WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Why We Can Expect Cripplingly Higher Oil Prices In The Near Future

Oil Rig

The break-even price for Permian basin tight oil plays is about $61 per barrel (Table 1). That puts Permian plays among the lowest cost significant supply sources in the world. Although that is good news for U.S. tight oil plays, there is a dark side to the story.

Just because tight oil is low-cost compared to other expensive sources of oil doesn’t mean that it is cheap. Nor is it commercial at current oil prices.

The disturbing truth is that the real cost of oil production has doubled since the 1990s. That is very bad news for the global economy. Those who believe that technology is always the answer need to think about that.

Through that lens, Permian basin tight oil plays are the best of a bad, expensive lot.

Table 1. Weighted average break-even price for top operators in Permian basin tight oil plays. Source: Drilling Info, company documents and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Not Shale Plays and Not New

The tight oil plays in the Permian basin are not shale plays. Spraberry and Bone Spring reservoirs are mostly sandstones and Wolfcamp reservoirs are mostly limestones.

Nor are they new plays. All have produced oil and gas for decades from vertically drilled wells. Reservoirs are commonly laterally discontinuous and, therefore, had poor well performance. Horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have largely addressed those issues at drilling and completion costs of $6-7 million per well.

Permian Basin Overview

The Permian basin is among the most mature producing areas in the world. It has produced more than 31.5 billion barrels of oil and 112 trillion cubic feet of gas since 1921. Current production is approximately 1.9 million barrels of oil (mmbo) and 6.6 billion cubic feet of gas (bcfg) per day.

The Permian basin is located in west Texas and southeastern New Mexico (Figure 1). It is sub-divided into the Midland basin on the east and the Delaware basin on the west, separated by the Central Basin platform.

Figure 1. Permian basin location and tight oil play map. Source: Dutton (2004), Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The first commercial discovery in the Permian basin was made in 1921 at the Westbrook Field (Figure 1). It was followed in 1926 with the 2 billion barrel (bbo) Yates Field (San Andres & Grayburg reservoirs), the 2.1 bbo Wasson Field (Glorieta and Leonard reservoirs) in 1936, and the 1.5 bbo Slaughter Field (Abo and Clear Fork reservoirs) also in 1936. Reservoirs were chiefly high-quality limestones although the Wasson and Slaughter fields also produced from mixed sandstones and limestones that are equivalent to reservoirs in today’s Bone Springs tight oil play.

The Spraberry Field (1949) was the first discovery whose primary reservoir was among the present tight oil plays (Figure 2). Its ultimate production before horizontal drilling was estimated at 932 mmbo. The field had low recovery efficiency of 8-10 percent and was only marginally commercial prior to the recent phase of tight oil drilling.

Tight Oil Plays

I evaluated the three main tight oil plays. The Trend Area-Spraberry play is located mostly in the Midland basin while the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays are located mainly in the Delaware basin (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 2. Permian basin stratigraphic column showing principal tight oil plays. Source: Dutton (2004), Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The Wolfcamp play has produced the most oil and gas—205 million barrels of oil equivalent (mmBOE)*—and has the largest number of producing wells, followed by the Trend Area-Spraberry and Bone Spring plays (Table 2). All of the plays produce considerable associated gas and only the Trend Area-Spraberry is technically an oil play. The Wolfcamp and Bone Spring are classified as gas-condensate plays based on liquid yield.

(Click to enlarge)

Table 2. Permian horizontal tight oil play cumulative production, number of producing wells, liquid yield and oil classification. BO=barrels of oil; MCF=thousands of cubic feet of gas; BOE=barrels of oil equivalent using a 15:1 conversion from mcf to BOE; BPM=barrels of liquid per million cubic feet of gas. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The Bone Spring play is the most commercially attractive of the tight oil plays with an estimated $49 per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) break-even price for the top 5 operators. The Spraberry play has a break-even price of $55 per BOE for the top 5 operators but considerably higher well density and, therefore, lower long-term potential. Results from the Wolfcamp play are mixed with an average break-even price of $75 per BOE for the top 5 operators but $61 per BOE excluding one operator with poorer well performance.

