• 4 minutes End of Sanction Waivers
  • 8 minutes Balancing Act---Sanctions, Venezuela, Trade War and Demand
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 14 minutes What Would Happen If the World Ran Out of Crude Oil?
  • 4 hours New German Study Shocks Electric Cars: “Considerably” Worse For Climate Than Diesel Cars, Up To 25% More CO2
  • 5 hours ..
  • 10 hours Summit: Kim, Putin To Meet Thursday in Russia’s Far East
  • 3 hours Countries with the most oil and where they're selling it
  • 10 hours Iran Sabre Rattles Over the Straights of Hormuz
  • 4 hours Section 232 Uranium
  • 2 hours Nothing Better than Li-Ion on the Horizon
  • 18 hours Don't Climb Onto the $80+ Oil Price Greed Roller Coaster, Please.
  • 8 hours China To Promote Using Wind Energy To Power Heating
  • 3 hours How many drilling sites are left in the Permian?
  • 6 hours Deep Analysis: How China Is Replacing America As Asia’s Military Titan
  • 12 hours "Undeniable" Shale Slowdown?
Alt Text

This Legendary Shale Basin Just Broke Its 2011 Production Record

The Haynesville Shale in northeastern…

Alt Text

U.S. Energy Exports To Mexico Go Into Overdrive

Putting aside difference over immigration…

Alt Text

The Tipping Point In Trump’s Quest For Energy Dominance

Trump’s latest executive order to…

Jen Alic

Jen Alic

 

More Info

Trending Discussions

Ukraine Crushed in $1.1bn Fake Gas Deal

Certainly the folks at Gazprom are having a good snicker, reveling in the mockery that has been made of what should have been a landmark Ukraine-Spain gas deal that would have loosened Russia’s gas grip on Kiev.

Everyone wondered how Russia would respond to Ukraine’s attempt at gas independence. But this is what happens when you mess with Gazprom.

It was a horrible moment for Ukraine on Monday—all the more horrible because the whole event was televised—when the historical $1.1 billion deal it was about to sign with Spain’s Gas Natural Fenosa turned out to be fake.

Why was the deal historical? It would have secured $1.1 billion in investment for the construction of Ukraine’s first liquid natural gas (LNG) terminal on the Black Sea and a pipeline connecting the country’s vast gas network to the terminal.   

More to the point, this would enable Ukraine to import by tanker up to 10 billion cubic meters of European gas at a price 20% cheaper than Gazprom. Even more to the point, it would be a major first step toward reducing Ukraine’s dependence on Russia.

Related Article: Europe Hot for Algerian Shale Gas

The deal was that investors had apparently signed agreements through a newly formed consortium for the construction of the $1.1 billion LNG terminal.

Here’s how the ill-fated signing ceremony went down:

While Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov and Energy Minister Yuriy Boyko were cutting the ribbon on the construction of the terminal in a live televised ceremony, the country’s investment chief, Vladislav Kaskiv, was attending the official investment signing ceremony elsewhere, also via live video feed. This is where walls caved in very suddenly.   

Signing on behalf of Fenosa was one Jordi Sarda Bonvehi. At the 11th hour, Fenosa let it be known that they have no idea who Bonvehi is and that he certainly does not represent the company in any way. Fenosa apparently had no idea it was signing a landmark agreement with Ukraine.

Kiev was necessarily taken aback, and Bonvehi remained conveniently silent at the signing ceremony once the news broke out. 

Of course, what no one knows is how Ukrainian authorities were led to believe—during multiple rounds of negotiations—that Bonvehi was a Fenosa representative.

The story being bandied about by authorities in Kiev is now that Bonvehi was under the impression that Fenosa would sign the deal with Ukraine and that he would be given the authority to sign the deal retroactively.

Related Article: South Stream Pipeline will Increase Gazprom's Control over Europe

But Fenosa denies it has ever considered such a deal and continues to deny any relationship at all with Bonvehi.

So where does that leave us? It leaves Ukraine in the lurch. There is no way it can fund this terminal on its own, despite its claims to the contrary. We probably don’t have to look much further than Gazprom and the Ukrainian oligarchy to find where this beautifully crafted charade was hatched.

In the meantime, Bonvehi—if such a person of that name even exists—remains elusive. No one knows who he really is or who he really works for.

More than anything, it’s an advertisement for due diligence.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Kiev on December 04 2012 said:
    Everyone knows that they were just trying to steal a Billion Dollars and got busted.... it was fake from the start.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News