WTI Crude


Brent Crude


Natural Gas




Heating Oil


Rotate device for more commodity prices

Alt Text

Trump’s War On Climate Change

Many bold claims about energy…

Alt Text

Just How Hard Is It To Cut Greenhouse Gases?

A study from Lawrence Berkeley…

The Global Warming Scam Hit by More Scandal

For the scientifically adept and honest people global warming is a huge embarrassment.  Not only have the main base perpetrators been caught but also the institutions that house their activities have gone deep into the coverup.  It’s just too much money to let integrity rule their actions.  The global warming scheme has tens of thousands of people employed even though that seemingly high cost is miniscule compared to the harm to billions of people the stage two schemes of corrective measures would force on the innocent.  A taxpaying family is out a few dollars each year now but the corrective measures could get to hundreds of dollars per month.

Its something far more dangerous that low intensity wars would be.  Yet media and leadership are out of touch.  Integrity be damned, so to speak.

Not everyone is lost.  Some, only a few, get the message and act to preserve the integrity of science.  It’s hard to resist all that money and notoriety.  Al Gore is famed on falsehoods, sort of that Gary Hart idea “you can get real famous in just two weeks,” comment taken to a whole new level.  That fame mixed with fear has flooded the scam with money.  That leaves those with integrity out in the wilderness shouting at the emptiness.

But for those with an age past needing the career funded or the integrity to stand up to the snake oil sales pitch a little can be done.  When its somebody very highly regarded, with an impeccable reputation and is slapping down a U.S. national association – its news – and an act worth our attention and respect.

But not by major media news in the U.S. so it’s up to a viral spread.

Harold Lewis, Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara has resigned from the American Physical Society. Here is short version of the Lewis career pedigree: Emeritus Professor of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara and former Chairman; Former member Defense Science Board, chairman of Technology panel; Chairman DSB study on Nuclear Winter; Former member Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Former member, President’s Nuclear Safety Oversight Committee; Chairman APS study on Nuclear Reactor Safety Chairman Risk Assessment Review Group; Co-founder and former Chairman of JASON; Former member USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Served in US Navy in WW II.

This is news.  The Lewis resignation is significant, the reason are damning.  Lewis’ act may be a historical moment and calls into doubt the integrity and credibility of the management of the American Physical Society. It’s past time for these things to get underway.

Anthony Watts of WattsUpWithThat suggests the letter is, “worthy of repeating . . . in (its) entirety on every blog that discusses science.”  This writer agrees – far too much human capital is being wasted as well as billions of dollars and risks to the future from a fraud.  This IS serious stuff.

Here is his letter of resignation to Curtis G. Callan Jr, Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society. It’s a damning document of great courage and some sacrifice.
From: Hal Lewis, University of California, Santa Barbara

To: Curtis G. Callan, Jr., Princeton University, President of the American Physical Society
6 October 2010

Dear Curt:

When I first joined the American Physical Society sixty-seven years ago it was much smaller, much gentler, and as yet uncorrupted by the money flood (a threat against which Dwight Eisenhower warned a half-century ago). Indeed, the choice of physics as a profession was then a guarantor of a life of poverty and abstinence—it was World War II that changed all that. The prospect of worldly gain drove few physicists. As recently as thirty-five years ago, when I chaired the first APS study of a contentious social/scientific issue, The Reactor Safety Study, though there were zealots aplenty on the outside there was no hint of inordinate pressure on us as physicists. We were therefore able to produce what I believe was and is an honest appraisal of the situation at that time. We were further enabled by the presence of an oversight committee consisting of Pief Panofsky, Vicki Weisskopf, and Hans Bethe, all towering physicists beyond reproach. I was proud of what we did in a charged atmosphere. In the end the oversight committee, in its report to the APS President, noted the complete independence in which we did the job, and predicted that the report would be attacked from both sides. What greater tribute could there be?

How different it is now. The giants no longer walk the earth, and the money flood has become the raison d’être of much physics research, the vital sustenance of much more, and it provides the support for untold numbers of professional jobs. For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

So what has the APS, as an organization, done in the face of this challenge? It has accepted the corruption as the norm, and gone along with it. For example:

1. About a year ago a few of us sent an e-mail on the subject to a fraction of the membership. APS ignored the issues, but the then President immediately launched a hostile investigation of where we got the e-mail addresses. In its better days, APS used to encourage discussion of important issues, and indeed the Constitution cites that as its principal purpose. No more. Everything that has been done in the last year has been designed to silence debate

2. The appallingly tendentious APS statement on Climate Change was apparently written in a hurry by a few people over lunch, and is certainly not representative of the talents of APS members as I have long known them. So a few of us petitioned the Council to reconsider it. One of the outstanding marks of (in) distinction in the Statement was the poison word incontrovertible, which describes few items in physics, certainly not this one. In response APS appointed a secret committee that never met, never troubled to speak to any skeptics, yet endorsed the Statement in its entirety. (They did admit that the tone was a bit strong, but amazingly kept the poison word incontrovertible to describe the evidence, a position supported by no one.) In the end, the Council kept the original statement, word for word, but approved a far longer “explanatory” screed, admitting that there were uncertainties, but brushing them aside to give blanket approval to the original. The original Statement, which still stands as the APS position, also contains what I consider pompous and asinine advice to all world governments, as if the APS were master of the universe. It is not, and I am embarrassed that our leaders seem to think it is. This is not fun and games, these are serious matters involving vast fractions of our national substance, and the reputation of the Society as a scientific society is at stake.

