• 5 minutes China Faces Economic Collapse
  • 8 minutes ZeroHedge: Oil And Gas Bankruptcies To Accelerate As $137 Billion Debt Matures Over Next Two Years
  • 11 minutes Trump Will Win In 2020
  • 14 minutes Oil Production Growth In U.S. Grinds To A Halt
  • 34 mins Iran says tanker oil sold at sea, buyer sets destination
  • 11 hours Hong Kong protesters appeal to Trump for support.
  • 2 hours Why Americans should be allowed guns - just not 'lunatics'
  • 9 hours Renewable Energy for Weapon Systems of the Future
  • 10 hours Oil Services Should Get Ready for a Recession, Rystad Warns
  • 17 mins End Game for Petroleum Engineering?
  • 17 hours How to get barred from visiting the Canadian Senate
  • 14 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 22 hours The Meaning Of The Iran-China Deal (and how it affects oil)
  • 21 hours Iran in the world market
  • 19 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 22 hours Senator Elizabeth Warren Promises to Rebuild Russian Economy, Grow China’s Influence and Support Maduro Regime in Venezuela
Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

U.S. To “Drown The World” In Oil

The U.S. could “drown the world in oil” over the next decade, which, according to Global Witness, would “spell disaster” for the world’s attempts to address climate change.

The U.S. is set to account for 61 percent of all new oil and gas production over the next decade. A recent report from this organization says that to avoid the worst effects of climate change, “we can’t afford to drill up any oil and gas from new fields anywhere in the world.” This, of course, would quickly cause a global deficit, as the world continues to consume around 100 million barrels per day (bpd) of oil.

Global Witness notes that the industry is not slowing down in the United States, notwithstanding recent spending cuts by independent and financially-strapped oil and gas firms. If anything, the consolidation in the Permian and other shale basins, increasingly led by the oil majors, ensures that drilling will continue at a steady pace for years to come.

It isn’t as if the rest of the world is slowing down either. The global oil industry is set to greenlight $123 billion worth of new offshore oil projects this year, nearly double the $69 billion that moved forward last year, according to Rystad Energy. In fact, while shale drilling has slowed a bit over the past year amid investor skepticism and poor financial returns, offshore projects have begun to pick up pace.

But that trend might turn out to be just a blip. The U.S. is still expected to account of the bulk of new drilling and the vast majority of new production, with much of that coming from shale. Already, the U.S. is the world’s largest producer of both oil and natural gas. And the pace has accelerated in recent years. In 2018, U.S. oil and gas production increased by 16 and 12 percent, respectively. According to the EIA, the U.S. surpassed Russia in terms of gas production in 2011, claiming the top spot, and it surpassed Saudi Arabia in oil production last year.

Going forward, new production from the U.S. will be eight times larger than the next largest source of growth, which is Canada. In fact, the U.S. will add 1.5 times more oil and gas than the rest of the world combined, according to Global Witness. Related: U.S. Is Now Largest Oil… And Gas Producer In The World

But because so much drilling in the U.S. is concentrated in a few areas, individual U.S. states on their own tower over the rest of the world. If Texas were a country, it would account for the most new oil and gas production in the world. Between 2020 and 2029, Texas could account for 28 percent of all additional output, Global Witness says.

Canada and Pennsylvania tie for second and third with 7 percent each. Then comes New Mexico at 5 percent of the growth and North Dakota at 4 percent. Oklahoma, Brazil, Colorado, Russia and Ohio are all tied at 3 percent a piece.

In other words, 7 out of the top 10 sources of new oil and gas production globally over the next decade are U.S. states.

“If things don’t change, by the end of the next decade, new oil and gas fields in the US will produce more than twice what Saudi Arabia produces today,” Global Witness said in its report.

This presents a massive challenge. “To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, our analysis shows that global oil and gas production needs to drop by 40% over the next decade. Yet, instead of declining, US oil and gas output is set to rise by 25% over this time, fueled by expansion in new fields,” the report warned.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • rudolf d'Ecofacista on August 22 2019 said:
    A new study by Wood Mackenzie, “Everything is accelerating in the Permian, including decline rates,” examines the inherent risks of this practice, compares it with actual mature Wolfcamp well results, and models the long-term supply and cash flow implications for operators and investors.

    Ryan Duman, principal analyst with Wood Mackenzie’s Lower 48 upstream team, said, “The challenges of modeling tight well estimated ultimate recoveries are growing, and accurately selecting a representative terminal decline rate is not always straightforward. It may have been historically, but using those assumptions for today’s Wolfcamp wells in the Permian may contribute to inaccurate volume assessments and valuations.”

    The study found that, after five years of production, the most active Wolfcamp subplays have annual decline rates roughly double the proxy value of 5% to 10% that is commonly used. The most common terminal decline value actually observed in mature horizontal Wolfcamp wells was 14%.

    The report analyzed the impact of the more plausible terminal decline rates and found that under a 14% terminal decline scenario, the near-term impact to total Permian supply is relatively minimal, but by 2040 nearly 800,000 bbl/day of Permian production is at risk.

    “The most significant risk associated with this error could sit with investors looking to purchase assets with a significant proportion of existing producers,” Mr Duman said. “To date, the bulk of Permian M&A (merger and acquisition) activity has targeted undeveloped tight oil acreage, but we are starting to see more developed properties transact. In the past two years alone, 16 of the largest Permian deals, totaling almost $2 billion, have involved what we classified as mid-life or late-life assets.”

    The impact of accelerated declines will be hardest felt by companies trying to grow within a constrained capital budget. As mature wells contribute less and less, more drilling is needed to maintain growth. This will affect future finding and development costs, cash flow and residual present value as the tight oil projects mature.

    Mr Duman said, “Operators with the smallest projected cash flow deficit – that is, more established players – may fare the worst in regard to present value erosion because they have more mature wells in their portfolio today and could have exhausted a larger portion of ultra-low-cost drilling locations.”

    He added, “If shale plays are classified as drilling treadmills, the Permian treadmill could actually be set on an incline.”
  • david Bennett on August 22 2019 said:
    US production has 2 choices and both lead to lower production as we head to into the next decade. 1. Currently lowering rig count (down 10% from the beginning of the year) and slowing production. 2. The Permian is driving this production increase with 500 rigs running in the area and in the next 5 years, if not sooner, all of the sweet spots will be drilled up. In addition the larger problem with the permian is the father-child drilling leading to very poor production for the cost of each additional well. Finally, Saudi is playing the long term game, knowing the issues and lower production coming with shale and allowing their market share to dwindle, for now.
  • Jay Tex on August 22 2019 said:
    I'm disappointed, Nick.

    Global Witness, the source of this article, is a propaganda arm of George Soros' Open Society. Just look at their donor report. Their funding is almost exclusively from Soros and the Omidyar Network. They also took donations from the Tides Foundation, which has numerous links to actual convicted terrorists.
  • Lee James on August 26 2019 said:
    “If things don’t change, by the end of the next decade, new oil and gas fields in the US will produce more than twice what Saudi Arabia produces today,” Global Witness said.

    Not sure the assumption of "no change" works, as per other posted comments.

    In the grand scheme of things, burning fossil fuel is barely a blimp in our planet's history. Burning what came out of shale formations might be missed altogether.

    Perspective is everything when it comes to using and appreciating precious resources.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play