• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 7 days If hydrogen is the answer, you're asking the wrong question
  • 13 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 11 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs

Breaking News:

Oil Prices Gain 2% on Tightening Supply

Economywatch

Economywatch

On EconomyWatch.com, you will find a comprehensive mix of news, analysis, reference, articles, data, charts and tools. These have been provided both by our core…

More Info

Premium Content

Is India About to Alter the World's Energy Future?

Is India About to Alter the World's Energy Future?

Since 1951, the Indian government has somehow managed to fail in every single attempt to reach its annual target of increasing the nation’s electricity production capacity. But while the nation continues to struggle with crippling blackouts and power shortages till today, an energy plan, conceived during the 1950s, may fundamentally alter the nation’s, and quite possibly the world’s, energy future.

Thorium, like its Norse god and Marvel superhero namesake, is expected to change the world.

Late last month, India suffered two consecutive power grid failures, which crippled the nation’s social and economic infrastructure: On July 30th, nearly 300 million Indians were affected by a massive blackout; and on the very next day, more than half of the population had no access to electricity after three of the nation's five power grids failed at lunchtime.

As engineers struggled to fix the world’s worst blackout in history, many analysts questioned whether the Indian government could meet the nation's increasing appetite for energy.

“The turmoil caused by the back-to-back grid failures is almost at the scale of a national emergency,” wrote Times of India journalist Ranjan Roy in an op-ed piece.

“A power crisis has been staring us at the face . . . and successive governments have failed to prevent a disaster,” he later noted.

According to a report by Bloomberg, India has missed every annual target to add electricity production capacity since 1951. India also faced a deficit of 8.5 percent on its base electricity load from 2010-2011; and many Indians now feel that government’s general inaction has compounded the nation’s energy problems.

“This is a telling commentary on the situation of the power sector in the country,” told Chandrajit Banerjee, Director General of the Confederation of Indian Industry, to Arab News. “Losses to businesses have been in hundreds of millions of US dollars, which pales into insignificance when compared to the difficulty that the people of the country have had to face."

"As one of the emerging economies of the world, which is home to almost a sixth of the world population, it is imperative that our basic infrastructure requirements are in keeping with India's aspirations," Banerjee added.

But, the Indian government insists that they are doing their best. In a report by the Economic Times, the Indian government blamed three states – namely, Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh – for the blackouts – as they had drawn power in excess of their allotted quota all through June and July. Then-Minister of Power Sushil Kumar Shinde, who has since been replaced by Veerappa Moily, also initially boasted about how quickly India managed to recover its power – comparing it to the 2008 power grid failure in the United States, which took four days to restore.

Still, interestingly enough, on August 22nd, the Indian government announced that they would restructure $35 billion of loans held by its utilities in order to boost their ability to supply electricity and avert another blackout.

And the biggest news for India’s energy future actually came earlier this year – before the blackouts even occurred – when the Indian parliament declared, in collaboration with its Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), that the nation would commence on the construction of its first-ever 300 MW (megawatt) thorium reactor by 2016-17.

Thorium-Fuelled Dreams

Thorium is a naturally occurring radioactive chemical element that is named after the Norse god of thunder, Thor. Discovered in 1828 by Swedish chemist Jons Jakob Berzelius, the 90th element on the periodic table has been described by Forbes as possibly “the biggest energy breakthrough since fire.”

According to Greentech Media, Thorium the potential to replace uranium as a ultra-cheap and ultra-safe nuclear energy source. Not only is the metal approximately three times as abundant as uranium in the earth’s crust, but it also contains up to 200 times the energy density.

“So why on earth are we using uranium?” asked Marin Katusa of Forbes. “As you may recall, research into the mechanization of nuclear reactions was initially driven not by the desire to make energy, but by the desire to make bombs.”

“The $2 billion Manhattan Project that produced the atomic bomb sparked a worldwide surge in nuclear research, most of it funded by governments embroiled in the Cold War. And here we come to it: Thorium reactors do not produce plutonium, which is what you need to make a nuke.”

After decades of relative obscurity however, Thorium is finally attracting increasing interest as an energy source from around the world. Apart from India, China has also announced its intentions to develop a thorium nuclear reactor, while Canada, Germany, Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States have all experimented with using thorium as a substitute nuclear fuel in existing nuclear reactors.
India’s thorium plans though are possibly the most well known and most promising of them all.

“With 40 percent of its population not yet connected to the electricity grid and an economy growing by about 8 percent each year, India’s need for a bold energy strategy is apparent,” wrote Phys.org. As early as the 1950s, Indian physicist Homi Bhabha had laid out a three-stage vision for the country’s nuclear programme, which would exploit the country's vast reserves of thorium – about 25-30 percent of the world’s total supply.

