• 3 minutes Natural gas is crushing wind and solar power
  • 6 minutes OPEC and Russia could discuss emergency cuts
  • 8 minutes Is Pete Buttigieg emerging as the most likely challenger to Trump?
  • 11 minutes Question: Why are oil futures so low through 2020?
  • 13 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 2 hours So the west is winning, is it? Only if you’re a delusional Trump toady, Mr Pompeo, by Simon Tisdall
  • 2 hours Fight with American ignorance, Part 1: US is a Republic, it is not a Democracy
  • 3 hours Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 3 hours "Criticism of migration will become a criminal offense.  And media outlets that give room to criticism of migration, can be shut down." - EU Official to the Media.
  • 3 hours CDC covid19 coverup?
  • 3 hours Peak Shale Will Send Oil Prices Sky High
  • 18 hours “The era of cheap & abundant energy is long gone. Money supply & debt have grown faster than real economy. Debt saturation is now a real risk, requiring a global scale reset.”"We are now in new era of expensive unconventional energy
  • 21 hours Blowout videos
  • 4 hours Democrats Plan "B" Bloomberg Implodes. Plan "C" = John Kerry ?
  • 18 hours Who decides the Oil costs?
  • 1 day The Arithmetic Of Fracking
Alt Text

Could This Be The Decade Of Green Hydrogen?

Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies…

Alt Text

The Next Renewable Energy Source Could Be Rain

The search for next great…

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Amazon, Twitter Fail Greenpeace Report Card

Amazon and Twitter have received “Fs” on their renewable energy report cards issued by Greenpeace, for inadequate commitment to renewable energy as a large percentage of Internet traffic remains powered by dirty energy.

According to a Greenpeace report released on Wednesday, only 15% of Amazon’s massive Internet traffic is powered by green energy, while Twitter, which doesn’t use energy hungry data centers, has a long way to go in making its micro-blogging service more efficient and energy transparent.

Apple Inc., Google Inc. and Facebook Inc. caught the flip side of the report, with Greenpeace noting that these companies had made significant progress in adopting renewable energy sources to power their web services.     

Apple was given an “A” for efforts in transparency, renewable energy policy and renewable energy deployment, up from Ds and Fs from the last report two years ago.  The improved grading represents Apple’s construction of an on-site solar panel farm and fuel-cells at its North Carolina data center, as well as the direct procurement of renewable energy sources at its other three facilities.  

Amazon—which accounts for 1% of all Internet traffic--scored an “F” in terms of commitment to renewable energy, where it locates its data centers and environmental advocacy, while the company was given a “D” in energy efficiency.

Greenpeace noted that unlike Apple, Google and Facebook, Amazon was not “motivated” and indeed was working backwards, citing the example of its Umatilla Electric Cooperative in Oregon, which is pushing the state to loosen environmental restrictions.

“We haven’t seen a change in Amazon,” Cook said in a statement. “Unfortunately, unlike many of those in the sector, they’ve not moved very much in the past few years.”

Some internet companies "have refused to pay even lip service to sustainability and are simply buying dirty energy straight from the grid," said the report. "Those companies, most notably Amazon Web Services, are choosing how to power their infrastructure based solely on lowest electricity prices."

In a statement emailed to various news agencies, Amazon the Greenpeace report “misses the mark by using false assumptions”, and that the company operates “efficient and highly utilized data centers” in 10 AWS regions across the globe, and two of those use 100 percent carbon-free power.”

Greenpeace said Twitter is lagging behind salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Box, which have demonstrated their commitment to renewable energy. Twitter was given an “F” for transparency, energy efficiency mitigation, and renewable energy deployment and advocacy and a “D” for renewable energy commitment and sitting policy.

“Twitter’s lack of transparency makes it impossible to know what, if any, notable efficiency measures the company employs,” according to Greenpeace.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage




Leave a comment
  • dan on April 04 2014 said:
    Green peace should be labeled what they are. An environmental terrorist organization. They should be outlawed in every nation of the world.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News