• 8 minutes U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 13 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 16 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 59 mins Knoema: Crude Oil Price Forecast: 2018, 2019 and Long Term to 2030
  • 8 hours Nuclear Pact/Cold War: Moscow Wants U.S. To Explain Planned Exit From Arms Treaty
  • 8 hours Why I Think Natural Gas is the Logical Future of Energy
  • 8 hours Merkel Aims To Ward Off Diesel Car Ban In Germany
  • 7 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 4 hours Iraq war and Possible Lies
  • 1 min Get on Those Bicycles to Save the World
  • 24 hours Can “Renewables” Dent the World’s need for Electricity?
  • 24 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 1 day Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 14 hours Long-Awaited Slowdown in China Exports Still Isn’t Happening
  • 1 hour EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 18 hours Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
Alt Text

The Next Stage In Perovskite Solar Development

Perovskite photovoltaic cells have long…

Alt Text

India’s Renewable Investments Near $20 Billion

India’s investment in renewable energy…

Jess McCabe

Jess McCabe

Jess is a writer for Environmental Finance.Environmental Finance is the leading global publication covering the ever-increasing impact of environmental issues on the lending, insurance, investment…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Export-Import Bank Urged to End Fossil Fuel Binge and Support Renewables

NGOs have accused the US Export-Import (Ex-Im) Bank of “systematic bias towards financing fossil fuel projects”, as the export credit agency prepares to consider backing two giant coal-fired power plants.

John Coequyt of the US environment group Sierra Club said: “Instead of financing dirty power projects abroad, the Export-Import Bank should be positioning US companies to lead in a competitive clean-technology market that can create thousands more jobs in the US.”

“The Ex-Im Bank’s ongoing fossil fuel binge indicates a clear unwillingness to adhere to Congressional climate change directives and systematic bias towards financing fossil fuel projects,” said Doug Norlen from Pacific Environment.

The US Congress has issued a mandate instructing its export credit agency to direct 10% of its financing in 2009 and 2010 to renewable energy and other “environmentally beneficial exports”, such as energy efficiency technologies. But the NGOs, including Sierra Club and South Africa-based Groundwork, pointed to a report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) last month which concludes Ex-Im financing “has been well short of the 10% congressional target”.

The GAO analysis of Ex-Im’s data shows renewables made up less than 2% of the ECA’s financings in 2009 and the first half of 2010. Ex-Im did not return requests for comment before press time.

Meanwhile, the Ex-Im board is expected to vote in a September meeting on whether to back the nearly 5,000MW Kusile coal-fired power plant in South Africa. The NGOs calculate that if Kusile is built, it will emit more than 150% of the annual carbon dioxide emissions of all the projects supported by Ex-Im in 2009. The project developer is utility Eskom, behind the 4,800MW Medupi coal power station, which won World Bank financing earlier this year.

“It’s time to invest in the future of these South African communities, and that means funding clean renewable energy, instead of building dirty coal plants in the name of low-income South Africans,” said Bobby Peak, executive director of Groundwork.

A board vote is also expected this autumn on the controversial $450 billion Sasan coal mine and power plant project, which Ex-Im initially rejected.

By. Jess McCabe

Source: Environmental-Finance




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News