The nuclear plan experienced a hiccup post-1974, after the U.S. placed embargos on India for detonating its first nuclear bomb, but R K Sinha, the chairman of the AEC, now believes that his country is ready and capable of fulfilling Bhabha’s 60-year old vision.

“The basic physics and engineering of the thorium-fuelled Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR) are in place, and the design is ready," told Sinha, in an interview with the Guardian.

“Once the six-month search for a site is completed – probably next to an existing nuclear power plant – it will take another 18 months to obtain regulatory and environmental impact clearances before building work on the site can begin.”

The first thorium reactor, to be located either in Tarapur in Maharashtra or Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu, is expected to be a mainly research-based project that will lead the way for commercial ventures in the future. According to the Deccan Herald, the reactor will require 52 tonnes of fuel in its core initially – and just 4.7 tonnes of fuel per annum after – meaning that India can sustain on its thorium reserves for hundreds of years.

Sinha further noted that once India is able to complete to technology, it can beginning exporting similar reactors to smaller developing countries in the Middle East and East Asia.

"Many countries with small power grids of up to 5,000 MW are looking for 300MW reactors," he said. "Our reactors are smaller, cheaper, and very price competitive."

Most importantly however, India wants to supply a quarter of the nation’s energy needs from nuclear power by 2050, up from around three percent today.

According to the World Nuclear Association, the limited and environmentally harmful Coal still provides up to 68 percent of the nation’s electricity. India’s per capita electricity consumption figure is expected to double by 2020, and reach 5000-6000 kWh by 2050, and the nation’s supply of coal is unlikely to be able to match the demand.

"Due to past trade bans and lack of indigenous uranium, India has uniquely been developing a nuclear fuel cycle to exploit its reserves of thorium,” wrote the World Nuclear Association.

“Now, foreign technology and fuel are expected to boost India's nuclear power plants considerably. All plants will have high indigenous engineering content," the organisation added.

Still, sceptics– of Both India’s and thorium’s future – remain.

Writing for OpenDemocracy.net, Jayita Sarkar, a PhD candidate at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, said:

“The Indian atomic energy programme however, although operating on a grand scale, has till now fallen short of falling into place, and the AEC has not yet succeeded in meeting its own estimates of electricity production.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“A former chairperson of the Atomic Energy Commission in a personal interview once described the Indian strategic culture as characterized by jugaad, which is the colloquial Hindi for stop-gap solutions... Jugaad depicts not merely a practice of over-reliance on stop-gap solutions but also the stark absence of an operational strategy to deal with crises and managing risks. Sadly this pervades all aspects of Indian political, economic and social life,” she added.

According to Dr. Arjun Makhijani, the president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, Thorium may also not exactly be the “best bet for the future” of the world, especially when compared to renewable energy sources such as solar.

“Proponents of thorium are right in the sense that the liquid fuel reactor has a number of safety advantages, but it also has a number of disadvantages,” Makhijani said. “It doesn't solve the proliferation problem. It doesn't solve the waste problem, either. So every nuclear reactor, no matter what type, creates fission products, which are highly radioactive materials, some short-lived, some long-lived, to make energy.”

Germany’s “going to have a completely renewable system maybe by the time thorium reactors become commercial,” he noted.

India’s Energy Future

But despite what the sceptics say, "given India's abundant supply of thorium it makes sense for her to develop thorium reactors," noted Baroness Worthington of the Weinberg Foundation, which promotes thorium-fuelled nuclear power.

Science writer Matthew Chalmers of Physics World also believes that India’s energy future is unlikely to end at just thorium.

“In a modern context, Bhabha’s nuclear vision is part of a wider goal for clean, affordable energy also in form of solar, wind and hydroelectricity - all of which India is investing in heavily,” he wrote.

India has the world's largest thorium deposits and with a world hungry for low-carbon energy, thorium can prove to be India’s making.

Angela Saini, author of Geek Nation: How Indian Science Is Taking Over The World believes that “no story quite captures India's remarkable power to think long-term quite like that of thorium.”

“Quietly researching this fuel for decades, Indian scientists have waited for just the right moment to build their first thorium-powered nuclear reactor,” she said, in a piece for the Huffington Post.

“If the rest of the world believes India to be a sleeping elephant that is finally rising, then this tale reveals just how much more there will be to see when the elephant is fully awake.”

