• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 9 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 15 mins Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 3 mins How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
Southeast Asia Is Betting Big on a Green Future

Southeast Asia Is Betting Big on a Green Future

Southeast Asian countries are heavily…

U.S. Attracts Europe’s Beleaguered Solar Companies

U.S. Attracts Europe’s Beleaguered Solar Companies

The unfolding situation poses a…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Tesla: ‘False Profits’ and a Bullish Market

Tesla: ‘False Profits’ and a Bullish Market

It’s been a great year for Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA), which everyone’s eyeing for a takeover: the company’s stock is up 194% this year, it’s recorded its first ever quarterly profits, and it just paid off a government loan nine years early.

It’s even earned itself the moniker “America’s fourth automaker”. Shareholders are ecstatic and potential investors are increasingly bullish—but there’s another story here, if you dissect the financials.

So Tesla just released its Q1 2013 financials, showing its first profit: net income of $11 million on total revenues of $562 million. However, that profit was not on its core product—electric vehicles—but on its sale of emissions offset credits. It earned $68 million on the sale of Zero-Emission Vehicle credits, courtesy of the state of California, and $17 million on the sale of greenhouse gas emission credits.

It also had a couple more tricks up its sleeve, including $11 million in “earnings” from warrant liability reversals and $7 million through foreign currency adjustments.

This means its core business, which is the Model S all-electric luxury sport sedan. In fact, on this it lost upwards of $90 million, according to the Wall Street Journal, which seems to have it out for Tesla and the government’s loan largesse.

Related article: Is Tesla on Google's Shopping List?

Dissecting these financials is fair, but it’s not the only story here. While the investors seem to be overly bullish on Tesla with much thought for the real numbers behind the numbers, there have been some impressive achievements.

Last week, Tesla managed to pay off a $465 million government loan issued in 2010. Regardless of how it managed this, it’s impressive because it’s nine years early and because it removes a major hurdle for a takeover. 

And the market loves Tesla: It’s trading for over 800 times what its earnings are estimated for this year, and it’s valued at over $5 billion, according to Bloomberg.  Shares closed on 26 June at $105.72, up 3.24%. 

By the end of last year, Tesla had sold 2,450 of its electric sports car Roadsters that retail for $109,000; and it’s now started shipping the Model S sedan and is eyeing over 20,000 deliveries for this year, retailing at $69,900 a pop. It’s impressive, but still far from ‘mass’ marketing, and the prices aren’t for the faint of heart.

Related article: Tesla Makes a Recall for Certain Model S Vehicles

Is Tesla ripe for takeover? Probably not just yet. CEO Elon Musk, who owns a 24% share, should hold out for more and it’s too early for that—especially since we’re looking effectively at the most expensive automaker in the US with first-time ‘false profits’ that don’t reflect its core product.  But once it manages to prove itself through its financials—without resorting to emissions credit sales—the takeover will be big.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the meantime, revenues are revenues, and money is money. The market likes Tesla, so we’re listening.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • SA Kiteman on June 29 2013 said:
    Jen, I think you are wrong. I think Tesla's core product IS the emissions credits. It jibes with his "Solar City" subsidies too.
  • David Hrivnak on June 30 2013 said:
    I believe you are wrong as Tesla's goal is sustainable transportation. A car that can run on cleaner and more plentiful fuels.
  • SA Kiteman on July 01 2013 said:
    Then why isn't he making ammonia fueled cars? Carbon free fuel that can be made with any source of electricity.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News