• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 7 mins Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 17 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 3 hours Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 1 hour Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 5 hours Asia Oil Refiners Mull Run Cuts With Margins At 16 yrs. Low For Season
  • 3 hours Trump bogged down in Mideast quagmire. US spent $Trillions, lost Thousands of lives, and lost goodwill. FOR WHAT? US interests ? WHAT INTEREST ? . . . . China greatest threat next 50 years.
  • 9 hours Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 3 hours Why is Strait of Hormuz the World's Most Important Oil Artery
  • 28 mins Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 3 hours Misunderstanding between USA and Iran the cause of current stand off, I call BS
  • 3 hours ARAMCO BOARD: Former Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris: I want to help Saudi Arabia become a 21st century economy
  • 5 hours IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 5 hours IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
Alt Text

Solar Stocks Are Booming This Year

The solar industry is on…

Alt Text

India Surges Ahead In Global Solar Race

India is soaring past the…

Michael McDonald

Michael McDonald

Michael is an assistant professor of finance and a frequent consultant to companies regarding capital structure decisions and investments. He holds a PhD in finance…

More Info

Trending Discussions

The World’s First 24/7 Solar Power Plant

Solar Power’s biggest problem is predictably simple – the sun does not shine all the time. To combat this issue, power companies have traditionally relied on peaker power plants to supply electricity at times when demand is high but solar generation is not available – such as in the evening.

Another alternative is to use grid-scale battery storage from the firms like Tesla. But that market, while potentially game-changing, is still in its infancy. There is a less well-known third alternative though that is toiling away in the Nevada desert – thermal solar.

Solar Reserve recently unveiled a thermal solar plant set in the middle of the Nevada desert which will supply power for roughly 75,000 homes. The plant operates by using more than 10,000 mirrors arrayed around a 640 foot central tower. The tower holds more than 3 million gallons of liquid salt which is heated to a balmy 500+ degrees by the solar array and then used to heat water which in turn becomes steam and spins a turbine. Related: Crude Crushed As Production Freeze Hopes Thaw

The whole project cost slightly under $1 billion and Solar Reserve holds a 25-year contract to supply power to NV Energy for $135 per megawatt hour. The tower produces 110 megawatts of energy for 12 hours a day according to the company, which works out to roughly 1 million megawatts per year. This in turn implies a gross ROA of ~13.5% (before SG&A expenses) – not bad as investments go.

Still, it’s less clear if thermal solar will be a long-term solution. At present natural gas prices, a new natural gas plant can supply power for around $52 per megawatt-hour. Solar Reserve’s deal with NV Energy was signed several years ago when natural gas prices were much steeper. In today’s climate, even with the environmental benefits, it’s less clear if the deal would still be done. Related: Saudi Policy Tied to Weak Economy

Nonetheless, the plant is noteworthy for what it accomplishes – it is the first truly 24-7 solar plant in the world. For many applications that is a very big deal. Having to build a second power plant to back up a solar array is not an ideal solution to say the least. Thermal solar resolves that issue all while letting facilities like Solar Reserve’s store 1,100 megawatt-hours of energy.

The other benefit to thermal solar is that it does not rely on any type of fuel to generate power. As a result, it should be a good source of energy in niche applications and in areas where conventional fuels are very expensive. For instance, in Japan natural gas is much pricier than in the U.S., which until recently had led the country to be an avid user of nuclear power. Since the Fukushima disaster though, Japan has turned away from nuclear, which may leave thermal solar as an attractive option. Similarly, in places like France and Spain which already have robust solar incentives, thermal solar may be an attractive addition to the renewables portfolio. Related: As Net-Long Positions Near Records, Is The Oil Rally Overdone?

All things considered, thermal solar is probably too expensive to become a wide spread mainstream source of power – the industry seems to be moving away from the type of large megaproject that thermal solar would entail given upfront capital costs. In addition, the plant has only just begun operations, which means there is certainly a proving period that is needed to show that the technology works on a commercial scale without hiccups reliably day after day and week after week. If thermal solar can achieve that kind of reliability though, then over time it might become an attractive supplemental source of renewable energy.

By Michael McDonald of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • EdBCN on April 03 2016 said:
    I think you're underestimating the potential of this technology. If they can really produce fully dispatchable, clean power at $135/mWh with 1100 megawatt-hours of storage thrown in free, there could be a really big market for that. The cost is dependable, unlike gas or coal. And if this pioneering plant can do this for $135, there should be a lot of room for cost reductions going foreward. I think its biggest downside is that it is difficult to site. It needs a lot of space a long way from people, and a lot of sun. Not every country has a big open desert.
  • Jim Decker on April 03 2016 said:
    They can't produce power for $135 mWh. The plant revenue is $135 million on an investment of $1 billion. This is basically a source of steam to run a generator. Subtract operations, maintenance, depreciation, interest on the $1 billion, taxes- OK forget taxes- we can't expect the Democrat's favored projects to actually pay any taxes. You get the idea. The output is twice as expensive as a natural gas fired generator and it will lose money by the truck load.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News