• 4 minutes The Federal Reserve and Money...Aspects which are not widely known
  • 8 minutes How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 12 minutes  What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
  • 15 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days European Parliament Members, Cristian Terhes et al, push back against Totalitarian Digital ID and Carbon Tyranny in Europe.
  • 2 days Once seen as fleeting, a new solar tech proves its lasting power
  • 6 days "How Long Will The Epic Rally In Energy Stocks Last?" by Tsvetana Paraskova at OILPRICE.COM
  • 4 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in

Breaking News:

Oil Should Stay In Triple Digits: Analyst

Why Aren’t Wind Stocks Soaring?

Why Aren’t Wind Stocks Soaring?

Wind energy is supposed to…

2022 Will Be A Critical Year For Wind Power

2022 Will Be A Critical Year For Wind Power

Wind power was once the…

Green Futures

Green Futures

This article originally appeared in Green Futures magazine. Green Futures is the leading international magazine on environmental solutions and sustainable futures, published by Forum for…

More Info

Premium Content

Bladeless Turbine: The Future of Wind Energy?

The Saphonian turbine is more efficient, quieter and safer for birds, its makers claim. Could it represent the future of wind energy?

Innovation always pushes boundaries, but what about pushing the laws of physics? Tunisian start-up Saphon Energy claims it can do exactly that with the Saphonian, a bladeless turbine that harvests more energy from the wind than previously thought possible.

The makers claim that the turbine exceeds Betz’ Law, which caps the amount of kinetic energy that a turbine can harvest at 59.3% of the wind’s total energy.

“The basic idea is that you can’t take all the energy out, because the air would stop moving”, says Ken Caldeira, a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution for Science.

The Saphonian replaces the blades and rotor with a concave disk. The wind pushes on it in a “back-and-forth 3D knot motion”, explains Hassine Labaied, Saphon’s CEO. The kinetic energy of the wind is first converted to mechanical energy via pistons (connected to the disk), then to hydraulic energy, and then to electricity. Labaied claims to have “very promising results”, showing the turbine is 2.3 times more efficient than a bladed turbine – a level of efficiency that would put it above Betz’ limit.

Related Article: Rural Alaska Shows us the Way for Wind Energy Installations

But not everyone is convinced. Caldeira described the claim as “wacky”. The company plans to address such skepticisms in a detailed demonstration that will be published later in the year.

Whether or not the questions over the turbine’s efficiency are resolved, other advantages it offers are undisputed. It’s quieter than standard turbines, and doesn’t pose a threat to birds.

But its cutting edge will likely be its lower cost. Saphon expects total investment costs to be 30-45% below that of current turbines, since the most expensive parts – the blades and the gearbox – have been replaced with less expensive plastics, fabrics and a hydraulic motor.

That’s an advantage that even Caldeira would be willing to embrace. “The efficiency of extraction is not the issue right now”, he says: “It’s really if you can do it cheaper.”

By. John Eischeid


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Ken Caldeira on November 26 2012 said:
    "The makers claim that the turbine exceeds Betz’ Law, which caps the amount of kinetic energy that a turbine can harvest at 59.3% of the wind’s total energy."

    I am a climate scientist and not in a position to offer an informed engineering assessment of any class of turbine technology. It is possible that the Saphonian turbine is a marvelous piece of creative engineering.

    Nevertheless, the laws of physics prevail.

    Perhaps someone in Saphon is misapplying "Betz limit",for example, by referring to blade [or sail etc] area instead of swept area.

    If the Betz Limit is wrong then at least one equation on this page is wrong: http://www.wind-power-program.com/betz.htm

    Which equation is wrong?

    If Betz was wrong, why isn't the Wikipedia page updated?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betz'_law

    Physics will win out over rhetoric.

    Ken Caldeira 25 Nov 2012

    http://dge.stanford.edu/labs/caldeiralab/

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News