3. In the interim the ClimateGate scandal broke into the news, and the machinations of the principal alarmists were revealed to the world. It was a fraud on a scale I have never seen, and I lack the words to describe its enormity. Effect on the APS position: none. None at all. This is not science; other forces are at work.

4. So a few of us tried to bring science into the act (that is, after all, the alleged and historic purpose of APS), and collected the necessary 200+ signatures to bring to the Council a proposal for a Topical Group on Climate Science, thinking that open discussion of the scientific issues, in the best tradition of physics, would be beneficial to all, and also a contribution to the nation. I might note that it was not easy to collect the signatures, since you denied us the use of the APS membership list. We conformed in every way with the requirements of the APS Constitution, and described in great detail what we had in mind—simply to bring the subject into the open.

5. To our amazement, Constitution be damned, you declined to accept our petition, but instead used your own control of the mailing list to run a poll on the members’ interest in a TG on Climate and the Environment. You did ask the members if they would sign a petition to form a TG on your yet-to-be-defined subject, but provided no petition, and got lots of affirmative responses. (If you had asked about sex you would have gotten more expressions of interest.) There was of course no such petition or proposal, and you have now dropped the Environment part, so the whole matter is moot. (Any lawyer will tell you that you cannot collect signatures on a vague petition, and then fill in whatever you like.) The entire purpose of this exercise was to avoid your constitutional responsibility to take our petition to the Council.

6. As of now you have formed still another secret and stacked committee to organize your own TG, simply ignoring our lawful petition.

APS management has gamed the problem from the beginning, to suppress serious conversation about the merits of the climate change claims. Do you wonder that I have lost confidence in the organization?

I do feel the need to add one note, and this is conjecture, since it is always risky to discuss other people’s motives. This scheming at APS HQ is so bizarre that there cannot be a simple explanation for it. Some have held that the physicists of today are not as smart as they used to be, but I don’t think that is an issue. I think it is the money, exactly what Eisenhower warned about a half-century ago. There are indeed trillions of dollars involved, to say nothing of the fame and glory (and frequent trips to exotic islands) that go with being a member of the club. Your own Physics Department (of which you are chairman) would lose millions a year if the global warming bubble burst. When Penn State absolved Mike Mann of wrongdoing, and the University of East Anglia did the same for Phil Jones, they cannot have been unaware of the financial penalty for doing otherwise. As the old saying goes, you don’t have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing. Since I am no philosopher, I’m not going to explore at just which point enlightened self-interest crosses the line into corruption, but a careful reading of the ClimateGate releases makes it clear that this is not an academic question.

I want no part of it, so please accept my resignation. APS no longer represents me, but I hope we are still friends.


One day ‘Global Warming’ will in be history’s trash can.  The question is how much will be lost in the hysteria in the meantime.

By. Brian Westenhaus

Source: The Incredible Global Warming Scam gets hit again

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on October 19 2010 said:
    Hal Lewis is not the only renowned scientist to walk away from the anti-science of catastrophic AGW. The people who promote catastrophic AGW these days largely include the corrupt, the stupid, and the lazy. If you find yourself among that number and you are older than age 40, it is probably too late for you. Just go with the flow. The end, when it comes, will come quickly.
  • Anonymous on October 19 2010 said:
    I saw this a week ago now.People might want to watch this video too.Google video - The Great Global Warming Swindle.Tip of a big iceberg as it were..I disagree with Alfonso - the end will be very slow and painful and the pain will be from multiple sources.ie economic, environmental,social&political.Life on Earth is about to get very nasty for everyone, VERY soon now.
  • Anonymous on October 19 2010 said:
    Instead of funding scientific research Congress should just legislate the results and make it a crime to deny them. We could save billions!
  • Anonymous on October 19 2010 said:
    Not one peer reviewed scientific paper will agree with the conclusion that any of the Earth ecological systems are improving as a result of human activity. Not because of a mass conspiracy, but because our generation is documented as producing more waste then at anytime in history, our recently adopted 'throw away' life style is too much for natural cycles to manage without degradation.- Mike
  • Anonymous on October 20 2010 said:
    Mike, your comment is beside the point. Unless there is scientific proof for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming -- which there is not -- we cannot allow the governments and inter-governmental organizations of the world to strip advanced economies to the bone to fund a false crusade.Quasi-religious notions and beliefs that "humans are destroying the earth" are simply do not signify. Scientific proof of the highest order is demanded to justify such extreme action by Obama, the EU and the IPCC. Such proof is glaringly absent.In this situation, the "precautionary principle" clearly argues against drastic action by the carbon hysterics and climate crusaders.
  • Anonymous on October 26 2010 said:
    It is choking to see that some people still claim that human induced climate change is not taking place ! It must be denial (or lots of money under the table)- almost every single person on the planet can look around themselves and see the evident changes in the natural environment. Yes, history is marked by circles or CO2 and temperature variations - but never have the earth witnessed such a massive acceleration of temperature as the one we witness in these decades. With ecosystems incapable to adapting to such radical changes, we are pushing species extinction to even higher rates and inducing massive migration of the poorest unable to harvest their land.Carbon taxes and emission permits are essential to make the corrections needed where the market fails!
  • Anonymous on October 30 2010 said:
    It is global warming denialism that's the scam. That's because with global warming more people will tend to spend and consume less, something that big business and government do not like. That's why the main supporters of denialism are oil companies:http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/12697/64918http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=522784499045867811In fact, as the second link reveals, some of the main proponents even worked for the tobacco industry and were hired by the same PR firms to question health claims regarding smoking.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News