|
Bad news concerning the Gulf oil disaster continues to come from WMR's federal government sources in the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the US Army Corps of Engineers. Emergency planners are dealing with a prospective "dead zone" within a 200 mile radius from the Deepwater Horizon disaster datum in the Gulf.
A looming environmental and population displacement disaster is brewing in the Gulf. The oil dispersant used by BP, Corexit 9500, is seen by FEMA sources as mixing with evaporated water from the Gulf and absorbed by rain clouds producing toxic precipitation that threatens to continue killling marine and land animals, plant life, and humans within a 200-mile radius of the Deepwater Horizon disaster site in the Gulf.
Adding to the worries of FEMA and the Corps of Engineers is the large amounts of methane that are escaping from the cavernous grotto of oil underneath the Macondo drilling area of Gulf of Mexico.
On a recent visit to the Gulf coast, President Obama vowed that the Gulf coast will "return to normal." However, federal officials dealing with the short- and long-term impact of the oil disaster report that the "dead zone" created by a combination of methane gas and Corexit toxic rain will force the evacuation and long-term abandonment of cities and towns within the 200-mile radius of the oil volcano.
Plans are being put in place for the mandatory evacuation of New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Mandeville, Hammond, Houma, Belle Chase, Chalmette, Slidell, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pensacola, Hattiesburg, Mobile, Bay Minette, Fort Walton Beach, Panama City, Crestview, and Pascagoula.
The toxic rain from the Gulf is expected to poison fresh water reservoirs and lakes, streams, and rivers, which will also have a disastrous impact on agriculture and livestock, as well as drinking water, in the affected region.
FREE Breaking Investment & Geopolitical Intelligence - Previously only available to Governments, Intelligence Agencies & selected Hedge Funds. Click here for more information on our Free Weekly Intelligence Report
FEMA officials also claim that the $20 billion compensation fund set aside by BP is not nearly enough to offset the costs of the disaster. The FEMA sources say the disaster will cost well in excess of $1 trillion, and likely closer to $2-3 trillion.
Read Wayne’s first breakthrough article on the Oil Spill and other interesting pieces:
The Cover-up: BP's Crude Politics and the Looming Environmental Mega-Disaster
BP Gets Pass From Obama Administration To Potentially Pollute Lake Michigan
8 Long Term Economic and Environmental Effects of the Gulf Oil Spill
Could There Be A Bright Side To the Gulf of Mexico Disaster
10 Geopolitical Predictions for 2010 & Short Term Strategic Outlook
By The Wayne Madsen Report for OilPrice.com
|
The Environment 
Comments
If you are right, god help the people of the gulf and this will have knock-on effects all over the world.I am an Aussie and know we live in a global village.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE65L6IA20100622
Whenever something big hits the news and gets as much attention as this spill has you need to ask yourself one question, what is going on that I am not hearing about. I assure you there is worse being done and you are not hearing about it. This is an old game. You have to look deeper. We are coming to a time when we have to know what the traitors are up to in order to survive,
I hate to tell you this, but climate change in not a discredited theory. The most recent research (http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf and http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.full.pdf+html) show about 97% or climate scietists believe global warming is occuring and is man made. Most of the ones the disagree have done the most limited research into the area.
If you are talking about the stink about the scientist that fixed his data. Well he noticed that the estimate of tempature based on tree growth was varying farther and farther from actual in more and more recent years. So he fixed it by inputting actual tempature. Actually weakening the warming effect.
Before writting about your " studies", find out who finance these fellows....:):) Case solved.
What kind of "scientist" discards the RAW data they used to arrive at proving their theory? None that I am aware of, unless that data disproves that which they were HOPING to bolster their hollow theory.
Observable, objectively Testable, REPEATABLE. Hmmm mayhaps my science teacher was wackey too!
How many dinos had to die in that particular location at that great depth under the sea and sea bed to produce that much oil under that much pressure?
The abiotic theory of oil creation is looking pretty good right now.
They won't capture the oil because there's so much of it spewing out the price would fall drastically. I would practically be free.
They won't fix it because it's way too profitable to the owners of the corporation that clean up that produces the very toxic Corexit (right Mr. Gore?) and the other corporations that specialize in cleaning up oil spills recently acquired by certain parties immediately before the oil spill.
Business as usual for the corporations - death, illness and destruction for the rest of us.
As Rahm Emmanuel said "Never let a good crisis go to waste" (or words to that effect).
RSS feed for comments to this post.