• 4 minutes Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 7 minutes Amount of Oil Usage in the United States
  • 10 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 4 hours Something wicked this way comes
  • 14 hours Tesla Battery Day (announcements on technology)
  • 4 hours Kalifornistan, CO2, clueless politicians, climate hustle
  • 27 mins JP Morgan Christyan Malek, report this Summer .. . We are at beginning of oil Super Cycle and will see $190 bbl Brent by 2025. LOL
  • 12 hours Natural Gas Saves Southern California From Blackouts
  • 8 hours Why NG falling n crude up?
  • 3 hours .
  • 2 hours Famine, Economic Collapse of China on the Horizon?
  • 2 days US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 1 day Ten Years of Plunging Solar Prices
  • 2 days Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
The U.S. Is Ramping Up Its Wind Power Production

The U.S. Is Ramping Up Its Wind Power Production

Wind power is increasing in…

Warren Buffett’s Secret For Super Cheap Energy

Warren Buffett’s Secret For Super Cheap Energy

Warren Buffett’s wind turbines have…

Is Wind Energy The Most Stable Renewables Investment?

Is Wind Energy The Most Stable Renewables Investment?

Offshore wind power offers great…

Professor Chris Rhodes

Professor Chris Rhodes

Professor Chris Rhodes is a writer and researcher. He studied chemistry at Sussex University, earning both a B.Sc and a Doctoral degree (D.Phil.); rising to…

More Info

Premium Content

Britain Going All out for Wind Power

Britain has decided to go all-out for wind-power. On Thursday, I flew over the massive off-shore Thanet wind-farm - one of the largest in the UK - in the English Channel off Foreness Point. The farm consists of 100 turbines, each over 300ft high, and is expected to power over 200,000 homes. It will increase the amount of energy generated from offshore wind in the UK by one third to 1,314MW. Opened in September, the Thanet wind-farm was built by the Swedish Vattenfall energy company, and increases the number of large scale off-shore British turbines to 436, to be compared with 2,640 based on land.

Not everyone is convinced that wind-power is the most reliant route to clean, renewable carbon-free energy, and it is concerning that Britain is relying on a power source that must be backed up by more constant technologies such as nuclear, coal, or gas, because the wind blows inconsistently, as is its nature. A mere 2% of Britain's electricity was produced from renewable sources in 2002, but it is hoped that this should rise to 10% by the end of the year in light of the new wind-power generating capacity. There are further cost issues in upgrading the national grid to cope with power-surges and the need to switch between different power sources.

It should be noted that electricity provides only around one third of the total energy used in the U.K, and the bulk of that is accounted for by heating and transportation, which is supplied by respectively coal/gas and oil based fuels. Hence the UK will have its work cut out if it is to meet a EU target to raise its overall energy provision from renewables from the present 5% to 15% by 2020.

The actualization of an overall wind-power strategy is not going smoothly, however, and the number of new wind-farms coming on-stream has fallen by 30%, in part as a consequence of the recession. There has also been a fall in the past 12 months by 50% in planning approvals for wind-farms in England, a situation that is also reflected in Scotland. There is also considerable opposition to wind-turbines which are perceived as unsightly and noisy, as is reflected by the 230-odd campaign groups that operate across the whole of the U.K.

Indeed, some of these groups advocate nuclear power as a better option than wind, a situation that would have been almost unthinkable ten years ago. It was estimated in 2008 that to meet the U.K. wind-power goal by 2020 would require building one new turbine every day for the next twelve years. Since progress so far has fallen far short of this rate of conversion, little confidence is lent that the nation will be able to keep its promise on renewables.

By. Professor Chris Rhodes

Professor Chris Rhodes is a writer and researcher. He studied chemistry at Sussex University, earning both a B.Sc and a Doctoral degree (D.Phil.); rising to become the youngest professor of physical chemistry in the U.K. at the age of 34.
A prolific author, Chris has published more than 400 research and popular science articles (some in national newspapers: The Independent and The Daily Telegraph)
He has recently published his first novel, "University Shambles" was published in April 2009 (Melrose Books).
http://universityshambles.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on November 12 2010 said:
    Nuclear power is so much better than wind power for producing large scale electricity, that the two approaches do not even belong on the same page.Wind power in England may be in a bubble presently, but that bubble will soon collapse.
  • Anonymous on November 13 2010 said:
    Tell them about it, Alfonso. I didn't think much of Tony Blair in the last few years of his 'reign', but he once said that if you are serious about obtaining inexpensive and reliable energy, you cannot turn your back on nuclear energy. Thank you Mr Blair.Alfonso is correct. This investment doesn't make economic sense. But, of course, almost everything that Vattenfall has a hand in doesn't make sense for consumers of energy, although things have worked out very well for their execútives since the deregulation of electricity in Sweden.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News