• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 15 hours One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 2 hours Oil Slips Further From 2019 Highs On Trade Worries
  • 1 hour Once Upon A Time... North Korea Abruptly Withdraws Staff From Liaison Office
  • 12 hours Modular Nuclear Reactors
  • 20 hours Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 2 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 1 day China's E-Buses Killing Diesel Demand
  • 1 day Trump sells out his base to please Wallstreet and Oil industry
  • 1 day China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 2 days Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 2 days Russian Effect: U.S. May Soon Pause Preparations For Delivering F-35s To Turkey
  • 2 days Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 24 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 1 day New Rebate For EVs in Canada
Canada’s Natural Gas Crisis Is Going Under The Radar

Canada’s Natural Gas Crisis Is Going Under The Radar

Canadian natural gas producers continue…

After Libya And Venezuela, Is This The Next OPEC Wildcard?

After Libya And Venezuela, Is This The Next OPEC Wildcard?

Anti-government protests in the North…

U.S. Greenhouse Emissions Tied To Aging Nuclear, Coal Plants

New projections from the Energy Information Administration find that the trajectory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) is highly sensitive to the operation of the nation’s nuclear and coal-fired power plants.

The rate and timing of retirements from these aging plants could dramatically impact how much carbon pollution the U.S. will emit decades from now.

CO2 Emissions from the electric power sector

U.S. emissions could be 4 percent higher by 2040 if more nuclear power plants are retired than expected, as natural gas moves in to fill the void. Similarly, if more coal plants are retired than expected, U.S. GHG emissions could be 20 percent lower than expected.

Many of the nation’s nuclear plants began operation in the 1960s and 1970s with an initial 40-year operating license – meaning most are near the end of their intended lives.

Related Article: Is Natural Gas No Better than Coal?

However, more than 75 percent have received 20-year renewals, which extends their operations into the 2020s and 2030s. Many plant operators are pushing for a second 20-year renewal, and how successful they are at convincing regulators and the public to allow such a move will largely determine how many plants remain in operation beyond the next two decades.

Coal-fired power plants face a darker future. Environmental regulations will most likely lead the industry into gradual decline, forcing many plants out of operation over the same timeframe.

The New York Times has reported on a push by environmental groups to preserve nuclear power in an effort to fight climate change. Backed by former members of Congress and former Obama officials, the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions argues in a new report that nuclear retirements could outpace the construction of renewable energy, resulting in higher net emissions for years. But the group also says that new EPA rules allowing carbon trading could extend the lives of nuclear reactors.

By Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News