Trend Area-Spraberry Play

I evaluated the 5 key operators in the Trend Area-Spraberry play with the greatest cumulative production and number of producing wells: Pioneer (PXD), Laredo (LPI), Diamondback (FANG), Apache (APA) and Energen (EGN) (Table 3).

(Click to enlarge)

Table 3. Trend Area-Spraberry play key operators’ cumulative production, liquid yield and number of producing wells. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

I did standard rate vs. time decline-curve analysis for those operators. The matches with production history were generally good as shown in the examples in Figure 3.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 3. Trend Area-Spraberry play examples of decline-curve analysis. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Much of the gas production in the Permian basin is irregular because of periodic flaring so matching gas production history was sometimes difficult. Oil reporting in Texas is by lease rather than by well so there are periodic upward excursions of oil production as new wells on the same lease come on line. For these reasons, I feel that the decline-curve analysis results are probably optimistic.

The average Trend Area-Spraberry well EUR (estimated ultimate recovery) for the 5 operators is approximately 265,000 BOE using an economic value-based conversion of natural gas-to-barrels of oil equivalent of 15-to-1 (Table 4). The break-even oil price for that average EUR is approximately $55 per BOE. Laredo has the best average well performance with a break-even oil price of about $43 per BOE and Apache has the poorest well performance and highest break-even price of almost $92 per BOE.

(Click to enlarge)

Table 4. EUR (estimated ultimate production) from decline-curve analysis and break-even oil prices for key operators in the Trend Area-Spraberry play. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Economic assumptions are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Economic assumptions for Permian basin plays. Source: Company documents and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Wolfcamp Play

The top 5 producers in the Wolfcamp play are Cimarex (XEC), Anadarko (APC), EOG, Devon (DVN) and EP (EPE) (Table 6).

(Click to enlarge)

Table 6. Wolfcamp play key operators’ cumulative production, liquid yield and number of producing wells. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Examples of decline-curve analysis for this play are shown in Figure 4.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 4. Wolfcamp play examples of decline-curve analysis. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The average Wolfcamp well EUR for the 5 operators is approximately 228,000 BOE (Table 7). The break-even oil price for that average EUR is approximately $75 per BOE. That is because of poor well performance by Devon and EP whose break-even oil prices are more than $100 per BOE.

By eliminating EP from the calculations, the average EUR for the play is approximately 303,000 BOE and the associated break-even price is about $61 per BOE.

Anadarko has the best average well performance with a break-even oil price of about $45 per BOE and EP has the poorest well performance and highest break-even price of almost $177 per BOE.

Table 7. EUR (estimated ultimate production) from decline-curve analysis and break-even oil prices for key operators in the Wolfcamp play. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Economic assumptions are shown above in Table 4.

Bone Spring Play

The top 5 producers in the Bone Spring play are Cabot (COG), Devon (DVN), Cimarex (XEC), Energen (EGN) and Mewbourne (Table 8).

(Click to enlarge)

Table 8. Bone Spring play key operators’ cumulative production, liquid yield and number of producing wells. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Examples of decline-curve analysis for this play are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 5. Bone Spring play examples of decline-curve analysis. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The average Bone Spring well EUR for the 5 operators is approximately 294,000 BOE (Table 9). The break-even oil price for that average EUR is approximately $49 per BOE.

Cimarex has the best average well performance with a break-even oil price of about $42 per BOE and Mewbourne has the poorest well performance and highest break-even price of almost $78 per BOE.

Table 9. EUR (estimated ultimate production) from decline-curve analysis and break-even oil prices for key operators in the Bone Spring play. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Economic assumptions are shown above in Table 4.

