• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 1 hour Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 17 hours US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 2 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 3 hours U.S. Shale Oil Debt: Deep the Denial
  • 3 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 19 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 3 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 1 day Petrol versus EV
  • 14 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 17 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 5 hours 47 Oil & Gas Projects Expected to Start in SE Asia between 2018 & 2025
  • 20 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 21 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
Alt Text

Uzbekistan, Russia Announce Joint Nuclear Facility

Uzbekistan and Russia have struck…

Alt Text

Is Infinite Clean Energy Near?

The dream of creating a…

Alt Text

The Boy Genius Tackling Energy’s Toughest Problem

This 23-year old nuclear physicist…

Colin Chilcoat

Colin Chilcoat

Colin Chilcoat is a specialist in Eurasian energy affairs and political institutions currently living and working in Chicago. A complete collection of his work can…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Does Russia Really Own 20% Of The US’ Uranium Reserves?

Does Russia Really Own 20% Of The US’ Uranium Reserves?

Yes, well, sort of – and they have for some time now. It’s relatively old news, but a recent Times report and an upcoming book from the Hoover Institute’s Peter Schweizer have refocused attention on a 2008 blockbuster uranium deal involving Russia, the United States, and a Canadian company Uranium One. Pushing connections and presidential candidacies aside – the Clintons’ complicity is still very much speculation at this point – lets return to the deal and take a look at the US nuclear industry and, globally, the rise of Rosatom.

The saga begins in 2009 when, after roughly a year of negotiations, Russian state nuclear corporation Rosatom, acting though its subsidiary and Mining Division platform ARMZ, purchased a nearly 20 percent stake in Toronto-based Uranium One. The following year, ARMZ increased its stake to more than 51 percent – a deal that required Kazakh and Canadian regulatory approvals in addition to clearance by the US Committee on Foreign Investment. In 2013, ARMZ paid roughly $2.8 billion for the remaining 48 percent and full control of Uranium One. Finally, in that same year, Rosatom assumed direct ownership of the company, reorganizing it under Uranium One Holding (U1H) and delisting it from the Toronto stock exchange. Related: Russia To Power Arctic Drilling With Floating Nuclear Reactors

Among U1H’s assets are a handful of US projects and exploration tracts. The most advanced among them are Jab and Antelope, Moore Ranch, and Willow Creek – all of which are in Wyoming, developed under the auspices of Uranium One USA and Uranium One Americas. The Willow Creek project is their only currently active operation.

So, to further answer the lead question: Russia, via Rosatom and U1H, owns roughly 20 percent of US uranium production capacity. The share of US reserves is much less clear as economic constraints significantly muddy the picture. Looking at actual production, U1H, via Willow Creek, produced an estimated 210 tons of uranium, or 11 percent of the 1887.5 tons extracted in the US in 2014.

Still, it’s somewhat disingenuous to say this uranium is now Russia’s, to do with what it pleases, or to suggest that any amount of the uranium will end up in Iran. The current licenses – held by the US-based subsidiaries and approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission – do not allow exports from any U1H US facility. Related: Health Risks From Fukushima Disaster Greatly Exaggerated

The truth is, the US uranium industry as its currently built isn’t all that American. In fact, it’s mostly Canadian. Qualms over perceived threats to national security are misplaced, though not entirely dismissible. The deal further illustrates an already pronounced trend of the decline of US nuclear capabilities and influence at all stages of the nuclear fuel cycle.

Post-Fukushima – and post-shale gas revolution – US nuclear employment has fallen more than 34 percent and exploration and development drilling is down over 80 percent. Relatively low-grade uranium and low global prices stunt the value of US mines in the short- to medium-term. Further out, stricter regulation and a heavier reliance on the private sector, limit the industry’s potential abroad relative to its competitors. Related: Tesla Could Be Changing The Dynamics Of Global Energy

Perhaps more importantly, the deal speaks to Rosatom’s aggressive new growth. Already the world’s most comprehensive nuclear services vendor, Rosatom is now one of the top three producers of uranium by volume worldwide. For the most part, the prize was Kazakhstan and not the United States, which is a symbolic victory at best. U1H’s Kazakh production now accounts for approximately 56 percent of Rosatom’s total production, both domestic and abroad. At 4,269 tons it’s also more than 20 percent of Kazakhstan’s total uranium production.

Rosatom’s downstream movements are just as well-defined. The company’s overseas order portfolio was up 9 percent to $73 billion in 2013, after 23 percent growth in 2012. Long a fixture in developing markets, Rosatom is turning its capable sights to the western world.

By Colin Chilcoat of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x


Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • SteveK9 on May 07 2015 said:
    Thanks for some sense.
  • Imfletcer on May 08 2015 said:
    We don't need a "smoking gun" to know the Clintons are into dirty business. For anyone else in the world we would naturally and logically presume influence with tens of millions of dollars passing to a potential influence peddler - especially where transparency was promised and coincidentally missing, where both Bill and the foundation lied about critical meetings at the Clinton household underlying the deal (to the NY Times no less), and where Hillary's puppets keep beating the drum claiming "no evidence" in light of an abundance of documented evidence. We convict people of bribery and other serious felonies upon less evidence. It's time to hold elected officials (from all parties) accountable. Don't ignore the evidence just because there is no "smoking gun", the Clintons are far too accomplished at their deceit to leave one of those laying around.
  • DJWN on October 25 2017 said:
    Your article isn't telling the whole truth. They actually HAVE exported some of the Uranium and they did it without licenses. IT'S A FACT, albeit in inconvenient fact for the liberal agenda. Sorry.
  • Brian lee on October 31 2017 said:
    Why would Russia want our uraniumn whe they produce twice as much as we do?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News