The Trump administration seems to be leaning towards allying with the oil refining industry in its fight against Big Corn and federal rules requiring the use of corn ethanol.
Reuters reports that the U.S. EPA apparently granted an exemption to Andeavor, a large oil refiner, from having to comply with blending requirements as part of the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) last month. The RFS requires refiners to blend biofuels, such as corn ethanol, into their refined fuels. If they can't or find it too costly, they are required to purchase credits.
The law dates back to 2007 under the George W. Bush administration, and is intended to cut crude oil demand and improve U.S. energy security. It has brought a windfall to corn country, although the environmental benefits have always been suspect.
The oil refining industry hates the law, because it forces them to pay for biofuels or pay for credits in lieu of blending ethanol into their fuel.
The latest waiver is notable because Andeavor is not in financial trouble, and could easily comply with the rules. The EPA gave the refiner an exemption at three of its smallest refineries, and as Reuters notes, it "marks the first evidence of the EPA freeing a highly profitable multi-billion dollar company from the costly mandates of the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard."
Typically, waivers are granted only in cases of financial hardship, and the move comes after a recent EPA decision to absolve Philadelphia Energy Solutions (PES), the largest refiner on the east coast, from some of its biofuels liabilities, which the company said helped force it into bankruptcy.
Related: Is This The Best Alternative To Lithium-Ion Batteries?
That move was significant, and it cracked open the door to potential changes in biofuels policy that the oil industry had long sought. The bankruptcy filing from PES sparked a heated battle between refiners and the ethanol industry. But the more recent exemption to a refiner that isn't in a financial predicament is a whole different matter.
Politically, it is a tricky situation for the Trump administration. President Trump has counted both the oil industry and Big Corn as allies. He has hosted representatives from both industries at the White House to hash out a compromise, but has repeatedly kicked the can down the road. However, if the waivers are anything to go by, it now appears that the EPA is siding with refiners.
A 2017 lawsuit opened the door to a more lenient process to obtain a waiver from the EPA, Reuters reported. Since then, applications for waivers have spiked - more than 30 refiners have sought exemptions from biofuels requirements this year, compared to 12 to 15 in a typical year, Reuters says.
The biofuels industry is crying foul, arguing that the exemptions come with no legal justification, and that the exemptions themselves undermine the biofuels industry by significantly devaluing the market for biofuels credits. After Reuters reported on the Andeavor waiver, which seems to be the first report on the secretive exemption, the prices for biofuels credits fell by 6 cents, or more than 10 percent. Related: Houthi Missile Hits Saudi Oil Tanker
Industrial agriculture is now getting hit on two fronts by the Trump administration - the EPA is undermining the biofuels market, and Trump's rapidly escalating trade war has resulted in Chinese tariffs on U.S. soybeans, a major U.S. export commodity.
It is no surprise that Iowa's powerful Republican Senator Chuck Grassley is incensed. Granting Andeavor "a free pass when other companies are required to follow the law of the land isn't just unfair, it may be illegal," Grassley said in a statement to Reuters. "It would also amount to a massive government handout to a big corporation that made billions in profits just last year."
It is unclear if Iowa and the ethanol industry can mount a defense. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has a long record of favoring the oil and gas industry, and the recent decisions in favor of refiners is consistent with that pattern. With President Trump unlikely to personally involve himself in this battle that has political costs either way, Pruitt's EPA seems likely to set the tone.
By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. More
Comments
It is about time this ethanol farce ended.
Corn based biofuel is a political product, not an energy saving nor an energy renewable product since it takes more crude oil to make and transport the corn based biofuel than it saves. Do not even try to talk to folks who have engines from law mowers to cars to boats who have had to deal with the corrosive effects the corn based biofuel has on their combustion equipment and/or fuel lines and gaskets. Regards.
Oh and we may not be able to pay you back your loan, thanks!
www.Fixourfuel.com
www.ethanolrfa.org/consumers/why-is-ethanol-important/
www.ethanol.org
www.growthenergy.org
I very much appreciate the author of this article for writing it.
For me its not about oil or ethanol its about clean air and how do we get there. If we can't really rely on the EPA, (to busy writing waivers for oil refineries), or the Oil Industry, (to busy clawing for every gallon of market share), get us cleaner air, than the only real answer is Tesla. I have held on to my Tesla stock, because I don't see any real hope in the oil industry worrying about cleaner air and less cancer from our fuel supply.
One of the biggest "prop ups" for the oil industry is preventing E15 and higher ethanol blends from being sold in most of the US from June 1 to September 16th each year. This is a plumb to the oil industry to keep these competing ethanol fuels out of the heavy summer driving and profit season for the oil industry. I guess the EPA doesn't want the oil industry to have to "compete" with a cleaner, cheaper and higher octane fuels. And that's part of why big oil doesn't have to lower their fuel prices. Right now ethanol is about 50 cents per gallon cheaper than gasoline. It is even cheaper than gasoline on an "energy equivalent" basis, not to mention that ethanol has an octane rating of 113. Any wonder why big oil hates clean burning ethanol?