Commercial Play Areas

I made EUR maps for the 3 Permian basin tight oil plays using all wells with 12 months of production. I then used the average play EUR to determine commercial cutoffs for $45 and $60 per BOE oil prices using the economic assumptions in Table 4.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 6. Trend Area-Spraberry commercial area maps at $45 and $60 per barrel of oil equivalent prices. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 7. Wolfcamp commercial area maps at $45 and $60 per barrel of oil equivalent prices. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 8. Bone Spring commercial area maps at $45 and $60 per barrel of oil equivalent prices. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Using the calculated EUR-cutoffs for the two oil-price cases, 26 percent of Permian tight oil place well break even at $45 per BOE, and 40 percent break even at $60 per BOE price (Table 10).

(Click to enlarge)

Table 10. Number and percent of commercial wells for the Trend Area-Spraberry, Wolfcamp and Bone Spring tight oil plays at $45 and $60 per BOE oil prices. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Current well density was calculated by measuring the mapped area of the $60 commercial area and dividing by the number of producing wells within those polygons. The Wolfcamp has the lowest well density of 1,269 acres per well and, therefore, the most development potential (Table 11). The Bone Spring also has considerable infill potential with 725 acres per well.

Table 11. Current well density for the $60 commercial areas of the Trend Area-Spraberry, Wolfcamp and Bone Spring plays. Source: Drilling Info and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

The Trend Area-Spraberry has additional development potential but a comparatively lower current well density of 281 acres per well because there are more than 6,000 vertical producing wells within the $60 commercial area defined by horizontal well EUR. These vertical wells have produced 203 MMBOE to date, approximately equal to the 206 MMBOE for all horizontal wells both inside and outside of the commercial area.

Operators routinely stress the large number of potential infill locations in their investor presentations and press releases based on very close well spacing of, for example, 40 acres per well. Although well density is important for determining play life, I doubt that well spacing of much less than 100 acres per well is economically attractive because of potential interference between wells that are drilled horizontally and hydraulically fractured.

Investors should understand that more wells is not better. Superior economics result from drilling the fewest number of wells necessary to optimize production.

Operators also stress the potential for additional potential reservoirs within the same play reservoir. That is undoubtedly true but those are not yet discovered and are, therefore, resources and not reserves of any category based on the SPE Petroleum Resources Management System. If they are so attractive, why haven’t they been drilled and produced already?

Love In The Time of Cholera

Tight oil and shale gas plays emerged at a time of worry and angst about impending resource scarcity and the decline of America as a world energy power. For some, these plays renewed faith in the ingenuity and technology that made America great. Now, there are even widespread delusions about becoming energy-independent and using new-found resources for global political and economic advantage.

Tight oil was a story of bittersweet success because the plays were commercial only at very high oil prices. When prices dropped in 2014, many expected that these plays would collapse. Instead, producers have taken advantage of the lowest oil-field service prices in decades and the plays have emerged as low-cost leaders among important suppliers of the world’s crude oil.

Low oil-field service costs won’t last and neither will the low break-even prices shown in this post. Still, tight oil plays and two of the Permian basin plays in particular, will break-even at lower prices than almost all OPEC producers once fiscal costs are included (Figure 9). The cost to balance a fiscal budget is the equivalent of corporate overhead for a country whose principal source of income is oil.

But just because tight oil is low cost compared to other expensive sources of oil, it doesn’t mean that it is cheap. Nor is it commercial at current oil prices.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 9. Projected 2016 Break-Even Oil Prices for OPEC & Unconventional Plays. OPEC prices are IMF estimates that include revenue to balance fiscal budgets. Source: IMF, Rystad Energy, Suncor, Cenovus, COS & Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Since 2009, oil has never been more expensive. The average price in real May 2016 dollars is $83 per barrel, the highest in history (Figure 10). This average includes the year of low oil prices in 2009 after The Financial Crisis and the two years since the mid-2014 oil-price collapse.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 10. Oil Prices in May 2016 Dollars, 1950-2016. Source: EIA, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis & Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Even during the period of the oil shocks from 1974 to 1986, real oil prices were far lower, averaging $68 per barrel. Today’s price of $48 per barrel remains higher than the average real price of $45 since 1950.

