• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 1 min Yesterday Angela Merkel stopped Trump technology war on China – the moral of the story is do not eavesdrop on ladies with high ethical standards
  • 3 hours China's Blueprint For Global Power
  • 8 hours IMO 2020:
  • 10 hours World Stocks Drop And Futures Tread Water After China Reports Worst GDP Growth In 30 Years
  • 18 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 18 hours ABC of Brexit, economy wise, where to find sites, links to articles ?
  • 3 hours Brexit agreement
  • 14 hours Why did Aramco Delay IPO again ? It's Not Always What It Seems.
  • 51 mins The Ultimate Heresy: Technology Can't Fix What's Broken
  • 18 hours Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, Ukraine Oil & Gas exploration company Burisma, and 2020 U.S. election shenanigans
  • 11 hours Deepwater GOM Project Claims Industry First
  • 19 hours PETROLEUM for humanity 
Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria Gonzalez

Gloria is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

Premium Content

US Targets China in Renewables Subsidies

The US government’s case against China for allegedly violating international trade law in its support of its wind sector focuses on the one allegation that’s easiest to pursue because it appears to be a blatant violation of trade rules, experts said.

US Trade Representative (USTR) Ron Kirk last month announced the US has requested consultations with China under the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) dispute settlement provisions, regarding China’s special fund for wind power manufacturing. Under the program, China apparently provides subsidies prohibited under WTO rules because the grants seem contingent on Chinese manufacturers using parts and components made in China.

The size of the individual grants range between $6.7 million and $22.5 million. USTR estimates that grants provided under this programme since 2008 could total several hundred million dollars.

“Import substitution subsidies are particularly harmful and inherently trade distorting, which is why they are expressly prohibited under WTO rules,” Kirk said. “These subsidies effectively operate as a barrier to US exports to China.”

Under WTO rules, the US does not have to demonstrate that these types of subsidies are damaging the US clean energy sector, but only needs to prove that the subsidies exist, said Walter Spak, a partner and head of the international trade group of law firm White & Case.

“These kinds of subsidies are an easier target in that regard,” he said.

In October, the USTR launched an investigation into China’s support of its clean energy sector under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, in response to a petition filed by the union United Steelworkers (USW). The petition accused the Chinese government of violating WTO rules, such as restricting access to critical materials, discriminating against foreign firms and goods, and establishing trade-distorting domestic subsidies.

The USTR has not been able to verify or build on claims regarding the other practices and policies covered in the USW petition, but Kirk’s office was able to make progress on some of the other allegations through its bilateral engagement with China.

In mid-December, China agreed to modify its criteria by no longer requiring foreign enterprises to have prior experience supplying equipment to large-scale wind projects in China, in response to a USW complaint that the requirement discriminated against US firms.

China also informed the US that two additional subsidy programmes identified by the USW have been terminated.

The USTR will continue to investigate the remaining USW allegations even though no formal action is being taken under the Section 301 statute. If the USTR develops sufficient evidence to support the allegations, it will pursue enforcement of US rights at the WTO independent of Section 301, Kirk said.

“My impression was the Obama administration pursued the one charge most likely to be found to violate WTO-rules and isn’t likely to bring dispute settlement proceedings on other issues for the time being,” said Jake Colvin, vice-president for global trade issues and climate change policy at the Washington, DC-based National Foreign Trade Council. “Some of the issues in the petition have already gone away, and the administration did a good job getting China to commit to reform other policies through bilateral diplomacy, which is an often-overlooked aspect of trade relations.”

By. Gloria Gonzalez

Source: Environmental-Finance




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on February 10 2011 said:
    It is true that import substitution subsidies are particularly harmful and inherently trade distorting, which is why they are expressly prohibited under rules WTO World Trade Organization’s. So it should be These subsidies effectively operate as a barrier to US exports to China.” international trade

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play