues. He is a long way from being ready for the Presidency, and his completion of the Yar’Adua tenure until 2011 would only have been productive, in a real sense, if he retained the support of the really professional insiders who had supported him. Now, it appears as though he is going back to the Yar’Adua model of governance, worrying only about making money for himself and his family and ignoring the crisis in the country, and even his own Niger Delta region.”

The result is likely to be that the security situation in the Niger Delta could get worse in the run-up to the January 2011 elections, impacting the security of oil and gas production, and therefore throwing a measure of uncertainty into global energy markets.

Analysis by Defense & Foreign Affairs GIS Station Abuja, and other sources.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on May 13 2010 said:
    very wrong assesment of Jonathan and the prevailing mood in the nation that favours and clamours for a Jonathan presidency.
  • Anonymous on May 14 2010 said:
    Even though I am from the South-South, I will not vote for Jonathan because he got to where he is today because of the arrangement of PDP and cannot turn against their arrangement of South then North and so on simply because he got to the presidency as a result of the death of Yaradua. He does not even have a base in the South South not to talk of other parts of the country.
  • Anonymous on May 15 2010 said:
    the analysis is very wrong. are u implying that nigeria should continue to be run by few political juganuts? thesame people that imposed both Obasanjo and Yaradua on us? who do they think they are? let them go run thier homes. I must vote for change... Vote Dr Jonathan. Besides, the PDP accord is wrong. we have North, East, West and South-South... any meaningful accord should have those regions. period

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News