• 3 minutes War for Taiwan?
  • 7 minutes How China Is Racing To Expand Its Global Energy Influence
  • 10 minutes Is it time to talk about Hydrogen?
  • 2 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 20 hours Mail IN Ballot Fraud
  • 3 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 5 hours Supreme Court rules against Cuomo's coronavirus limits
  • 2 days Michael Moore Cranking Up Planet of the Humans Again
  • 1 day Censorship in USA
  • 16 hours “Consumers Will Pay For Carbon Pricing Costs” by Irina Slav
Peru’s Oil Industry Is Engulfed In Crisis

Peru’s Oil Industry Is Engulfed In Crisis

Peru’s oil industry is facing…

Three Key Differences Between Biden And Trump On China

Three Key Differences Between Biden And Trump On China

Tensions between China and the…

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani

Alex Kimani is a veteran finance writer, investor, engineer and researcher for Safehaven.com. 

More Info

Premium Content

The Shift Away From Fossil Fuels Is Inevitable Regardless Of Who Is Elected

The shift from fossil fuels to renewables is in full swing, and that inexorable march will carry on in the coming years regardless of who sits at the Oval Office. That's the verdict by energy and commodities navel-gazer S&P Global Platts, which says the transition to green energy will move ahead full steam irrespective of whether Trump or Biden carries the day come 3rd November.

That's in large part due to renewable energy sources such as solar and wind becoming more cost competitive with traditional fuels, while more novel fuels such as hydrogen are also becoming cheaper and gaining traction. Over the past decade alone, solar generation costs have fallen nearly 90% and wind by nearly 70% thanks to massive advances in technology. 

Renewables have also been proving to be remarkably resilient, being the only energy sector that has continued to grow despite the global pandemic.

Still, the U.S. energy sector could look radically different depending on the outcome of the elections.

Energy sector under Trump

S&P Global Platts notes that the energy transition has "clearly been moving forward on a regional basis," despite lacking clear endorsement at the federal level under Trump. This trend is likely to continue even if Trump is reelected, but it would mean slower growth for green energy.

In fact, Trump has been openly hostile towards renewables, going as far as making baseless claims that wind turbines depress property values and cause cancer. His climate denialism and withdrawal of the US. from the Paris Climate Accord have been equally baffling, to say the least, with the country set to officially withdraw from the deal just one day after the 2020 presidential election due to a quirk of timing.

"I found it sickening, it was mendacious from start to finish. I was furious … because here we have this really important thing and here's this joker who doesn't understand anything he's talking about. It was a fraud," Todd Stern, US's chief negotiator of the Paris Agreement in 2015, told The Guardian after Trump's withdrawal speech.

Related: Alberta Set To Lift Mandatory Oil Production Cuts In December
Of course, the real reason why Trump is so much against renewables is because they are killing another energy sector he dearly loves: Coal. But in fact, it's natural gas, not renewables, that has been doing the most damage to coal over the past decade as natural gas plants continue to replace coal plants. 

However, renewable energy and batteries are likely to finish it off--especially if Biden takes over.

Source: The Guardian

Biden's $5 trillion renewables plan

"The federal government could make that transition happen more quickly if it had a unifying, coherent policy framework for the power sector." 

That's according to Platts, which notes that the renewable energy sector will receive a major boost under Biden thanks to his ambitious $5 trillion clean energy plan. Biden has pitched a $5 trillion-plus climate proposal that he says would enable the U.S. to achieve net zero status by 2050.

Related: U.S. And Canadian Oil Rig Counts Continue To Rebound

Biden's plan calls for $1.7 trillion in federal spending over the next decade, with the balance coming from private sector investments. He has proposed eliminating existing fossil fuel subsidies while also repealing Trump's corporate tax bonanza to cover the taxpayer costs.

"Science tells us that how we act or fail to act in the next 12 years will determine the very livability of our planet. That's why I'm calling for a clean energy revolution to confront this crisis and do what America does best--solve big problems with big ideas," Biden has said in a statement.

According to Platts, coal's current 21% share of the generation mix is likely to fall to just 5% by 2030, assuming a federal carbon price starts in 2026. In this scenario, wind and solar generation could increase from the current 11% of the generation mix to 30% in 2030.

Indeed, mothballing half of the country's coal-burning electricity plants will open the doors for 122,000 megawatts of wind and solar while also cutting greenhouse gas emissions by some 600 million metric tons by 2025.

An aggressive push towards 100% clean energy could also save Americans as much as $321bn in energy costs, according to a new study.

The latest poll shows Biden holding a commanding lead nationally, including leading in nearly every swing state. He, however, has warned that Trump could still pull a fast one by delegitimizing the outcome of the elections because "... that's how he plays.

Oil demand will plateau in 2030

Platts did not update its oil outlook, but a recent report by another energy expert paints a bleak picture.

According to a report by the International Energy Agency (IEA), oil demand will plateau in 2030 and enter a phase of terminal decline, thus giving renewables the ascendancy.

By Alex Kimani for Oilprice.com 

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Arch Region on October 26 2020 said:
    Given that four years of Trump brought 90% drop in the Dow Jones Coal Index and 40% down of the Dow Jones Oil Gas Index can the next four years be any better? Especially now that solar and wind are now the least expensive energy resources and various designs of fusion are around the corner (this time really not in the proverbial fifty years.) Fossil fuels time is up. Can four years of Biden be much worse than the last four years?

    Three factors will seal the destiny of fossil fuels:
    a) HEALTH COSTS - how long do you think people will continue subsidizing fossil fuels with their kids asthma and grandpas bronchitis? There was a time that there were no alternatives to keeping the lights on. But now we have clean renewable and healthful energy alternatives;
    b) COSTS - Already in many markets fossil fuels are too expensive even before we factor in the health costs. Loss of market share will only aggravate this cost disparity as fossil fuels will be exponencial prized out as the scale of exploration, extraction, refining, and distribution shrinks.
    c) GLOBAL CLIMATE HOLOCAUST.
  • Carlos Everett on October 26 2020 said:
    I would like to invite you to come and visit my home in Katy, Texas. 14 years ago when I built this home, I looked into solar but it was to expensive. You make a statement that solar energy costs have been reduced by 70- 90%, so I have been reading statements like this for the past 6 months, that solar costs, are way down. You are not the only journalist publishing this garbage, but i want to be fair to you.

    I thought, it has been years since I checked on costs to install at my home in Katy, so I requested 3 bids and the two most practical would cost $90,000 after incentives. My home is not shaded, has many different angles to access the sun and is picture perfect for solar. Yet even though my average bill is $550 per month, the loan to pay off over 20 years would be $589, which does not include maintenance.

    Again, i would even extend the invitation to let you talk on a conference call with the various installers with me, so that you could write an article telling the truth about whether solar can compete with natural gas or oil.

    I truly hope you being on the phone call could convince yourself to either start questioning, whether solar costs have been reduced or that you can find an honest company out there will install and start saving me, even 50% of my current bill. Care to put your pen or keyboard on the line and back up these statements of 70-90% reduction in solar costs???

    Again I want you to prove me wrong!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • FrankBilek on October 27 2020 said:
    I am a strong proponent of the awareness for changing investment and production strategies of hydrogen. However, why do the overwhelming majority of such “news” articles have to be overwhelming political opinion? This topic is about energy economics. Cut the politics, as your article title alludes.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News