• 1 day PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 2 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 2 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 3 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 3 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

Half A Million Bpd At Risk From Geopolitical Firestorm

Geopolitical tensions are once again…

Alt Text

Saudis Lose Market Share To OPEC Rivals

OPEC members Iraq and Iran…

Cyril Widdershoven

Cyril Widdershoven

Dr. Cyril Widdershoven is a long-time observer of the global energy market. Presently, he holds several advisory positions with international think tanks in the Middle…

More Info

The Risk Of A Major Oil Outage Just Grew Substantially

Syria

The U.S. cruise missiles that were fired on Syria will have severe repercussions for the global oil market. The current price hike could be short-lived, but new confrontations are already on the horizon. Analysts are wrong to expect that Trump’s military action has improved the Middle East’s situation. The political risk premium will be higher for the foreseeable future as instability has increased.

Assad’s allies, Russia, Iran and Hezbollah, are openly confronting the U.S. and its allies. In a statement made by the joint command center, which is made up of Russia, Iran and militias supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, the U.S. has been warned that the missile attack crossed “red lines”. The pro-Assad group reiterated that any new aggression will be met by military force.

One of the main worries should be the cancellation by Russia of its cooperation with the U.S. (and others) with regards to operational security in the area. The risk of a military confrontation between the different armed players in the conflict has increased. Several NATO countries, such as Belgium, have already postponed further air force operations in Syria. The latter is playing into the hands of the respective armed extremists and Russian backed forces. It seems that this is not what Trump was intending.

At the same time, the Arab world also doesn’t seem to be totally supporting the U.S. attack. Iraq, as a perceived ally of Iran, indicated its worries while the region’s leading military and political power, Egypt, has openly criticized the military action. This in stark contrast to most of the GCC Arab countries. Trump’s unilateral military action has increased instability instead of decreasing it. As openly criticizing Washington is still not done, except by Cairo, leaders in Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, Doha and Baghdad, will be assessing the options and the possible negative repercussions of this U.S. action. Related: Wall St. Gears Up For The World’s Biggest Oil Trade

In the short term, the global oil market might not feel an effect of the actions. Syria’s position as an oil and gas producer is negligible. Since the start of the fights against Assad no real effects on global oil markets have been shown. Syria only produced around 25,000-33,000bpd in 2014/2015. The future impact, however, could be immense. Especially if there is a spill-over of the civil war to Jordan, Saudi Arabia, or Iraq. Trump’s actions have increased this option substantially.

Not only are the pro-Assad allies more inclined to act harsher to any third-party military interference in the country, but some Shi’a militias are openly preparing for operations against other non-Syrian players. Facts have emerged the last weeks of Shi’a militias buildup around the Golan Heights, bordering Israel, and on the Jordanian border. A potential military clash with these two countries could increase the political risk of a total war in the region substantially.

Looking at current Iranian statements, new actions outside of Syria as part of Iran’s proxy-wars are to be expected. Iran’s support of the Houthi rebels in Yemen is expected to be increased. Tehran will use this as a sign to Arabs and the West not to expect Iran just to sit and wait. Increased offshore military operations of Houthis or Iranians against ships in the Bab Al Mandab (Strait of Aden), could directly threaten the transport of 3.8 million bpd of crude oil and petroleum products. The attacks on Saudi navy vessels or Western ships last year have shown that Iranian-backed groups can.

When looking at a direct military confrontation between Iranian IRGC forces and U.S. military in Syria, an option that has increased substantially due to the missile attack, Iran could also act against shipping lanes in the Persian Gulf area. Strait of Hormuz operations will threaten global oil (17 million bpd) or LNG (30 percent) supplies. Iran’s NAVY or Special Forces are well equipped to stage these attacks on a very short notice. The effects could be devastating. Risk premiums will shoot through the roof if this is even on the table.

Iran could also have another option in mind. Not willing to have a direct confrontation with U.S.-led forces in Syria, Tehran could opt for a new proxy-war on the soft-belly of the anti-Assad coalition. A potential increased Iranian engagement in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain already is considered. Not only will it refocus the attention of Arab countries on a potential Shi’a conflict in Saudi’s Eastern Province, but also could lead to a further escalation of the ongoing unrest in Bahrain. Iran is one of the main backers of the Shi’a uprising still ongoing in Bahrain, not only a major asset for Saudi Arabia but also harboring one of the main U.S. military bases in the region. An explosion of unrest and instability in that particular corner of the Persian Gulf would directly push up risk premiums of crude oil and gas. Bahrain is almost the gate to Saudi’s Eastern Province or the world’s largest oil field, Al Ghawar. For Iran, this is a low-cost option but very effective. Related: Toshiba Can’t Shake Its Westinghouse Woes

To make matters worse, the current call for the removal of Syria’s president Bashir Assad, which was vented openly by Washington and several European leaders, will push the pro-Assad side to dig in even more. Statements currently heard by politicians in Washington or military leaders in the Pentagon to target a potential break-up of Syria on sectarian/religious lines is even more destabilizing to the whole region than ever before. Syria’s break-up or division will not only be a precedence of unknow order, but also support already existing calls for independence in other Arab countries (including Iran). Iraq, Bahrain, Yemen and Iran, will not be supporting these devastating political ideas. Saudi Arabia (with a vast Shi’a minority) and Turkey, both until now supporting Western military actions, will be against it full heartedly. Turkey’s leadership cannot survive with a possible Kurdish nation next to its borders. Military intervention by Ankara will be for sure a cause of concern.

Looking at all the above, the main question to be answered is “what was Trump planning when signing off a missile attack?” Until now it seems to be a purely political move to support his own domestic position at the expense of the Syrian conflict. No real end-goal has been stated by either party involved. This has severe repercussions for the Middle East and the global energy markets. The current stalemate in Syria, which is only increased by the military actions of Washington at present, will force Iran, Hezbollah and possibly even Russia, to show their own military power. Further escalation of the Sunni-Shi’a conflict could be on the horizon, directly threatening oil and gas operations and supplies. Eyes should still be on Washington, as the Trump diplomacy is unpredictable. After Syria, it is only a very small lap to have harsher sanctions on Iran or outright military confrontations in the Persian Gulf arena. Instability will be part of future oil price scenarios, more than we have had the last 2-3 years.

One more confrontation in the region and the historical bandwidth of $5-10 per barrel risk premium could become fact once again.

By Cyril Widdershoven for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Tom on April 12 2017 said:
    The muslim world has been fighting amongst themselves for centuries. The strike in Syria was purely humanitarian in nature and explicitly as a result of chemical weapons - something the previous administration failed to address either militarily or politically. What are the repercussions of the strike long term? I can guarantee you the muslim world will no longer view the US as a pacifist by-stander. Likewise, any action ANY nation takes to destabilize the regions will be viewed as a threat to US national interests and the response will be measured and swift.

    We know who the players are in the various conflicts around the globe. If you have the enough information to post this article, then rest assured, the intelligence agencies have even more detail from which to make decisions on when to communicate when to wipe someone off the planet. Any nation that attacks US vessels had best be prepared for war. Claiming it's some splinter group operating on their soil will not prevent a massive retaliatory strike to prevent further aggression against US interests. We are the nation of talkers with no backbone no longer. America is back.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News