Breaking News:

API Reports Small Builds in Crude, Fuel Inventories

Keystone Of Little Benefit To U.S. Says Obama

Image via WikiMedia Commons.

As expected, the U.S. House of Representatives has voted in favour of approving TransCanada Corp.'s (TSX, NYSE:TRP) controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline, hours after President Obama harshly criticized the project, saying it will not impact U.S. gas prices nor will create as many jobs as its supporters claim.

The House, where Republicans have a crushing majority, voted Friday 252-161 on a bill sponsored by Republican Rep. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, which is aimed at circumventing the need for Presidential approval.

Related: GOP Has Big Plans For Energy, But Are The Numbers Right?



Obama, who has repeatedly delayed deciding about the US$8 billion project, made clear he sees little value for the country he leads, adding he will veto any effort by Congress to take control of the approval process.

Bloomberg reports:

"Understand what this project is: It is providing the ability of Canada to pump their oil, send it through our land down to the Gulf where it will be sold everywhere else," the president said today during a visit to Yangon, Myanmar. "It doesn't have an impact on U.S. gas prices."

ABC News adds:

"If my Republican friends really want to focus on what's good for the American people in terms of job creation and lower energy costs, we should be engaging in a conversation about what are we doing to produce even more."



Keystone XL Pipeline - Overall route map. (Courtesy of TransCanada)

No one knows for certain what Obama will do, but the signs point to his rejection of the bill.

Related: Election Results Good News For Keystone XL Pipeline

"The administration, as you know, has taken a dim view of these kind of legislative proposals in the past," White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Wednesday. "I think it's fair to say that our dim view of these kinds of proposals has not changed."

This is the ninth time the pipeline, set to carry crude oil from Canada to the Gulf coast in Texas, has been voted on in the House following several environmental reviews and legal challenges to its route and politics.

The Senate is schedule to vote on the same bill next week.

By Cecilia Jamasmie

Source - www.mining.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage


Loading ...

« Previous: British Wind Farms Generate More Electricity Than The Grid Can Handle

Next: By Buying Baker Hughes, Halliburton Aims To Dominate US Fracking »

MINING.com

MINING.com is a web-based global mining publication focusing on news and commentary about mining and mineral exploration. The site is a one-stop-shop for mining industry… More

Comments

  • Bob - 19th Nov 2014 at 11:43am:
    If TransCanada wanted to improve its prospects in U.S., it might consider taking on a U.S. pipeline operator as a partner. Many of the U.S. pipeline operators are larger than TC and far more capable in terms of navigating domestic regulations and laws. If TC follows this scenario, it might also consider developing an MLP, which provide capital for company expansion and good dividends to investors. In that way, the U.S. would share in profits, getting something back for allowing the pipeline to traverse the entire country's heartland.
Leave a comment