With China's Fourth Plenum meeting of its ruling Communist Party having ended in October and the U.S. 2020 presidential election campaign gathering pace, both sides have their reasons to unveil some sort of progress in the long-running trade war between them. Such an announcement had been expected around the time of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meetings scheduled for 16-17 of November but when Chile cancelled the event the timing has become more fluid. The recent tentative statements that U.S. and China will roll back tariffs on each other's goods incrementally as they continue to negotiate a broader trade deal were sufficient to push crude oil futures lower for a short while. However, the reality is that any announced trade deal between the two sides in the current political environment will be short-lived, fractious, and volatile for all asset classes, including oil.
For China, the next date that will be of key concern is the 18th of November, the point at which the licensing that permits China's Huawei Technologies to buy components from U.S. companies to supply existing customers is set to expire. This follows the U.S. government's blacklisting of Huawei in May on the allegations that the Chinese technology giant is involved in activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. At the same time, the U.S. added another 46 Huawei affiliates to the 'Entity List' (to a total of more than 100 Huawei entities) that comprises companies effectively banned from doing businesses with U.S. firms. "Such is the centrality of U.S. semiconductor firms in manufacturing chains that a ban by Washington could effectively cut off global semiconductor supplies," Rory Green, Asia economist for TS Lombard told OilPrice.com earlier this week. "The result would be a modern day equivalent to the Japan oil embargo that was imposed by the U.S. [on August 1941, in response to Japanese actions in then-Indochina] and that was a key prompt for the attack on Pearl Harbour," he said. "For hawks in the Chinese government, the U.S. actions against Huawei and its related companies would be very near to a declaration of war and if the U.S. does not grant another extension to the Huawei ban then the bad feeling this will generate in China will be enormous," he added. Related: The World's Biggest EV Market Braces For Another Crippling Blow
This said, China's economy is currently at a delicate potential inflection point, with economic growth set to drop below the key six per cent psychological level in the fourth quarter and beyond, for the first time in almost 30 years. Moreover, its options to avoid this are much more limited than at any time before. "President Xi Jinping remains convinced that another round of excessive debt creation - which is the upshot of the massive stimulus measures that we've seen in the past - could be fatal to China and more importantly to the regime," Green said. "Additionally, for their part, China's monetary authorities have been reluctant to cut interest rates, probably because they fear a low interest rate environment is bad for domestic banks, which are under pressure both to restructure their balance sheets and to reduce leverage and funding risks," he added.
The game-plan right now for China, then, is to continue to make the right sort of placatory noises to the U.S. over broad measures of cooperation whilst actually conceding very little, and waiting to see the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. This stalling approach by China is the reason why Beijing's trade negotiating team - according to various off-the-record comments from the U.S. side - talk in 'general terms of principles and parameters rather than specific policy measures'. "Basically, the Chinese are hoping either that Trump doesn't win or that he doesn't win across both Houses [Senate and Representatives], which will limit his room for manoeuvre in future negotiations, but until then China is just playing the game, stringing out the talks and conceding as little as possible whilst trying to get as many tariffs dropped as it can," said Green.
In the interim, China's official state-run press agency, Xinhua, stated after the last major U.S.-China meetings in October that agriculture and exchange rates had moved up in the list of topics noted by the Chinese side as having been discussed. Those topics were the last two among the six that emerged out of talks last February, but they moved up into first and third place, respectively, following the October talks, while intellectual property protection remained in second place. "Beijing has always been willing to yield on agriculture purchases and exchange rate policy, as renminbi stability and soybean purchases are actually aligned with China's national interests, so it is now highly likely these 'concessions' will form part of the prospective 'phase one deal' that could be signed," highlighted Green. Related: Canadian Oil Prices Crash After Keystone Spill
The U.S. position is similar to that of China's, although Trump's approach is more skewed to political considerations than classical economic ones. Trump needs to de-escalate the trade war with China, at least to the extent that it is no longer perceived to be meaningfully damaging U.S. economic growth. According to the statistics, since World War I, the sitting U.S. president has won re-election 11 times out of 11 if the economy was not in recession within 24 months ahead of an election. Conversely, presidents who went into a re-election campaign with the economy in recession lost five out of seven times. Up until very recently, many of the smarter investment houses were predicting a fifty per cent chance of an outright U.S. recession within the coming 12 months. In recent, weeks, though, this figure has improved in favour of Trump, with Goldman Sachs now putting the risk at 24 per cent, Morgan Stanley 'around 20' per cent, and Barclays at less than 10 per cent.
