X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 74-89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 9 hours America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 2 hours IS SAUDI ARABIA SENDING A MESSAGE TO BIDEN
  • 9 hours U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 2 days Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 2 days Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 2 days Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 2 days Here we go - again: plug-in hybrids cost motorists more than what they were told
  • 5 hours Top Conservative Lawyer Says Trump Can Stand Trial
  • 6 hours “Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again” By Tsvetana Paraskova
  • 2 days An exciting development in EV Aviation: Volocopter
Clean Energy Investing Is Becoming A Bubble

Clean Energy Investing Is Becoming A Bubble

Investment in clean energy has…

Bloomberg’s Hottest Energy Picks For 2021

Bloomberg’s Hottest Energy Picks For 2021

2020 was a particularly tough…

Are America’s Largest Oil Companies Really Going Green?

Are America’s Largest Oil Companies Really Going Green?

America’s largest oil companies, ExxonMobil,…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Russia And China’s Growing Energy Relationship

Russia’s economic freefall and isolation from the West has made it increasingly eager to build its relationship with China, even at the cost of lost leverage with Beijing.

But new economic data from China shows that Russia has succeeded in capturing a larger share of the massive – and growing – Chinese oil import market. China’s imports of Russian oil skyrocketed by 36 percent in 2014. The rapid rise in Russian oil exports to China is displacing other sources, such as Saudi Arabia and other OPEC members. The Wall Street Journal reports that China’s oil imports from Saudi Arabia fell 8 percent in 2014, and imports from Venezuela fell 11 percent.

The data suggests that Russia and China are finally forging closer trade ties based on energy. They share a massive border, but have been unable to capitalize on what has long appeared to be a well-matched economic opportunity – Russia is a huge energy producer and China is the world’s largest importer of petroleum products. Historic animosity and mutual suspicion had long left a major deal off the table.

The sticking point had been price. Years of negotiations over major natural gas trade stalled as each side held out for more favorable terms. Related: Russian Gas Provides Lifeline To Chinese Expansion

However, the conflict in Ukraine and the near-severing of relations between Russia and Europe led to a breakthrough in the Sino-Russian energy relationship – in Beijing’s favor. They agreed to a major natural gas deal in May 2014 that could see Russia export 38 billion cubic meters per year to China beginning in 2018, with the option of ramping those figures up to 60 bcm per year at a later point. Crucially, the two sides appeared to agree on a price in the range of $9-$10 per million Btu (MMBtu), much closer to China’s preferred price point. The exact terms were not disclosed, but China may have even secured a lower price than Europe pays for Russian gas.

On the other hand, the collapse of oil prices have also forced down the price of liquefied natural gas (LNG), another vital source of imports for China. LNG spot prices have dipped below $10/MMBtu. While LNG prices are highly volatile and may not stay low for long, for now the Russia-China gas deal (if it goes through) looks a bit better for Russia than it did last year, having potentially locked in a price higher than it might have otherwise received after LNG prices collapsed.

Nevertheless, Russia is increasingly at China’s mercy, as it offers a crucial lifeline. Rosneft has received advanced payments from China in exchange for future oil exports, and other Russian firms have obtained loans from Chinese companies, as they are unable to access international financial markets because of western sanctions. Related: Russian Sanctions Might Be Obama’s Greatest Blunder

Moreover, not only was price a sticking point in the natural gas deal, but so was the issue over China taking equity stakes in Russian energy projects. Russia feared a geopolitical disadvantage if China acquired ownership in oil and gas fields within Russian borders.

But that too appears to be changing in China’s favor. In 2013, China’s CNPC took a 20 percent stake in the Yamal LNG project, and agreed to jointly develop oil and gas fields in eastern Siberia with Russia’s state-owned oil company Rosneft. And in November 2014, a subsidiary of CNPC gained access to a major oil field in Russia. CNPC will take a 10 percent stake in ZAO Vankorneft (a subsidiary of Rosneft), which is seeking to develop an oil field that could produce 1 million barrels per day by 2020. Such upstream equity stakes were something that Russia had opposed until recently. More upstream acquisitions by Chinese firms in Russia could be in the offing as Russia’s economic and geopolitical position has weakened.

As a result, Russia and China are forming a much stronger symbiotic relationship. Although for very different reasons, that suits both countries just fine.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Jim on January 29 2015 said:
    Except that Putin wrote about turning from West to East in his dissertation of 2006. He wrote about abandoning the dollar and boosting Russian power through fuel exports. None of this was precipitated by the West's actions in recent years, despite attempts of Western journalists to understand the outward actions.

    When NATO bombed Serbia on Orthodox Good Friday in 1998, it chilled the blood of Eastern Europe and triggered deep-seated feelings of shame and fear that go back to the Crusades. If you read their intellectuals, you will find that this Orthodox Christian reaction of East versus West is shaping Greece's move by Syriza yesterday to turn to Moscow. They also desperately want to rid themselves of the American naval base on Crete. Orthodox Christian Europe is embracing an anti-Western narrative about the clash of civilizations that is dangerously apocalyptic. Your editors would do well to air some of your commentators more carefully in light of the larger trend.
  • Bob on January 29 2015 said:
    Excellent article on a very important topic. There are those who are still trying to prove that Russia's new "all-in" policy with China had nothing to do with sanctions, completely ignoring the facts on the ground. It took more than a decade of hard negotiations between China and Russia over gas prices until sanctions were imposed and Putin rushed to China to relent on prices. The sanction deniers are still saying it would have happened in any case, despite the lack of any evidence.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News