• 4 minutes Pompeo: Aramco Attacks Are An "Act Of War" By Iran
  • 7 minutes Who Really Benefits From The "Iran Attacked Saudi Arabia" Narrative?
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 15 minutes Experts review Saudi damage photos. Say Said is need to do a lot of explaining.
  • 22 mins Iran Vows Major War Even If US Conducts "Limited Strikes"
  • 4 hours Shale profitability
  • 1 hour Memorize date 05/15/2018 cause Huawei ban is the most important single event in world history after 9/11/2001.
  • 9 hours When Trying To Be Objective About Ethanol, Don't Include Big Oil Lies To Balance The Argument
  • 10 mins Hong Kong protesters appeal to Trump for support.
  • 2 hours Europe: The Cracks Are Beginning To Show
  • 11 hours Ethanol, the Perfect Home Remedy for A Saudi Oil Fever
  • 16 hours Let's shut down dissent like The Conversation in Australia
  • 10 hours One of the fire satellite pictures showed what look like the fire hit outside the main oil complex. Like it hit storage or pipeline facility. Not big deal.
  • 16 hours A little something for all you Offshore swabbies
  • 19 hours New designs will reduce transport fuels consumption
  • 4 hours LA Times: Vote Trump out in 2020 to Prevent Climate Apocalypse
  • 20 hours Democrats and Gun Views
  • 2 hours US and China are already in a full economic war and this battle for global hegemony is a little bit frightening
  • 7 hours Yawn... Parliament Poised to Force Brexit Delay Until Jan. 31
John Manfreda

John Manfreda

John majored in Pre-Law at Frosburg State Universtiy and received his MBA at Trinity University. He has co-authored The Petro Profit report and dividend stock…

More Info

Premium Content

Nuclear Is Not Dead, Uranium Supply Deficit Could Be On The Horizon

Since the Fukushima incident, investors have given up on the idea of investing in nuclear power and anything that pertains to it. The Economist even said that nuclear power was the “dream that failed.” This statement wasn’t made irrationally; as Japan and Germany closed down all of their operating reactors due to that incident. These closures also prompted Japanese utility companies to sell uranium on to the open market, which helped trigger a large price decline.

(Click to enlarge)

Despite recent events though, the future of the uranium mining industry, and nuclear power, still looks bright.

Nuclear Power Growth

In the nuclear power industry, one country is considered the main catalyst for growth, and that is China. With 26 reactors in operation, China is now transitioning into the second phase of its nuclear power program. According to the world nuclear association, 24 reactors are under construction in China, with some of these being high temperature, gas cooled reactor plants. In fact, China has an ambitious goal of doubling its nuclear generation capacity by 2020. Related: OPEC Still Holds All The Cards In Oil Price Game

It’s not just China that has ambitious plans to increase its nuclear capacity; Russia is also increasing its nuclear fuel use as well. Russia has eight reactors under construction at present, with one of them being a large fast neutron reactor. These plants are expected to increase Russia’s nuclear capacity by 50 percent this decade.

And there’s more. India has six reactors under construction. Finland is constructing its fifth large nuclear reactor with the first estimated to come on line by 2017. South Korea is now planning to restart four nuclear reactors by 2018, and the U.S. has five nuclear reactors under construction with plans to build five more after that.

The Wild Card

Although China, Russia, and other nations’ potential growth are viewed as great future investment opportunities in the uranium and nuclear energy sector, Japan remains the main driver of growth in the current market. Japan’s growth is considered a wild card, due to the fierce political opposition that has surfaced in Japan after the Fukushima incident.

Despite the unpopularity of nuclear power use in Japan, some believe that Japan will inevitably have to restart its nuclear reactors for economic and security reasons.

Before the Fukushima accident occurred, Japan’s economy was driven by its large trade surpluses, which it achieved year after year. However, since Fukushima, Japan reversed that trend, and began posting trade deficits on a yearly basis. In the year 2011, Japan recorded its first trade deficit of 2.49 trillion yen ($32 billion), in 2012 it recorded a trade deficit of 6.93 trillion yen ($78 billion), in 2013 it posted a trade deficit of 11.47 trillion yen ($112 billion), and in 2014 it posted a trade deficit of 12.8 trillion yen ($106 Billion). Related: Lessons From The Failed Rare Earth Investment Hype

These trade deficits are directly correlated to the shuttering of the nation’s entire nuclear fleet, because the shortfall in nuclear power was replaced by imported fossil fuels. Before the Fukushima incident occurred, 30 percent of Japan’s energy needs were provided by nuclear power, with plans of expanding its use by 50 percent.

Another reason Japan will inevitably revert back to its past use of nuclear power, is due to the consequences Japan had to suffer during the oil shock of 1973, due to OPEC’s oil embargo. During this embargo, Japan suffered from a severe energy shortage, nearly derailing all of its economic progress dating back to WWll.

When this embargo ended, Japan conducted a national energy study to find out how the country could implement an energy policy that would protect supplies from future embargoes and geopolitical turmoil. The ultimate conclusion of the study was that Japan needed to invest heavily in the use of nuclear power, which could supplant imported fossil fuels for electricity. After that study, the development of nuclear power was considered a national priority.

This is why despite strong political opposition to the continued use of nuclear power, Japan has approved a restart to one of its reactors for later this month, as well as a second one for this September.


Why this can cause a Uranium Deficit

Despite claims to the contrary, nuclear power is not dead. In fact it is still growing around the world. But rising demand will also put a strain on the supply of uranium, and many analysts are forecasting a uranium deficit sometime this decade. Paladin Energy, a uranium producing company, is expecting a deficit in 2016. Paladin claims that uranium prices will need to almost triple in order for new supplies to become economic. Other analysts believe that we will see a supply deficit by 2019-2020. This is why China is actively looking to purchase uranium mining companies, while they are still cheap.

Whether we see a deficit or not, no one knows for sure, but what we do know is that production costs are increasing rapidly just as demand is set to rise, starting in 2016-17. When combining these two factors, one can easily conclude that higher uranium prices are coming. But that is probably necessary to halt the closure of mines, and bring new supplies onto the market.

The dream of nuclear power still looks bright. The need for baseload electricity is too great. The only thing that could derail the industry is if another Fukushima type event occurs, at which point, all bets will be off.

By John Manfreda for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • garce on July 12 2015 said:
    What a terrific development for Russia .. thanks , Hillary , for handing a nice
    supply to the Ruskies ..
  • Sir2You on July 15 2015 said:
    Baloney. Thorium!

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play