As the geopolitical drama between not only Iran and the U.S., but between the U.S. and its EU allies unfolds over Trump's decision to pull out of the 2015 Iranian nuclear deal, Iran is vowing that U.S. sanctions can't touch its oil exports. Of course, there is one caveat in that claim and that is based on possible EU refusal to adhere to U.S. stipulations over renewed Iranian sanctions.
"Tehran's oil exports to remain unchanged if the Iran nuclear deal is salvaged by the EU following the US withdrawal from the multinational accord," Zangeneh told reporters after his meeting with EU Energy Chief Miguel Arias Canete in Tehran over the weekend.
Zangeneh said that every new decision in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) needs unanimity, and added, "I believe that if the European Union helps us, the level of our oil exports will not change."
It's a bold statement even considering the geopolitical and economic heft that EU members can bring to the table over a collective refusal to adhere to U.S. sanctions demands over Iran.
EU asserts its independence
On Friday, the EU took its pivot away from U.S.-hegemony a step higher when it announced a series of steps to counter U.S. sanctions over Iran's nuclear ambitions, including enabling member states to make direct payments for oil to Iran's central bank as well as the revival of a 1990s blocking statute that allows EU firms to ignore U.S. sanctions without fear of reprisal from Washington.
The problem, however, with the EU's renewed sense of itself is that it likely won't work. For starters, the bottom line in any new tensions with Washington forces both the EU as a collective body and each adhering member to effectively choose either the U.S. or Iran. Given the influence, economic size and wide ranging political reach of the U.S., it may be hard to conceive EU members trying to push back against Washington.
Related: $80 Oil Could Kill Smaller Airlines
Even forward-looking French president Emmanuel Macron, that failed in his charm offensive during his recent Washington visit to dissuade Trump from pulling out of the Iranian nuclear accord, has stated that he doesn't want a trade war with the U.S. over Iran.
Any hope that a hawkish-Trump administration could possibly change its mind or be bullied by Europe, a region that has seen its political and economic influence wane in recent decades, is ill-founded.
On Monday, newly appointed U.S. secretary of State Mike Pompeo actually ratcheted the intensity of the ongoing rhethrotic up another notch. He threatened to impose the "strongest sanctions in history" ever on Iran.
Pompeo, Trump's former director of the CIA, demanded major changes from Iran and said America will not allow the country to develop a nuclear weapon: "Not now, not ever."
"This is just the beginning. The sting of sanctions will be painful," Pompeo said. "These will be the strongest sanctions in history when complete."
Pompeo also said that Tehran must stop developing ballistic missiles, release Americans who are being held in prisons in the country and stop support of militant and terrorist groups in the Middle East and beyond. He also called for a ban on a heavy-water reactor, which is the most basic way to develop nuclear energy.
Related: How Does Oil Impact Bond Markets
"Iran will never again have carte blanche to dominate the Middle East," he added.
Iran's pipe-dream
While Pompeo's remarks leave little doubt that the Trump Administration has Iran's nuclear ambitions and its growing influence in the Middle East, including the ongoing Syrian civil war, in its cross hairs, the impact, at least in the short to mid-term on oil markets will be muted.
Analysts predict that around 500,000 barrels of oil per day or higher could be removed from the market. Though marginal amounts of reduced supply can weigh heavily when markets are nearing an undersupply scenario, these barrels can be made up, at least in part, by Saudi Arabia who has indicated it would step in to make up for the loss of Iranian barrels, Russia and others, including U.S. shale oil production that has a feeding frenzy any time oil price s spike.
With global oil prices reaching three year highs, and with U.S. shale producers taping wells that see the bulk of its profits during the first few years of production as opposed to conventional wells that see profits spread out over a long time horizon, Iran's hope that the EU can rescue its oil exports and any hope that oil markets will miss its barrels may be just a pipe dream.
By Tim Daiss for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
I'm an oil markets analyst, journalist and author that has been working out of the Asia-Pacific region for 12 years. I’ve covered oil, energy markets… More
Comments
One, Iran will not lose a single barrel of oil exports. More than 75% of Iran’s oil exports go to China and the Asia-Pacific region while the remaining 25% go mostly to the European Union (EU). China, India and other Asia-Pacific region countries as well as the EU are not going to comply with US sanctions and reduce their imports of Iranian crude. While most major buyers of Iranian crude will continue to do so, Japan, South Korea and a few others might decide to comply with US sanctions and either reduce their imports of Iranian oil or shun them altogether. However, this will be more than offset by increased imports of Iranian oil by China, India and other Asia-Pacific countries as well as the EU.
Second, sanctions before 2015 worked against Iran’s oil exports because of a combination of the EU’s sanctions on global insurance companies insuring Iranian oil cargoes and US sanctions on banking making it difficult for Iran to receive payments for its oil imports in petrodollar. The EU is not going to walk away from the Iran nuclear deal and therefore it will not be imposing any sanctions on Iran thus further weakening US sanctions.
Third, Iran will be using the petro-yuan for payment for its oil exports to China and other Asia-Pacific region, the euro for its exports to the EU and barter trade with countries like Russia and India thus bypassing the petrodollar altogether and nullifying the impact of the sanctions. What is also significant is that the sanctions would almost certainly hasten the use of the petro-yuan in Iran’s oil transactions. And with the prospect of Saudi Arabia also considering some oil sales in petro-yuan, the end of the total domination of the energy market by the petrodollar is looking increasingly likely after almost a half-century of total domination. This will strengthen the economies of China and Russia and gradually erode US influence on global markets and adversely impact on the value of the dollar against other international currencies.
And while Saudi Arabia would welcome the opportunity to boost production to offset a so-called decline by Iranian oil exports, other OPEC and non-OPEC members such as Iraq and Russia respectively would like also to share in this benefit. In such a hypothetical situation, Saudi Arabia would have to balance the benefits from increased production against a possible collapse of the OPEC/non-OPEC production cut agreement. The production cut agreement buoyed by positive oil market fundamentals has pushed up oil prices to $80 a barrel. A collapse of the agreement risks bringing back glut to the market with very adverse repercussions for the Saudi economy which suffered most from the 2014 oil price. On balance, I believe Saudi Arabia will not risk the collapse of the production agreement which it worked tirelessly with Russia to bring into existence for a short-term benefit just to score points against Iran and also please President Trump.
The EU which is the biggest economic block in the world accounting for 23% of the global economy compared with 18% for the US is not without economic muscle. It will not kowtow to the United States. The EU is already reviving a 1990s blocking statute that allows EU companies to ignore U.S. sanctions without fear of reprisal from Washington.
A week ago, German Chancellor Angela Merkel defied a threat of trade war against Germany by President Trump if she did not cancel the Nord Stream 2 pipeline and started building its portion in its Baltic Sea port of Lubmin.
Moreover, the US belligerent behaviour is bringing Russia, China and the EU closer together.
Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
International Oil Economist
Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London