WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Is Canadian Oil Actually Subsidized?

Is Canadian Oil Actually Subsidized?

Ending fossil fuel subsidies was…

These Refiners Could See Some Healthy Returns

These Refiners Could See Some Healthy Returns

While the rebalancing of U.S.…

US Towns Sued for Illegal Fracking Bans

Fracking has allowed the US to massively boost its oil and gas production, yet whilst the technology has arguably saved the country’s economy, it has also divided the nation, between those who support the controversial drilling technique and those that oppose it.

Several towns and cities around the US have voted to ban all fracking practices within their jurisdiction, and now the oil companies, angry at being denied access to buried shale reserves, have begun to file cases against these cities. This is beginning to raise the question as to whether or not local governments have the power to introduce laws that ban fracking.

This week, the Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA) filed a lawsuit against two Colorado towns, Lafayette and Fort Collins, after both passed legislation to forbid the practice of fracking.

Related article: Frack-Water Recycling, an Emerging Market

Laurie Kadrich, a city official from Fort Collins, told Bloomberg that “as a city, we have a responsibility to defend the voter-approved ordinance, so we’ll be looking into the contents of the lawsuit and we’ll respond appropriately.”

Fracking Ban

The COGA have stated that the Colorado Supreme Court has interpreted the state law in such a way that forbids any local bans on fracking. Tisha Schuller, the president of the COGA, said “that COGA has had to take this action further demonstrates the huge disservice self-described ‘fractivists’ have done to our communities in promoting energy bans.

Instead of working constructively with industry and city leaders, extremists have used fear and misinformation to lure cities into passing bans which they know are illegal and will cost staff time and taxpayer money.

If there was any other way to deal with the blatant illegality of these bans, our members would certainly pursue it.”

Related article: Trans-Adriatic Pipeline Takes Step Forward

Gary Wockner, the director of Colorado Clean Water Action, told Al Jazeera that “we think they’re trying to overturn democracy. The will of the voters is clear. They do not want to be fracked.

This industry spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to buy the election, and they were not successful. Now they’re trying a last ditch effort.”

Cities in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York are also facing similar lawsuits.

By. Joao Peixe of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • rf on December 09 2013 said:
    please n o w lets be r e a l ; "allegedly illegal"

    one greedy 1%er's illegality (fracking) is another's clean aire food and water reason to be... (inalienable right)

    structured extremes aka fed corp government + oil in bound support of fracking v. eccentrically, structured assertiveness aka local government being assertively structured for all, at the exclusion of the 1% ala eccentricity in 2013)
  • William on December 09 2013 said:
    I suppose you had a team of law professionals research the law books and decided that the bans are "illegal." Or are you promoting an industry-slanted, pro-water table contamination (for millenia) opinion?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News