If any of you have seen my early writings on OilPrice.com, you would know I have been steadfast in my criticism of the media exaggerating the extent of the oil glut. Furthermore, I have also documented the pattern of exaggeration from both the EIA/IEA with their statistics.
I realize that no one is perfect, forecasting the future is notoriously difficult, and these entities have their difficulties in obtaining reliable and timely data to make accurate predictions. However, the IEA in particular has a track record of overstating oil supplies – even back in 1999 the agency was questioned for exaggerating a supply glut, and now it seems to have occurred again. Related: Chevron Protects Dividend, Cuts Another 36 Percent Off Spending
(Click to enlarge)
The chart above shows the “missing barrels,” unexplained oil volumes that have shown up in IEA data over time. John Kemp from Reuters, who has done some of the best coverage of the market, put together this data to illustrate the problem with the reported data. He recently wrote this piece, confirming all my suspicions of the past. In it he states the following:
"Of the 1 billion barrels reportedly produced but not consumed, roughly 420 million are being stored on land in member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Another 75 million barrels are thought to be stored at sea or in transit by tanker somewhere from the oil fields to the refineries. That leaves 550 million "missing barrels" unaccounted for, apparently produced but not consumed and not visible in the inventory statistics..."
Related: Six Reasons The Current Oil Short Covering May Have Legs
So, in other words, OVER HALF of the supposed glut that the IEA has reported is unaccounted for. Not 5 or 10 percent, but greater than a whopping 50 percent. Does anyone believe that half of the glut is just missing?
In the article John explains that it could be in hidden or unaccountable locations. But that doesn’t seem credible. It is hard to believe that HALF of the entire world’s excess supply cannot be justified with the data? At $40 oil, that is some $22 billion in oil that is squirreled away somewhere that millions of people simply don’t know where it is? Related: How Algorithmic Trading Makes Money On Energy
Yet does anyone care to even question such non-sense? No, of course not, just like every other government statistic that is taken at face value and traded on by headline-driven algorithms. There used to be a time when Wall Street did real research, but that appears to be gone now. Either demand has been understated by the IEA, or supply has been vastly overstated...any rational person would conclude the same.
Please view my video channel for further insight on this topic: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkA46F9sbOLfDVM0V17sZcw
By Leonard Brecken for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Can LNG Exports Help Ailing US Producers? Apparently Not
- The $9.2 Billion Bet Against OPEC Dominance
- Oil Rally Stalls As Storage Concerns Spike
what are your thoughts on bank intervention causing the oil price rally?
OIL WATCH Group
1994 massive short positions.
1997-98 700 million missing bbls.
2001-02 445 million missing bbls.
Now we have the next scam to keep prices low.
....certain data can be used against real "accounts" to be spent.
Does anyone stop to consider the flowing oil through a pipe causes friction that generates a "heat signature" for a sensor to pick up in real time..? How would that sensor be used to expose the Israel and Egypt gas deal from the very beginning..? (1977 marker)
Dare to wager the 550 Million barrels are "not" missing...?