Breaking News:

Exxon Completes $60B Acquisition of Pioneer

Energy Transfer Partners Will Not Reroute Dakota Access Pipeline

Energy Transfer Partners (ETP), the company heading the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline, said on Friday that it would not consider rerouting the controversial project, the Associated Press reports.

Instead, the energy transportation firm would be willing to meet with leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe to "ease" concerns regarding the environmental and cultural effects of the line, according to ETP's top executive.

CEO Kelcy Warren said the firm saw no alternative than to continue construction on its $3.8 billion pipeline on its planned route. Once it is complete, the line will cross five states and bring oil from North Dakota's reserves to Illinois.

"There's not another way. We're building at that location," Warren said, adding that Dakota Access construction had neared completion.

Warren invited Dave Archambault, the chairman of the Standing Rock tribe, to a bilateral meeting in order to address fears of the destruction of tribal history and the jeopardization of water resources.

"We already know what he's going to say - that this is the cleanest, safest pipeline ever," the chairman told the AP in response to the invitation. "What he doesn't know is that this is still an issue for Standing Rock and all indigenous people."

The pipeline project-stalled in a disputed segment near Lake Tahoe since September-is finishing up the rest of its construction by 1 December and hoping to start moving crude by early next year if granted permission by the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed with the missing segment.

On Monday, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said it would work with the tribe on a timeline "that allows for robust discussion and analysis to be completed expeditiously", Bloomberg reported.

Over 450 protestors who have supported the Standing Rock tribe's stance against the pipeline have been arrested in the past few weeks, mostly for trespassing and crimes related to demonstration activities.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage


Loading ...

« Previous: Forcados Shut-In Dashes Nigeria’s Hopes Of Raising Oil Output In 2016

Next: WoodMac Warns Half Of Big Oil Output May Be Hit By Carbon Costs »

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala is an American journalist based in Morocco. She completed her undergraduate coursework at the University of Texas at Austin (Hook’em) and reports on… More

Comments

  • Stel - 23rd Nov 2016 at 12:11pm:
    If the underwater pipeline is so absolutely "safe" from contamination, ETP should go back to the original plan of crossing the Missouri River north of Bismarck. The Missouri crossing is much narrower than at the dammed up Lake Oahe. If it's so save, it poses no more risk to the Bismarck population than to anyone else downstream -- and much less consternation and ill will. Besides, ETP will have certainly have plenty of financing as a result of the Sunoco merger.
  • Susan - 19th Nov 2016 at 4:04pm:
    Obama's injustice department circumvented the court ruling that the pipeline should proceed. We voted in President Trump to reverse such crimes.
  • Korey Jackson - 18th Nov 2016 at 5:19pm:
    Correction:
    The pipeline construction is stalled near the Missouri River crossing at Lake Oahe, not Lake Taho
Leave a comment