• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 7 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 8 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 24 hours Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 10 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 5 hours Bankruptcy in the Industry
Will Namibia Become OPEC’s Newest Member?

Will Namibia Become OPEC’s Newest Member?

Namibia wants to join OPEC…

Europe Moves Forward with Major Hydrogen Projects

Europe Moves Forward with Major Hydrogen Projects

Large-scale hydrogen production schemes are…

Exxon, Chevron Also Seek ‘Small Refinery’ Biofuel Waivers

U.S. supermajors ExxonMobil and Chevron have asked the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to waive the obligations for biofuel blending for their smallest refineries—exemptions that are typically granted to small refiners under financial distress, Reuters reports, quoting sources familiar with the matter.

Under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), oil refiners are required to blend growing amounts of renewable fuels into gasoline and diesel. Refiners that don’t have the infrastructure to blend biofuels must purchase tradeable blending credits known as Renewable Identification Numbers, or RINs. The EPA has the authority to grant waivers from the renewable fuel standard to refineries whose oil processing capacity is below 75,000 bpd.

Those waivers have been traditionally given to refiners in hardship, but recently the U.S. Administration seems to have leaned to Big Oil in the battle with Big Corn that has been pitting lawmakers from the big oil states against those of the Midwest farm belt. EPA has reportedly granted an exemption to a large oil refiner, Andeavor.

According to two Reuters sources, the largest U.S. integrated oil companies that turn billions of U.S. dollars in profit have asked for exemption for their smallest refineries—Chevron for its 54,500-bpd refinery in Utah, and Exxon for its 60,000-bpd refinery in Montana.

An Exxon spokesman declined to comment on the report, but Chevron spokesman Braden Reddall—while declining to either confirm or deny his company’s request—told Reuters in a written statement:

“Several competitors have reportedly received exemptions from the RFS.” “If true, any refinery which has not been exempted from the RFS will be at a competitive disadvantage,” Reddall added.

The Big Oil-vs-Big Corn debate over the biofuels standards has heated as reports of such exemptions increased and as the EPA said it would not be disclosing the names of the refiners that had been granted waivers.

Several Republican senators, led by Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, commented in a statement on Thursday:

“Recent reports of EPA granting ‘hardship’ waivers meant for ‘small refiners’ to multibillion dollar oil refining corporations raise an embarrassing question. Is it the Administration’s position that companies making billions of dollars in profits are experiencing hardship?”

“EPA is hiding behind poor excuses about proprietary business information to shield big oil companies from public scrutiny,” the Senators said.

Related: Geopolitical Risk Sends Oil Soaring

Bob Dinneen, head of the Renewable Fuels Association, told Reuters, commenting on the report that Exxon and Chevron want waivers for their smallest refineries:

“For these two behemoth oil companies to claim economic hardship is downright offensive and insulting to the hard-working farm families and ethanol producers that depend on the RFS.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The previous administrations were giving out exemptions sparingly, but since Scott Pruitt took over as EPA Administrator in 2017, officials have signaled that if refiners submitted waiver applications for their smallest refineries, their requests would be granted, an executive at a refining company, who requested anonymity, told the Houston Chronicle earlier this month.

“Anyone with a brain submitted an application. The EPA was handing out those exemptions like trick or treat candy,” the executive said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Tom on April 16 2018 said:
    The Houston Chronicle had an article where an oil worker stated that the refineries were told by the EPA, that if they applied for the small refinery hardship waivers, they would be approved.

    The interview person said: Anyone with a brain applied for one, ... They were handing them out like Trick or Treat Candy.

    This should do wonders for the image of the oil industry, but who cares right, money in the bank! Cleaner air, from cleaner fuels with ethanol blended in is for idiots.

    I would have argued just the opposite: Anyone with a Brain would NOT have applied for the Trick or Treat, small refinery hardship waivers from the EPA.

    Once again the oil industry shows itself driven by pure greed, incapable self restraint or regulation.

    Industry Image is far more important than a few more bucks in the bank.

    So what's the future for big oil?
  • Conscience on April 14 2018 said:
    Just another good reason not to purchase Exxon or Chevron fuels. No conscience.

    The EPA's, Ask and ye shall receive attitude, toward the Oil Industry, (blatant favoritism), and It's stonewalling and foot-dragging toward the Biofuels Industry, speaks, no screams - volumes.

    It seems that the EPA is totally out of control, Trump needs do do something about it, unless He wants to become a banana republic, no rules.

    I'm a Republican, and I'm sickened by it.

    In the Midwest there is a saying - about life:

    Pigs get fed

    But Hogs get slaughtered.

    Waivers, Waivers, Waivers --- Scott Prewitt is just feeding - His Hogs!

    I hope so.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News