• 4 minutes Pompeo: Aramco Attacks Are An "Act Of War" By Iran
  • 7 minutes Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 15 minutes Experts review Saudi damage photos. Say Said is need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 2 hours Let's shut down dissent like The Conversation in Australia
  • 3 hours Ethanol is the SAVIOR of the Oil Industry, Convenience Store Industry, Automotive Supply Chain Industry and Much More!
  • 6 hours One of the fire satellite pictures showed what look like the fire hit outside the main oil complex. Like it hit storage or pipeline facility. Not big deal.
  • 3 hours Saudi State-of-Art Defense System looking the wrong way. MBS must fire Defense Minister. Oh, MBS is Defense Minister. Forget about it.
  • 5 hours Trump Accidentally Discusses Technology Used In The Border Wall
  • 1 hour Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 19 hours Drone attacks cause fire at two Saudi Aramco facilities, blaze now under control
  • 12 hours Donald Trump Proposes Harnessing Liberal Tears To Provide Clean Energy
  • 12 hours Saudis Buying Oil From Iraq
  • 12 hours Saudis Confirm a Cruise Missile from Iranian Origin
  • 3 hours Hong Kong protesters appeal to Trump for support.
  • 1 day China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 1 day Democrats and Gun Views
Alt Text

Big Oil To Seal Record Number Of Green Energy Deals In 2019

The world’s biggest oil companies…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Must Drop Sharply To Compete With EVs

The long-term breakeven oil price needs to…

Alt Text

European Carmakers Face Perfect Storm

Much stricter emission caps, high…

SciDev SciDev

SciDev SciDev

SciDev.Net – the Science and Development Network – is a not-for-profit organisation dedicated to providing reliable and authoritative information about science and technology for the…

More Info

Premium Content

The Hype Surrounding Grass as an Alternative Energy Source

The world is facing an energy crisis. The greenhouse effect, caused by the burning of fossil fuels, has aroused serious concerns among scientists and politicians. Some have turned to the hope seemingly offered by biological sources of energy. But are they really the solution? One type of biomass, “energy grasses”, which are grown specifically for power generation, have been widely touted and have received widespread media attention. But the claims about energy grass crops have been exaggerated, and the reality is not as miraculous as it first sounds. 

Let’s start by taking a look at the nature of biomass energy, the first type of fuel ever used by humans, which is in fact solar energy that has been collected and stored in greenery as carbohydrates. In a very wide sense, biomass could include plants, animals and microorganisms – even coal, oil and natural gas were formed from the biomass of earlier geological eras. But nowadays biomass energy is taken to mean plant oils, straw, wood chips, bark, branches and algae. 

Half a million different plant species store solar energy through photosynthesis. A practical source of energy, however, should be fast-growing, easy to harvest and transport, as well as able to photosynthesise efficiently with a large leaf area. There are three ways that plants can store this energy: the C3, C4 and CAM photosynthesis pathways. C4 is the most efficient, and it is found in sugarcane, corn and sorghum. 

Tropical rain forests are the world’s biggest natural biomass producers, creating 35 tonnes of biomass per hectare every year. But artificial conditions, such as high-density planting with fertilisers and watering, can increase yields further. Shandong Agricultural University has managed to produce an annual yield of 66 tonnes of biomass per hectare of maize and wheat. Any energy grass would need to utilise the highly efficientC4 photosynthesis pathway, and would involve large quantities of fertiliser and water in order to grow quickly and densely.

According to media reports, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University’s energy grass crop has been treated to coexist with beneficial bacteria, and brings a harvest of 105 tonnes of biomass per hectare; enough to generate as much electricity as three to four tonnes of coal. 

This type of grass has been referred to as “bacteria grass”, though this means little to a scientist. Judging from reports, it is likely to be a plant utilising the C4 photosynthesis process and inoculated with some kind of bacteria that improves its absorption of nutrients. In the natural world, there are a wide range of relationships, competitive and symbiotic, between organisms. The fungus found on the roots of legumes, which fixes nitrogen from the soil, is a classic example of symbiosis. There are few examples of grasses and bacteria coexisting in this way, but artificial inoculation could create one. Increasing absorption of nutrients would make no difference to the efficiency of photosynthesis, however, which means the claims of such large yields seem unlikely when compared with the previous record of 66 tonnes. Perhaps such yields could be found in tropical regions, if one planted three crops a year and used large amounts of fertiliser and machinery. But the energy inputs required in the fertiliser and other work would offset the original goal of replacing fossil fuels. 

Unlike agricultural crops, energy grass is quick growing; it can be harvested repeatedly; and it can be cultivated on otherwise unproductive land, which means it will not compete with food crops for arable land. However, energy grass suffers the same disadvantages as the straw produced from agricultural crops: sources are geographically scattered and harvesting costs are high. Without transportation infrastructure, electricity, water, fertiliser and machinery, such large harvests would be difficult to achieve on unproductive land. Moreover, “unproductive land” is actually home to natural vegetation and important for biodiversity. China’s ecosystems are already facing large-scale degradation; we cannot sacrifice the environment for profit. 

Experts from China Agricultural University produced a list of potential candidates that was more scientific than the exaggerated marketing claims I have mentioned. Their suggestions for “energy grasses” include annual, biannual or perennial grass and shrubs, especially tall plants such as sweet sorghum, willow and miscanthus, which are tolerant to arid and saline conditions and can grow in unproductive and mountainous regions. This inspired Beijing’s municipal government to launch plantations producing ethanol in the districts of Changping and Daxing. Even so, results in arid and semi-arid regions will be limited by environmental factors, and are unlikely to live up to the hopes of the experts. 

Grass crops may be able to help relieve the energy crisis to a certain extent, but its potential failings need more scrutiny. Large-scale planting could still end up competing with food crops, especially if there are profits to be made, and this could have a serious impact on food security. 

At the same time, we are ignoring the 700 million tonnes of straw produced in China every year, which is currently burned off in the fields, wasting energy and creating air pollution. There is no point not using this straw, while planting energy grass crops elsewhere. Scientists and governments must exercise caution when approaching the claims about energy grass crops.

Source: SciDev

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on November 23 2010 said:
    I am a political conservative and worked in the energy biz most of my like (not just adult).Meaning I am not an eco-whacko, Warmer, fish kissing bunny lover. ButWe are really quite screwed.We but the farm on our current system and overextended.Old Thomas Malthus will have his day in the end.It will be like Karma and Gravity.RED.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play