• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 3 hours The power of propaganda has no boundaries: Which country has larger territory US od China
  • 3 hours Freedom of Speech for Dummies
  • 45 mins Boring! See Ya Clowns, And Have Fun In Germany
  • 8 hours Iranian Oil Tanker struck by missiles off Jeddah
  • 4 hours Crazy Stories From Round The World
  • 5 hours South Korea Unveils Fighter Jet Mock-Up Amid Program Challenges
  • 20 hours Support Held. Back in UGAZ
  • 8 hours Any difference btw Hunter Biden on BOD of Ukraine Company vs. Qatar bailout of Kushner Real Estate 666 Fifth Ave ?
  • 3 hours How The US Quietly Lost The 1st Amendment
  • 7 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 1 day ISIS Prisoners Escape Syria Camp After Turkish Shelling. Woohoo!
  • 1 day 5 Tweets That Change The World?
  • 1 day China's Blueprint For Global Power

Breaking News:

Can Tesla Survive Without Tax Credits?

Charles Kennedy

Charles Kennedy

Charles is a writer for Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

Amazon, Twitter Fail Greenpeace Report Card

Amazon and Twitter have received “Fs” on their renewable energy report cards issued by Greenpeace, for inadequate commitment to renewable energy as a large percentage of Internet traffic remains powered by dirty energy.

According to a Greenpeace report released on Wednesday, only 15% of Amazon’s massive Internet traffic is powered by green energy, while Twitter, which doesn’t use energy hungry data centers, has a long way to go in making its micro-blogging service more efficient and energy transparent.

Apple Inc., Google Inc. and Facebook Inc. caught the flip side of the report, with Greenpeace noting that these companies had made significant progress in adopting renewable energy sources to power their web services.     

Apple was given an “A” for efforts in transparency, renewable energy policy and renewable energy deployment, up from Ds and Fs from the last report two years ago.  The improved grading represents Apple’s construction of an on-site solar panel farm and fuel-cells at its North Carolina data center, as well as the direct procurement of renewable energy sources at its other three facilities.  

Amazon—which accounts for 1% of all Internet traffic--scored an “F” in terms of commitment to renewable energy, where it locates its data centers and environmental advocacy, while the company was given a “D” in energy efficiency.

Greenpeace noted that unlike Apple, Google and Facebook, Amazon was not “motivated” and indeed was working backwards, citing the example of its Umatilla Electric Cooperative in Oregon, which is pushing the state to loosen environmental restrictions.

“We haven’t seen a change in Amazon,” Cook said in a statement. “Unfortunately, unlike many of those in the sector, they’ve not moved very much in the past few years.”

Some internet companies "have refused to pay even lip service to sustainability and are simply buying dirty energy straight from the grid," said the report. "Those companies, most notably Amazon Web Services, are choosing how to power their infrastructure based solely on lowest electricity prices."

In a statement emailed to various news agencies, Amazon the Greenpeace report “misses the mark by using false assumptions”, and that the company operates “efficient and highly utilized data centers” in 10 AWS regions across the globe, and two of those use 100 percent carbon-free power.”

Greenpeace said Twitter is lagging behind salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE:CRM) and Box, which have demonstrated their commitment to renewable energy. Twitter was given an “F” for transparency, energy efficiency mitigation, and renewable energy deployment and advocacy and a “D” for renewable energy commitment and sitting policy.

“Twitter’s lack of transparency makes it impossible to know what, if any, notable efficiency measures the company employs,” according to Greenpeace.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • dan on April 04 2014 said:
    Green peace should be labeled what they are. An environmental terrorist organization. They should be outlawed in every nation of the world.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play