Those who believe that Peak Oil is a failed observation do not understand that it was never about running out of oil. Peak Oil was always about running out of cheap oil. That is an indisputable fact.

The Bone Spring and Trend Area-Spraberry plays of the Permian basin are cheaper than any major world source of oil except Kuwait. They are the best of a bad lot.

Gabriel García Márquez’s masterpiece Love In The Time of Cólera is a story of forbidden love. Cholera is, of course, a disease that comes from infected water supplies and can result in prostration from the loss of fluids (Cólera more commonly means anger or rage in Spanish).

Like a disease, the high cost of energy and debt, its corollary, have drained the life from our global economy over the last several decades. The economic benefits anticipated from lower oil prices after the price collapse did not materialize because prices never stayed low enough for long enough.

The period of high oil prices from 1974 to 1986 created great economic distress for most of the world including the United States. Those who want to make America great again recall the economic prosperity of 1987 to 1999 (Reagan-Bush-Clinton years) when real oil prices averaged only $33 per barrel.

The economic problems that lead up to the 2008 Financial Collapse included high oil prices from 2000 through 2008. The massive new debt that was incurred to remedy that crisis as well as even higher oil prices have thwarted a recovery.

Since the 2014 price collapse, monthly oil prices were less than $33 per barrel for only two months in January and February of this year.

Many talk hopefully about renewed drilling now that oil prices are near $50 per barrel. I doubt that prices will stay at $50 but will, instead, follow the 2015-2016 pattern of cyclicity. Prices should trend higher but I don’t expect a major shift to new drilling or a return to the peak production rates of 2014 and early 2015. The industry is wounded and will not heal for many years if ever.

Tight oil may have bought us a few years of abundance but the resulting over-supply, debt and prolonged period of prices below the cost of production have exacted a terrible cost. Under-investment, a damaged service sector, weak oil company balance sheets and a decimated work force practically ensure cripplingly higher prices a few years in the future.

The calamity of our time of cholera is that we cannot escape ever-higher costs of oil production.

*I use a 15 cubic feet per barrel equivalent conversion based on the price of natural gas and crude oil. The conversion based on energy content is approximately 6:1 and is used by most producers to calculate BOE EUR. The EUR reported by producers are, therefore, higher than those shown in this study especially for plays and wells with high gas-oil ratios.

By Art Berman for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • JP DeCaen on June 20 2016 said:
    Anyone who thinks internal combustion engined vehicles will still sell in the era of renewed high fuel prices has not studied what is happening in the world of electric vehicles today.
  • Chris Ray on June 21 2016 said:
    Very good article. Author is very knowledgeable. You don't see the article like this very often. Thanks!
  • Amtet on June 21 2016 said:
    Electric vehicles today are for the wealthy of developed countries.
    Most of the globe´s countries have a shortage of electricity and no cash to correct the problem..
  • GregSS on June 21 2016 said:
    JP - I agree. I've been in the oil industry practically my whole life, and what I see is oil prices spiking in the near future, right when a whole bunch of new electric vehicles will be hitting the market. Oil's best days are behind us, and will slowly decline as other fuels take over.
  • Philip Branton on June 21 2016 said:
    Hmm.......oil is just exactly like water. Too little water due to high prices and the economy starves....too much water due to very low prices and the economy floods the weakest "crops". All the while the general population fail to even realize the similarities to the story of Noah. We wonder just how aware the general oil services workers and families really are. The strategic moves by the energy and financial sector operatives have severe "harmonic and echo" tones. While this author has unique insight, do readers actually realize how to use the information? Heck, how is this website even being used in every high school across our nation to educate students about supply and demand principles? What is worse... crippling higher oil prices or the crippling cost of consumer awareness? Lets hope the "Grinch" who tries to keep stealing the "Oil Christmas" realizes how a fairy tale ends in Texas or Venezuela.
  • Philip Branton on June 21 2016 said:
    Mr. Berman, just for kicks. If history is any indicator, how much oil and gas is off the east coast of the United States? Recently, the permitting for exploration was denied. (According to media reports) How easy is it for a "private" boat to conduct their own testing using modern technology? How would consumers use that information? Who would publish it?
    My college roommate was a geology major and I found some information at the time (1985) to be very unbelievable; until I actually did my own exploration with modern mapping and research. How would your article here be used by high school kids in real time via social media to actually verify and promote your work beyond the oilprice.com website..? Thanks....
  • Lee James on June 21 2016 said:
    Everyone is struggling to figure out the break-even price for price of a barrel of oil. This article lays it out better than any other article that I've seen. Thank you!