A deal with China - almost no matter how superficial in the first instance - is also key to Trump's ability to maintain his Republican support in the Senate that he needs to avoid impeachment and he is highly aware of how big the trade war plays in the news and in the markets. During his meeting with China's Vice Premier, Liu He, Trump said: "Every time there's a little bad [trade war] news, the market would go down incredibly. Every time there was a little bit of good news, the market would go up incredibly. And yet, other news that was also very big, the market just didn't really care. They just seemed to care about the deal with [the] USA and China, and that's okay with me." On a broader electoral note, being seen to be tough on China is becoming even more appealing to U.S. voters with a recent survey by the non-partisan U.S. think tank, Pew Research Center, in Washington, showing that only 26 per cent of U.S. citizens had a favourable view of China, down from 38% the year before.
By Simon Watkins for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
Simon Watkins is a former senior FX trader and salesman, financial journalist, and best-selling author. He was Head of Forex Institutional Sales and Trading for… More
Comments
A sticking point, however, is China’s demand that the United States should roll back
some of the tariffs it has slapped on Chinese exports. Still, China could afford to outwait the United States on tariffs having already won the war. And contrary to claims otherwise, China’s economy is growing at a healthy 6.1% rate this year. This is a spectacular achievement for a maturing economy.
For China, the litmus test is agreement by the United States to renew the licensing that permits China’s Huawei Technologies to buy components from U.S. companies to supply existing customers before it expires on the 18th of November. This follows the U.S. government’s blacklisting of Huawei in May on the allegations that the Chinese technology giant is involved in activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. For hawks in the Chinese government, the U.S. actions against Huawei and its related companies would be very near to a declaration of war.
If, however, President Trump opts not to renew the Huawei licensing, China could retaliate with very powerful weapons of its own.
The first is offloading its holdings of US Treasury bills estimated at $1.3 trillion. That will immediately cause a steep devaluation of the dollar thus leading to a serious exacerbation of both the US budget and US outstanding debts.
The second weapon is for China to impose an embargo on the supply of rare earth minerals to the United States. That could potentially cripple large swathes of US industry from smartphones, turbines, lasers, missiles, advanced weapon sensors, stealth technology and jamming technology to name but a few. By the time the United States has found alternative supplies, the damage would have been done.
However, the escalating trade war is not principally about oil or China’s trade surplus and alleged Chinese malpractices. It is about the petro-yuan undermining the supremacy of the petrodollar and by extension the US financial system, Taiwan, refusal by China to comply with US sanctions against Iran, China’s overwhelming dominance in the Asia-Pacific region and its sovereignty claim over 90% of the South China Sea, the new order in the 21st century and above all fear of the US losing its unipolar status.
The great rivalry between the United States and China will shape the 21st century. It is a truth universally acknowledged that a great power will never voluntarily surrender pride of place to a challenger. The United States is the pre-eminent great power. China is now its challenger.
And while China could emerge the less hurt from a continuation of the trade war with America, there could be no winners. Both titans will be losers with the global economy the biggest loser by far.
Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
International Oil Economist
Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
Note that the Democrats in the USA scream and screech every day about Trump but never, ever criticize his actions with China. Everyone is in agreement. China's grabbing of the Spratly Islands was a wake-up call and they are now the no.1 threat that needs minimising. Trade is the only safe way to do it. This "trade war" is not intended to be ended soon.