• 4 minutes Will We Ever See 100$+ OIL?
  • 8 minutes Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 11 minutes Energy Outlook for Renewables. Pie in the sky or real?
  • 15 mins Shale Oil will it self destruct?
  • 2 hours Berkeley becomes first U.S. city to ban natural gas in new homes
  • 21 hours Excellent Choice: Germany's Von der Leyen Secures Powerful EU Executive Top Job
  • 2 hours Today in Energy
  • 2 hours Oil Rises After Iran Says It Seized Foreign Tanker In Gulf
  • 1 hour Mnuchin Says No Change To U.S. Dollar Policy ‘As of Now’
  • 29 mins Populist, But Good: Elizabeth Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds
  • 19 hours Migration From Eastern Europe Raises German Population To Record High
  • 13 hours Washington Post hit piece attacking oil, Christians and Trump
  • 1 day Germany exits coal: A model for Asia?
  • 1 day White House insider who predicted Iran False Flag, David Goldberg found dead in his New York apartment
  • 1 day A Silence is heard
  • 5 hours Why Natural Gas is Natural
Alt Text

Cheaper, Cleaner Biofuel May Be Right Around The Corner

Researchers At Worcester Polytechnic Institute…

Alt Text

The Overlooked Downside Of Ethanol

Ethanol is known to damage…

Alt Text

Good News And Bad News For The Ethanol Industry

The ethanol industry saw some…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

How Much is Too Much Ethanol?

The heat is on for ethanol, as the oil industry lobbies the Obama administration to lower the ethanol-gas mandate for 2014, but the folks in Iowa, for one, want to keep it because it’s one of the leading producers of ethanol.  

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will take the next three months to consider a petition from the American Petroleum Institute and the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, who want to see the ethanol mandate dip below 10% for 2014.

As it stands, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requires refiners to buy alternative fuels to meet a target of 18.15 gallons of renewable fuels blended with gasoline in 2014. The oil industry is hoping to see this lowered to 14.8 billion gallons.

So far they haven’t had any luck. This is the third time they have petitioned to lower the mandate, and they may be rejected for a third time.

Naturally, the Renewable Fuel Standard means different things for different sectors. While the oil industry is losing out, producers of ethanol and growers of crops for biofuels are enjoying a bit of a boom.

For the oil industry, the problem is that the RFS was devised back in 2005, when gas demand predictions were expected to be different. Now we have better fuel economy and demand for gas that is increasing slower than expected. But it’s not the oil industry alone that is suffering under the ethanol mandate. Poultry companies are going bankrupt due to rising prices of feedstock as crops are diverted to ethanol. The state of Minnesota is said to be having a tough time because its revenue relies strongly on chicken farming and egg production, which is getting more and more expensive.

Related article: Sky’s the Limit – Aviation Biofuels About to Take Off?

The state of Iowa shows us the reverse of this equation. Here, corn ethanol plants are making money and providing jobs—and times are good.

There are two sides to every story, and we need a renewable fuel standard that is progressive. From the prospective of biofuels companies, the standard keeps the oil industry from monopolizing the fuel market. The problem with the ethanol mandate is a simple one—it’s based on predictions that were short of the mark, and it should be lowered, but not drastically.

The oil industry’s petition is being considered, strongly, and this time around they may win, though perhaps not with the extent of reductions they are seeking. The EPA has already conceded that the standard’s targets aren’t ideal. At issue is the “blend wall”—the wall the market will hit when it has more biofuels than can be blended with gas. To this end, the EPA has already hinted that it may lower the volumes for 2014, though by how much remains undecided.  

The EPA is talking about introducing more “flexibility” in the process to allow it to reduce total renewable volume requirements for 2014. It is also prepared to allow for more flexibility in terms of compliance deadlines.

A change is likely in store, and the oil industry is likely to see a small victory in the next few months, but this certainly will not be the end of the ethanol mandate—just a tweaking of the targets on the way to the end goal.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on August 19 2013 said:
    Lower the ethanol mandate to zero. I've had enough already.
  • Mark DeRoncey on August 20 2013 said:
    The answer: any amount that is forced on the public. If it is such a great fuel choice then let it stand on its' own merits, give the public the option at the pump. Any fuel that takes more energy to produce than it saves (ethanol from corn) is not a logical source of fuel. Ethanol from corn is nothing more than a farm subsidy pretending to be an energy policy!
  • Dan on August 20 2013 said:
    Nice article.
    With the RFS likely to be a key issue for oil companies at least in the near term, do you know of any intent on the part of oil companies to buy up ethanol producers, or any other 'hedging' strategies for that matter?
  • Hawkeye on August 20 2013 said:
    Corn prices have fallen 30% in the last year, while Oil has risen 10%. The EPA is going to side with the folks in Iowa this year.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play