    We do need to know the score for what it means to burn-up a barrel of oil.
  • christopher pflaum on June 22 2016 said:
    "Figure 9. Projected 2016 Break-Even Oil Prices for OPEC & Unconventional Plays. OPEC prices are IMF estimates that include revenue to balance fiscal budgets. Source: IMF, Rystad Energy, Suncor, Cenovus, COS & Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc." is, at best, manifest disinformation. Elementary economics teaches that fiscal load is not a component of break even full cost. Though the author is clearly an expert in geology, his understanding of economics does not even approach that of the average undergraduate.
  • Duanef on June 24 2016 said:
    I too found the bit about fiscal load to be disingenuous. Why doesn't the US price oil break even at what it would take to balance the US budget then? It's not even an apples to apples comparison, but mostly it's just a ridiculous comparison. Look at what it takes to get the oil out of the ground and that's that.
  • Mp123 on June 24 2016 said:
    I'm not sure looking at breakevens for fiscal budgets in OPEC is all that instructive. It used to indicate a "target" price for oil, but with OPEC essentially giving up on managing global oil prices, they don't mean a whole lot. The cost per barrel of production in Iran/Saudi is well below the Permian. So, unless they run out of cash to fund E&P (Venezuela?), their incentive remains to produce at these prices and prices well below here.

    That said, we've seen huge Capex declines globally (ex OPEC). Much of China's production is uneconomic at today's prices and offshore appears to be a loser as payback times are deferred due to the nature of their production curve.
  • Tom S on June 24 2016 said:
    "Those who believe that Peak Oil is a failed observation do not understand that it was never about running out of oil. Peak Oil was always about running out of cheap oil. That is an indisputable fact."

    That statement is just blatantly wrong and is an obvious attempt to re-write history. Calling it an "indisputable fact" just shows a willingness to say whatever it takes to erase the history of failed predictions from peak oilers.

    I have read all of Colin Campbell's books and papers, as well as Hubbert's and the rest of the material. They were clearly and obviously saying that the AMOUNT of CONVENTIONAL OIL would begin a TERMINAL decline around 2005-2008, thereafter declining at a rate of a few percent per year. That is obvious from the graph on pp 4 of the linked article (pp 81 in Scientific American), where it shows conventional oil extraction beginning a terminal decline around 2004. By now, the rate of conventional oil extraction outside the persian gulf was supposed to have fallen by nearly 40%, which obviously did not happen. Predictions for the former Soviet Union were even worse. Hubbert curves would NEVER have worked for OPEC or the FSU, for reasons which are obvious in retrospect.

    In this case, Berman is saying things that are just blatantly wrong.

    -Tom S
  • Bob Morris on July 01 2016 said:
    Most of these idiots do not have any understanding of how the oil industry really works.
    This is a very good article.
  • Conrad Maher on July 09 2016 said:
    Another great article by Art. We must be grateful to such knowledgeable people who make the effort to collate and present so much factual data in an easy to use format. Thank you for sharing that with us.
  • american on July 13 2016 said:
    13.56 megahertz

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News