X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 6 hours America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 58 mins IS SAUDI ARABIA SENDING A MESSAGE TO BIDEN
  • 6 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 2 days Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 2 days Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 2 days Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 2 days Here we go - again: plug-in hybrids cost motorists more than what they were told
  • 3 hours Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial
  • 3 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 2 days An exciting development in EV Aviation: Volocopter
Can Nuclear Power Make A Comeback This Decade?

Can Nuclear Power Make A Comeback This Decade?

2020 is widely considered as…

Europe Divided Over The Future Of Nuclear

Europe Divided Over The Future Of Nuclear

The European Union is planning…

Why Is Nuclear Energy So Expensive?

Why Is Nuclear Energy So Expensive?

As renewable energy costs continue…

SciDev SciDev

SciDev SciDev

SciDev.Net – the Science and Development Network – is a not-for-profit organisation dedicated to providing reliable and authoritative information about science and technology for the…

More Info

Premium Content

Jordan Moving towards a Nuclear Future

[AMMAN] Jordan is to enter the nuclear age with the announcement on 9 December that construction of its first nuclear research and training reactor will begin by February next year.

The Jordan Centre for Nuclear Research, which will host the reactor, will be built at the Jordan University of Science and Technology, about 70 kilometres north of Amman.

Nedal Xoubi, nuclear fuel cycle commissioner of the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission (JAEC), told SciDev.Net that the Jordan Research and Training Reactor (JRTR) will be built at the centre at an estimated cost of US$130 million. The building's foundation was laid last month (23 November).

"The new reactor is a keystone in the nuclear infrastructure of Jordan, as a new generation of nuclear engineers and scientists will be trained in the facility," he said.

A South Korean consortium is building the five-megawatt reactor, which will be used for radioisotope production and training and is expected to be fully operational by 2015.

A full nuclear plant will follow, in line with plans to lessen Jordan's dependence on fossil fuel.

"[We want] to transform Jordan from a net energy importer to a net electricity exporter by 2030, with the aim of making low-cost power available to sustain the country's continued economic growth, and to desalinate very much-needed water," said Khalid Touqan, chairman of Jordan Atomic Energy Commission.

"The pursuit of nuclear power is of crucial importance to a country like Jordan, which imports 96 per cent of its energy at a cost of 20 per cent of its gross domestic product and which faces severe water shortages," he said, adding that the kingdom has estimated uranium oxide reserves of about 70,000 tonnes.

But Ahmad Al-Malabeh, professor of earth and environmental sciences in the Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment at the Hashemite University, said: "Having such an ambitious nuclear project requires creating a functioning system for radioactive waste management, in order to avoid an environmental disaster".

Al-Malabeh said that the JAEC should have been subject to an economic feasibility study to compare it with solar power.

"They focused on the nuclear option because of the existence of significant quantities of uranium, despite the fact that Jordan is in the solar belt, which is excellent for generating solar power."

Ahmad Alkofahi, the executive director of the Jordan Environment Society, said: "The environmental societies [of Jordan] are not against initiating a nuclear reactor, but solar and wind power should be initiated in the same way, as they are much better environmentally and economically".

By. Hanan Alkiswany

Source: SciDev


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on January 01 2011 said:
    The situation here is really quite simple, as I point out in my forthcoming energy economics textbook. IF PLANNING IS FOR THE LONG-RUN, NUCLEAR IS THE OPTIMAL COST OPTION! Moreover, where the long-run is concerned,it probably doesn't have to be too long.The optimal overall arrangement for most - but perhaps not all - countries is some nuclear and a lot of renewable. What nuclear does is provide reliability and 'extra' energy. Moreover, it is the most flexible, however since I have discarded my soap-box, I will not argue that claim here.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News