• 5 minutes Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 11 minutes Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 17 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 2 days The Discount Airline Model Is Coming for Europe’s Railways
  • 18 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 5 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 13 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 1 day Pakistan: "Heart" Of Terrorism and Global Threat
  • 14 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 1 day Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 2 days WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 2 days Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 7 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 2 days Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 6 hours China goes against US natural gas
Alt Text

Is U.S. Biofuel In Jeopardy?

With the reversal of previous…

Alt Text

Research Unveils New Promising Biofuel

New research suggests that young…

Alt Text

U.S. Poised To Ease Biofuel Quotas

Though biofuel technology is moving…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

How Much is Too Much Ethanol?

How Much is Too Much Ethanol?

The heat is on for ethanol, as the oil industry lobbies the Obama administration to lower the ethanol-gas mandate for 2014, but the folks in Iowa, for one, want to keep it because it’s one of the leading producers of ethanol.  

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will take the next three months to consider a petition from the American Petroleum Institute and the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, who want to see the ethanol mandate dip below 10% for 2014.

As it stands, the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requires refiners to buy alternative fuels to meet a target of 18.15 gallons of renewable fuels blended with gasoline in 2014. The oil industry is hoping to see this lowered to 14.8 billion gallons.

So far they haven’t had any luck. This is the third time they have petitioned to lower the mandate, and they may be rejected for a third time.

Naturally, the Renewable Fuel Standard means different things for different sectors. While the oil industry is losing out, producers of ethanol and growers of crops for biofuels are enjoying a bit of a boom.

For the oil industry, the problem is that the RFS was devised back in 2005, when gas demand predictions were expected to be different. Now we have better fuel economy and demand for gas that is increasing slower than expected. But it’s not the oil industry alone that is suffering under the ethanol mandate. Poultry companies are going bankrupt due to rising prices of feedstock as crops are diverted to ethanol. The state of Minnesota is said to be having a tough time because its revenue relies strongly on chicken farming and egg production, which is getting more and more expensive.

Related article: Sky’s the Limit – Aviation Biofuels About to Take Off?

The state of Iowa shows us the reverse of this equation. Here, corn ethanol plants are making money and providing jobs—and times are good.

There are two sides to every story, and we need a renewable fuel standard that is progressive. From the prospective of biofuels companies, the standard keeps the oil industry from monopolizing the fuel market. The problem with the ethanol mandate is a simple one—it’s based on predictions that were short of the mark, and it should be lowered, but not drastically.

The oil industry’s petition is being considered, strongly, and this time around they may win, though perhaps not with the extent of reductions they are seeking. The EPA has already conceded that the standard’s targets aren’t ideal. At issue is the “blend wall”—the wall the market will hit when it has more biofuels than can be blended with gas. To this end, the EPA has already hinted that it may lower the volumes for 2014, though by how much remains undecided.  

The EPA is talking about introducing more “flexibility” in the process to allow it to reduce total renewable volume requirements for 2014. It is also prepared to allow for more flexibility in terms of compliance deadlines.

A change is likely in store, and the oil industry is likely to see a small victory in the next few months, but this certainly will not be the end of the ethanol mandate—just a tweaking of the targets on the way to the end goal.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • David B. Benson on August 19 2013 said:
    Lower the ethanol mandate to zero. I've had enough already.
  • Mark DeRoncey on August 20 2013 said:
    The answer: any amount that is forced on the public. If it is such a great fuel choice then let it stand on its' own merits, give the public the option at the pump. Any fuel that takes more energy to produce than it saves (ethanol from corn) is not a logical source of fuel. Ethanol from corn is nothing more than a farm subsidy pretending to be an energy policy!
  • Dan on August 20 2013 said:
    Nice article.
    With the RFS likely to be a key issue for oil companies at least in the near term, do you know of any intent on the part of oil companies to buy up ethanol producers, or any other 'hedging' strategies for that matter?
  • Hawkeye on August 20 2013 said:
    Corn prices have fallen 30% in the last year, while Oil has risen 10%. The EPA is going to side with the folks in Iowa this year.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News