• 2 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 2 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 3 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 4 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 4 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 6 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 7 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 8 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 24 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 1 day Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 1 day Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 1 day EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 1 day Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
Keith Schaefer

Keith Schaefer

Keith is the publisher of the Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin – an investment newsletter that looks at opportunities within the Canadian small cap oil…

More Info

The Swing Vote That Could Switch Natural Gas Back to Coal

It's a big question for America's big electricity producers.

Will rising natural gas prices push producers back to using coal?

After all, natural gas prices are breaking out above their recent low trough in the $2.60/mcf-$3.10/mcf (million cubic feet) range.

It's true that North America's natural gas prices are decided by its electricity producers. The gas producers have held supply constant—roughly 64 bcf/d (billion cubic feet per day) this year – despite $2/mcf gas.

Power companies have increased demand by about 6 bcf/d in 2012—even in the spring, before the torrid summer heatwave began. 

That represents just under 10% of total US demand.  That's why the power producers are the big swing vote.  Without them, gas would still be under $2/mcf.

So if they switch back to coal, the natural gas rally could get halted dead in its tracks.

“I would predict that if the price of natural gas climbs sustainably above US$3.25, some 10 per cent of that switched would switch back to coal. And that percent would climb if prices rose to US$4,” said energy veteran Thomas Drolet, who is formerly head of Ontario Hydro International.

When natural gas prices started falling from averages of around US$4.50 per mmBtu in January 2012, power generators started switching to the cheaper fuel from coal.

RELATED: Oil Markets Limp into Fourth Quarter

I follow the natural gas markets closely, but I’m not an engineer.  So I wanted to know—logistically, how easy is it for these big electricity companies to switch back from natural gas to coal?

Well, it’s as easy as changing a nozzle.

In most power plants, fuel is pushed to boilers via nozzles.  The nozzles either spray powdered coal or natural gas to ignite and heat up tubes with water circulating in them. The steam generated by the hot water drives the turbines, which in turn generate electricity.

It’s quite simple to change nozzles to accommodate different diameters and pressures. Many plants can handle both gas and coal and can move from one to another in a matter of hours—as in one, eight-hour shift. Older plants can take days, however.

As well, access to natural gas for a change-over to coal would be an issue if the power plant is not located close to a pipeline system, Drolet noted.

So, as natural gas prices are now rising-up to $3.50/mmBtu (1 mmBtu ~ 1.1 mcf), coal prices have dropped to around US$52 per ton from US$78 per ton, the equivalent of US$2.03 per mmBtu.

RELATED: What Impact does Oil have on the Syrian Civil War?

The $1.40+ per mmBtu discount to natural gas this week is the largest relative price difference since August 2011, according to Reuters data—providing, on paper at least, lots of incentive for electricity producers to start switching back and reducing natural gas demand—potentially a lot.

However, the tipping price point for fuel switching depends on the utility and the age of the generator.

A Reversal for Natural Gas Prices?

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicts natural gas consumption, which is estimated to rise by 5% this year from 2011 on power generation demand, will reverse in 2013 as prices rise and utilities switch back to coal.

“Because of the projected increase in natural gas prices relative to coal, EIA expects the recent trend of substituting coal-fired electricity generation with natural gas generation to slow and likely reverse over the next year,” the agency said in its September short-term energy

“EIA expects that coal-fired electricity generation will increase by nine percent in 2013, while natural gas generation will fall by about 10 percent.”

The other side of the coin is voiced by Ziff Energy analysts in Calgary, Alberta, who argue rising volumes of natural gas – produced as associated gas with shale oil and natural gas liquids, as well as shale gas – will conspire to put a ceiling on prices, despite low drilling activity on both sides of the border.

“We see a lot of production in the system and many wells waiting for pipelines to be built and to connect to,” said Ziff's Senior Manager of Gas Services, Cameron Gingrich. “We’re seeing a big surge in Marcellus and other shale, so taking everything into account, I don’t see gas supply dropping any time soon - or prices rising.”

Drolet also suggests U.S. power generators could also move to natural gas because of looming emissions limitations by the Environmental Protection Agency.

Utilities such as Minnesota’s Xcel Energy said they would shut down smaller coal-fired power plants, saying natural gas-fired facilities were cheaper to build than installing costly pollution control equipment on existing coal units.

Ohio-based American Electric Power Company recently said it has burned a quarter less coal in the past four years, about 55 million tons in 2012 from 75 million tons in 2008, while doubling natural gas use.

“However, should natural gas, as some people believe, increase to an average of US$3.25, then price really becomes the primary reason, especially the more coal prices fall,” Drolet concludes.  And the market is there now.

By. Keith Schaefer, Publisher, the Oil & Gas Investments Bulletin

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Tom Servo on October 05 2012 said:
    good thing for us nat gas producers that Obama has decided to wage a war on coal production! Thank You Obama, and all you enviro's too! You've saved the Oil and Gas industry again!!!
  • Greg D. on October 07 2012 said:
    Disagree with the "easy as changing a nozzle" discussion--that's dangerously inaccurate. Most modern gas plants are gas turbines -- effectively, jet engines that are bolted to the floor (the thrust turns a turbine instead of pushing an airplane forward). No way those are accepting coal.

    The old, clunker-type steam plants that use gas in their boilers can indeed accomodate different fuels, but not coal (easier to, say, switch over to diesel). Coal boilers are very tempermental--coal from different mines requires a complete retuning, sometimes. And all the fuel handling infrastructure is vastly different -- coal piles, and conveyors, and that's only after you actually have the stuff on site. You need a rail link or a barge depot to get the stuff in (a typical coal plant can burn 4 trainloads (that's 400 train cars) of coal a DAY.

    the coal to gas switching will take the form not of moving a nozzle, but instead of flipping a swtich. The large coal plant that was operating at 10?pacity will get ramped to 90%, and vice-versa for the gas plant.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News