• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 7 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 5 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 1 min The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 9 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 3 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 11 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 5 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 5 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 4 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 2 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 12 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 12 hours Superhumans
  • 1 hour Nopec Sherman act legislation
Alt Text

New Breakthrough Could Slash Solar Prices To New Lows

Scientists believe they’ve found a…

Alt Text

The Overlooked Giant In Renewables

The IEA expects renewable energy…

Alt Text

IEA: Renewables Set For Explosive Growth

The IEA sees strong growth…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Trending Discussions

Amazon, Twitter Fail Greenpeace Report Card

Amazon, Twitter Fail Greenpeace Report Card

Amazon and Twitter have received “Fs” on their renewable energy report cards issued by Greenpeace, for inadequate commitment to renewable energy as a large percentage of Internet traffic remains powered by dirty energy.

According to a Greenpeace report released on Wednesday, only 15% of Amazon’s massive Internet traffic is powered by green energy, while Twitter, which doesn’t use energy hungry data centers, has a long way to go in making its micro-blogging service more efficient and energy transparent.

Apple Inc., Google Inc. and Facebook Inc. caught the flip side of the report, with Greenpeace noting that these companies had made significant progress in adopting renewable energy sources to power their web services.     

Apple was given an “A” for efforts in transparency, renewable energy policy and renewable energy deployment, up from Ds and Fs from the last report two years ago.  The improved grading represents Apple’s construction of an on-site solar panel farm and fuel-cells at its North Carolina data center, as well as the direct procurement of renewable energy sources at its other three facilities.  

Amazon—which accounts for 1% of all Internet traffic--scored an “F” in terms of commitment to renewable energy, where it locates its data centers and environmental advocacy, while the company was given a “D” in energy efficiency.

Greenpeace noted that unlike Apple, Google and Facebook, Amazon was not “motivated” and indeed was working backwards, citing the example of its Umatilla Electric Cooperative in Oregon, which is pushing the state to loosen environmental restrictions.

“We haven’t seen a change in Amazon,” Cook said in a statement. “Unfortunately, unlike many of those in the sector, they’ve not moved very much in the past few years.”

Some internet companies "have refused to pay even lip service to sustainability and are simply buying dirty energy straight from the grid," said the report. "Those companies, most notably Amazon Web Services, are choosing how to power their infrastructure based solely on lowest electricity prices."

In a statement emailed to various news agencies, Amazon the Greenpeace report “misses the mark by using false assumptions”, and that the company operates “efficient and highly utilized data centers” in 10 AWS regions across the globe, and two of those use 100 percent carbon-free power.”

Greenpeace said Twitter is lagging behind salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Box, which have demonstrated their commitment to renewable energy. Twitter was given an “F” for transparency, energy efficiency mitigation, and renewable energy deployment and advocacy and a “D” for renewable energy commitment and sitting policy.

“Twitter’s lack of transparency makes it impossible to know what, if any, notable efficiency measures the company employs,” according to Greenpeace.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • dan on April 04 2014 said:
    Green peace should be labeled what they are. An environmental terrorist organization. They should be outlawed in every nation of the world.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News