By Raymond Tham, EconomyWatch.com


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Robert Hargraves on August 24 2012 said:
    India's advanced heavy water reactor is interesting, but India should update it's 60 year-old uranium/plutonium/thorium three-step plan to include liquid fuel reactors. The compact liquid fluoride thorium reactor has the potential to generate electric power cheaper than from coal burning, dissuading nations from emitting ever more CO2 into the atmosphere. China is now pursuing this path. India has the skills to develop these molten salt reactors as well, but largely ignores the potential. A new book, THORIUM: energy cheaper than coal, describes the benefits and technology in detail, but in layman terms. It is described at http://www.thoriumenergycheaperthancoal.com
  • Roland on August 24 2012 said:
    “It doesn't solve the proliferation problem. It doesn't solve the waste problem, either." Typical binary thinking. It doesn't have to *solve* either of those problems, it just has to be better and cheaper than existing technologies. Its high-level waste has a much shorter halflife, and any plutonium generated is mostly consumed.
  • Gloria on August 24 2012 said:
    Anything that gets away from burning fossil fuels and coal, is a huge plus. Good for India.

    I watched a program on the National Geographic channel, on global warming. India is usually a hot dry country. I was astonished by the horrific flooding, that took place in their country. Same as Australia, and their terrible floods.

    At least in some country's, their country and their people come first. Not so in Canada. Greed comes first.
  • robertm on August 26 2012 said:
    The biggest issue in Liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR)is political.

    By all known scientific measurements... Liquid fluoride thorium reactor (LFTR) technology is the safest. cleanest. cheapest. energy source on planet earth.
  • atul on September 01 2012 said:
    Some of the greedy industrialist going to derail the effort put by PGCIL to establish extra-High Transmission Lines [765-kv and 800-kv HVDC] as those industrialist do not have technical capabilities to supply equipment for such transmission lines. So they want a ban in the form of very high protective import duties on import of equipment for such transmission lines by PGCIL, so that projects for such Extra-High voltage transmission lines may be abandoned and they may be able to sale lower grade equipment for lower voltage transmission lines. Another attempt to push backward the development of the country for handful persons ‘gains.
  • JoeR_AUS on September 12 2012 said:
    Interesting comment about Germany, they have 82m people so their solution is almost irrelevant to India's 1.3b

    Build it and put it onto the grid, then see how it goes. If it works the rest of the world will copy it. I dont see the down side unless you are happy with the power in India. If it does not work at least you tried and can move on knowing why it does not work.

    Cheers
  • Rad-man on October 02 2012 said:
    Dr. Makhijani is an idiot.

    “It doesn't solve the proliferation problem." Well, it doesn't create plutonium, which is what most nuclear weapons are made from. Thorium is useless for bombs. It does create Uranium 233, which is incredibly hard to work with, so much so that no nation on Earth has ever used it to make a bomb. So it kinda sorta does solve the problem.

    "It doesn't solve the waste problem, either." Well it produces 90% less waste than a Uranium fueled reactor, and the waste is radioactive for 200 years, rather than 10,000 years, but yeah, other than those two small diadvantages, I guess he's right.
  • danielpop on October 09 2012 said:
    A few years ago I was discussing about the promise and potential of India's thorium programme with a scientist/diplomat from a Western Europe country (prefer not to name which one but it's an easy guess - it does have huge stakes in the conventional nuclear industry).
    I expressed hope that the program could be brought to the industrial scale and that the technology could be eventually exported. This 'scientist' in a quite arrogant way declared that thorium does not have any future outside of India. So much so that nowadays China and other countries are significantly investing on it. Can't wait the day when I can send a f***u card to this 'unbiased' scientist.
  • Darian L Smith on November 09 2012 said:
    The world (nations and investors) should be helping India perfect this technology. The proliferation and waste problems have been shown to be eliminated.
    If the world could work together civilization could save decades, or even a century, compared to the competitive, resource-stingy approach.
    this is too important not to be a united effort.
    Just imagine a world that worked together to solve its energy problems.
  • Dr Jagabandhu Mishra,Bhubaneswar,India. on December 13 2012 said:
    The energy requirements of India is increasing very fast due to industrial growth and urban development. Growing domestic demand of the people also increased the energy requirement in India. The reserve of coal may last for 200 years if the present rate of coal consumption continues in future.Addition of power by hydroelectricity,solar,wind or bio energy may be less.So Thorium based nuclear reactors may help in increasing the electricity production in India.The development of Thorium based reactors by the Atomic Energy Commission is a blessing to the people of India and World.Let us hope for clean energy from such nuclear reactor to meet the energy needs of the people of India and World.
  • EURATOM on December 20 2014 said:
    Thorium is THE ONLY WAY as a viable alternative to traditional nuclear plants, and the future backbone of the energy sector along with other nimble forms of green energy! It will fuel the next evolution in human transportation providing the tremendous amounts of electricity needed to power most of future vehicles in the world. Once we get accustomed to work more with electricity in transportation also future trips to space will use electric and not oil based energy. When this technology will be in place The Earth will support a growing peaceful and industrious population, and with that large critical mass of population humanity will produce miracles every 5 years or so. So, hit the streets and tell your leaders that you want thorium!

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News