• 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 8 minutes The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 11 minutes China Raids Bank and Investor Accounts
  • 8 hours Sources confirm Trump to sign two new Executive orders.
  • 1 day CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 17 hours No More Love: Kanye West Breaks With Trump, Claims 2020 Run Is Not A Stunt
  • 23 hours In a Nutshell...
  • 2 hours Better Days Are (Not) Coming: Fed Officials Suggest U.S. Recovery May Be Stalling
  • 1 day A Real Reality Check on "Green Hydrogen"
  • 18 hours During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 2 days Why Oil could hit $100
  • 7 hours Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 2 days Why Wind is pitiful for most regions on earth
  • 15 hours Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
Should Tesla Give Up On Solar?

Should Tesla Give Up On Solar?

Tesla’s new solar installations dropped…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Premium Content

Thin-Film Solar Panels, Riding Out the Turbulence

Thin-film solar is attractive for a number of reasons; from the fact that it is more environmentally friendly to produce, to the low cost of manufacturing these much lighter weight and less bulky cousins of the traditional solar panel. But only the fittest are surviving in this niche market of highly sophisticated technology and constant innovation.

Thin-film solar panels are manufactured using solution-based, low-temperature, roll-to-roll procedures that apply conventional printing techniques to flexible materials that can easily be incorporated into buildings and other structures. They are manufactured using copper, indium, gallium and selenium, rather than from silicon, cadmium and tellurium, which is used in conventional solar panel production. 

The latest industry victim is Konarka, which filed for bankruptcy after having raised more than $150 million in funding since 2001, plus at least $10 million in loans over the past decade, including a $1.5 million state loan backed by Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Late last week, the company said it had failed to obtain additional financing and had no alternative to a full liquidation and asset sale to pay off creditors.

Aside from Konarka, at least 13 thin-film solar panel manufacturers in the US have filed for bankruptcy this year.
In the meantime, thin-film solar panel manufacturing is being eyed by the Chinese, who appreciate the low-cost production and have plenty of space to install these larger, though less bulky panels.

Earlier this year, China’s LDK solar group announced it planned to acquire German panel maker Sunways, which produces thin-film panels. In June, China’s privately owned Hanergy likewise announced plans to acquire another European thin-film solar panel producer, Solibro, a subsidiary of Q-Cells, which filed for insolvency in April. 

But this is not the death knell for thin-film panels by any means, it’s just a test which only the innovatively fittest will survive. While Konarka and others have failed, California solar panel maker Nanosolar Inc. announced on 1 June that it had managed to raise $70 million in venture capital to commercialize its innovative solar panels.

Nanosolar appears to have the edge on innovation necessary to attract continued investment. According to NASDAQ, Nanosolar’s new venture capital is coming from Mohr Davidow Ventures, OnPoint Technologies Inc., Ohana Holdings LLC and European private-equity investors “who refer to themselves as international family offices because they include families who use their wealth to invest in companies”.

So, while Konarka files for bankruptcy, Nanosolar is optimistic despite falling prices and global oversupply. Nanosolar has its sights set on expanding its manufacturing operations to 115 megawatts of capacity, along with some hearty research and development to improve its technology.

Incidentally, the failure of Konarka is not likely to be altogether grieved by President Obama, who had come under fierce attack over the failure of the administration-backed Solyndra solar giant in 2011. It will be lost on few that Konarka was backed very explicitly by Romney, who has led the attacks on the Obama renewable energy campaign.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com

Jen Alic is a geopolitical analyst, co-founder of ISA Intel in Sarajevo and Tel Aviv, and the former editor-in-chief of ISN Security Watch in Zurich.


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • MineMan on June 05 2012 said:
    At least Obama was smart enmough not to risk his own money in a very risky business. Romney collects more interest per day than he lost in this investment.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News