• 4 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 7 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 11 minutes Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 14 mintues NIGERIAN CRUDE OIL
  • 5 hours UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 2 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 5 hours Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 15 hours German Carmakers Warning: Hard Brexit Would Be "Fatal"
  • 50 mins Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 2 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 3 hours What will Saudi Arabia say? Booming Qatar-Turkey Trade To Hit $2 bn For 2018
  • 12 mins Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 17 hours WSJ: Gun Ownership on Rise in Europe After Terror Attacks, Sexual Assaults
  • 15 hours How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 1 min Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 1 day Solid-State Batteries
  • 18 hours Trump inclined to declare national emergency if talks continue to stall - Twitter hides this as "sensitive material"
  • 23 hours Orphan Wells
Alt Text

The Solar Tech Flying Under The Radar

Though Tesla’s Solar Roof tiles…

Alt Text

IEA: Renewables Set For Explosive Growth

The IEA sees strong growth…

Alt Text

The Overlooked Giant In Renewables

The IEA expects renewable energy…

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel J. Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer and political analyst based in Michigan. His work on matters related to the geopolitical aspects of the global energy sector,…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Transportation Sector isn't Driving Green Economy

Europe in the age of austerity is slashing subsidies for renewable energy programs. The IEA argues that as renewables become more affordable, government support is waning. This trend suggests at least parts of the economy are starting to witness a sea change in how governments are fueling growth. With the share of renewables in the global energy mix increasing, the playing field with hydrocarbons is becoming more even. But until those trends start to spill over to the transportation sector, global ambitions for a low-carbon economy may be stifled.

The International Energy Agency expects renewable energy to account for more than 30 percent of global electricity production by 2035. This would represent more than a 10 percent increase from current levels. Maria van der Hoeven, executive director of the IEA, credits much of that momentum with government incentives. Solar power, for example, is backed to the point that it started something of a trade war between Beijing and Western economies.

But those subsidies are disappearing. Madrid's decision to slash subsidies this year in a budget-cutting measure pushed Spain out of the renewable energy Top 10.  Germany, on pace to become Europe's renewable energy leader, is cutting its support for solar energy by 30 percent and Britain, Italy and Switzerland are all considering similar action. Van der Hoeven, however, notes this isn't so much about waning support for renewables as it is a sign that renewables are "coming of age."

That may very well be, but the renewable energy debate thus far has focused mostly on electricity. By some measurements, electricity use accounts for roughly 30 percent of global energy consumption. Transportation accounts for much of the rest. Van der Hoeven notes that while $66 billion of the government incentives were backing renewable energy in 2010, that represented only 20 percent of the $409 billion spent on fossil fuels that same year. That suggests the global economy is still driven largely by oil and most of that oil, about 70 percent, goes toward the transportation sector.

If renewable are truly coming of age, as Van der Hoeven suggests, then some of that subsidy-backed price reduction should spill over to automobiles. The much-lauded Chevy Volt still runs around $30,000, however. In the United States, most consumers would rather purchase a heavy-duty pick-up truck that gets around 20 miles-per-gallon for about $7,000 less than the Volt, tax incentives be damned. And, horsepower aside, the 1908 Ford Model-T got around 28 mpg. While to some extent, that's comparing apples to oranges, it also highlights a flaw in green-energy logic. Why throw the most political weight behind the part of the economy that uses up the least amount of oil?

If there's anything that $4 gasoline teaches those of us wading through the U.S. economy it's that at some point, consumers start to think greener than they do with $3.50 gasoline. Until that mindset changes and consumers start wondering why they're still using the same basic technology to get around that they did more than 100 years ago, the economy will still drive on oil.

By. Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • Marvin Pirila on March 28 2012 said:
    Mr. Graeber has missed the point that governments are selling green energy as the fix all to all of our energy needs. People that want green will buy it whether it is subsidized or not, because it fills a desire of theirs. The mainstream media miss the point that shale plays of oil and natural gas will change everything in favor of staying the course with fossil fuels.

    Global warming is a hoax being used to sway the masses to alternative energies. Studies show that the global temperatures have actually declined in the last 10 years, the ice has returned to its greatest level since it started being recorded (about 30 years), and history has shown that temperature has preceded higher carbon rates. Why? The ocean is a large heat sink that releases greater amounts of carbon in warmer periods.

    Experts are suggesting that all of the world's efforts to curb carbon will do nothing more than change levels by very small fractions of a percent. These efforts will lead to no measurable difference whatsoever. In fact, Canada pulled out of the Kyota agreement because they called it a hoax.

    We are being misled into believing that we are destroying the planet via carbon, when there simply is no proof to support their claims.

    The Chevy Volt will never succeed because lithium gets very hot and unstable. This is a government subsidized train wreck, just like ethanol. Quit all subsidies and let all products compete in the free market. If they weren't propped up by subsidies and government/media propagana, the right course of energy use would be taken.
  • Eric on March 29 2012 said:
    Why isn't the U.S. pushing or subsidizing the "big three" auto manufacturers to build vehicles running on natural gas. As far as I can tell, this would be a fantastic transition stone to use while we are still developing totally renewable energy. Natural gas burns almost entirely clean, so emissions are dramatically reduced over gas or diesel engines. And at the same time, it is a fraction of the cost. I wish the Obama would explain why Brazil and Australia are using a technology that we are for some reason not even talking about.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News