• 1 hour Gunmen Kidnap Nigerian Oil Workers In Oil-Rich Delta Area
  • 3 hours Libya’s NOC Restarts Oil Fields
  • 5 hours US Orion To Develop Gas Field In Iraq
  • 3 days U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 3 days Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 3 days Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 3 days Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 3 days Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 3 days TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 3 days Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 3 days Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 4 days Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 4 days Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 4 days Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 4 days OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 4 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 4 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 4 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 5 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 5 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 5 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 5 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 5 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 5 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 5 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 5 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 6 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 6 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 6 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 6 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 6 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 6 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 6 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 7 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 7 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 7 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 7 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 7 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 7 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Could This Technology Be The Innovation The Oil Industry Needs?

Could This Technology Be The Innovation The Oil Industry Needs?

Something big is happening in Utah, in Asphalt Ridge, where geologists believe there is potentially 1 billion barrels of oil recoverable from oil sands, and where a new breakthrough technology has proven cost-effective at producing ‘clean’ oil sands in a win-win situation for both investors and environmentalists.

Asphalt Ridge is part of the prolific Green River Formation, which spans Utah, Wyoming and Colorado and may hold some 3 trillion barrels of recoverable oil. Utah is the heart of this waking beast, with estimated in-place tar sands oil resources of 32 billion barrels. And at the heart of the heart is Asphalt Ridge, which is thought to contain nearly a billion barrels of oil on its own.

But Utah is more than just a part of the resource-rich Green River Formation—it’s also the proving ground for the latest technology that ensures we get the most out of our oil sands without leaving behind the toxic trailing ponds that have plagued Alberta’s industry.

The new technology—patented by MCW Energy Group (traded in the US under MCWEF and in Canada under MCW.V)—relies on a solvent that uses no water and produces no waste or pollutants, and produces at $27-$30 per barrel.

Toronto-based MCW Energy has been operating its Asphalt Ridge oil sands project since October 2014, and for the past five years it has been working closely with Utah's Responsible Energy Development program to meet—and in some cases exceed—environmental requirements.

Beginning in January 2015, the Asphalt Ridge project has been producing 250 barrels per day of clean oil sands, against the backdrop of intensifying protests by environmentalists who are decrying other oil sands projects in the state for dangerous pollutants.

The Asphalt Ridge technology may be exactly what Utah needs to produce oil from oil sands without tapping into the state’s already sparse water supplies, without turning out dirty oil for potentially catastrophic pipeline leaks, and without returning contaminated sand to the ground. The process is also not reliant on high temperatures or pressures—and it doesn’t emit any greenhouse gases, according to MCW CEO Dr. R. Gerald Bailey, former ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) president of Arabian Gulf operations.

A key difference between Utah and Alberta is the nature of the oil sands itself. Utah’s oil sands are oil-wet as opposed to water-wet, which means they can simply be scooped up and processed with the new solvent. The oil is separated and the sand is returned to the ground 99 percent cleaned.

Not only is this clean oil sands project coming out at $27-$30 per barrel in prices that rival OPEC’s average, but once financing goes through for a second 5,000-barrel-per-day plant at the nearby Temple Mountain, the cost per barrel is expected to be reduced to $20.

On 8 September 2015, MCW closed the acquisition of TMC Capital, LLC, giving it the Temple Mountain Project oil sands lease. This project will supply more oil sands for Asphalt Ridge and also serve as the location for the company’s planned 5,000-bpd extraction plant to further drive down costs.

In the meantime, while shale producers are taking a nose-dive in the market, experts estimate that production using this new technology in Utah is more profitable than shale oil currently being produced, and more profitable than any other oil sands project in North America.

It costs about $55 per barrel to produce oil sands in Alberta, compared to Asphalt Ridge’s approximately $30 for clean oil sands. We could even be looking at a shift in focus to clean oil sands and away from Utah’s more expensive-to-produce shale, which had earlier attracted major players such as Marathon Oil (NYSE:MRO), EP Energy Corporation (NYSE:EPE) and Newfield Exploration Co. (NYSE:NFX).

An independent Chapman Engineering Report concludes that MCW’s extraction technology is an innovation with no rivals, particularly from an energy-efficiency perspective.

For investors, today’s emerging playing field is all about de-risking production in terms of regulatory delays and environmental hiccups while at the same time coming in at a cost that can survive the oil price slump. At the end of the day, the Asphalt Ridge project seems to tick both of these boxes as depressed oil prices and environmental activism push new technological innovations harder and faster.

OilSands

By James Burgess of Oilprice.com

Legal Disclaimer/Disclosure: MCW Energy is an Oilprice.com client. This document is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to purchase or subscribe for any investment. No information in this Report should be construed as individualized investment advice. A licensed financial advisor should be consulted prior to making any investment decision. We make no guarantee, representation or warranty and accept no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or completeness. Expressions of opinion are those of Oilprice.com only and are subject to change without notice. Oilprice.com assumes no warranty, liability or guarantee for the current relevance, correctness or completeness of any information provided within this Report and will not be held liable for the consequence of reliance upon any opinion or statement contained herein or any omission. Furthermore, we assume no liability for any direct or indirect loss or damage or, in particular, for lost profit, which you may incur as a result of the use and existence of the information, provided within this Report.




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News