While Ecuador’s split from the…
U.S. economic sanctions against Venezuela…
University of California at Berkeley chemists have developed an innovative new storage material for methane that could lessen the complexity of filling up with natural gas, and extend the range of such vehicles. The material is a flexible metal organic framework that expands when methane is pumped in.
The UC Berkeley chemists and colleagues at the National Institute of Standards and Technology and in Europe findings have been published in the journal Nature.
Increasing numbers of natural gas-powered trucks and buses are hitting the road, but a major disadvantage is the bulky equipment needed to store compressed natural gas (CNG) or to keep liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold. The team’s new and innovative way to store methane could speed the development of natural gas-powered cars that don’t require the high pressures or cold temperatures of today’s compressed or liquefied natural gas vehicles.
Natural gas is cleaner-burning than gasoline, and today there are more than 150,000 CNG vehicles on the road in the U.S., most of them trucks and buses. But until manufacturers can find a way to pack more methane into a tank at lower pressures and temperatures, allowing for a greater driving range and less complication at the pump, passenger cars are unlikely to adopt natural gas as a fuel.
The UC Berkeley chemists have developed a porous and flexible material – a so-called metal-organic framework (MOF) – for storing methane that addresses these problems. The flexible MOF collapses when the methane is extracted to run the engine, but expands when the methane is pumped in at only moderate pressure, within the range produced by a home level compressor.
Related: Is This The Most Bearish Oil CEO Statement Yet?
Jeffrey Long, a UC Berkeley professor of chemistry who led the project said, “You could potentially fill up at home.”
The flexible MOF can be loaded with methane, the main ingredient of natural gas, at 35 to 65 times atmospheric pressure (500-900 psi), while CNG vehicles compress natural gas into an empty tank under 250 atmospheres (3,600 psi).
LNG vehicles operate at lower pressures but require significant insulation in the tank system and equipment to maintain the natural gas at minus 162º C (-260º F) so that it remains liquid.
Long said that next-generation natural gas vehicles will require a material that binds the methane and packs it more densely into the fuel tank, providing a larger driving range. One of the major problems has been finding a material that adsorbs the methane at a relatively low pressure, such as 35 atmospheres, but gives it all up at a pressure where the engine can operate, between 5 and 6 atmospheres. MOFs, which have a lot of internal surface area to adsorb gases and store them at high density, are one of the most promising materials for adsorbed natural gas (ANG) storage.
Long pointed out, “This is a big advance both in terms of capacity and thermal management. With these new flexible MOFs, you can get to capacities beyond what was thought possible with rigid MOFs.”
Related: These Private Equity Giants Are Selling Their Shale... To China
Long explained that among the other advantages of flexible MOFs is that they do not heat up as much as other methane absorbers, so there is less cooling of the fuel required. “If you fill a tank that has adsorbent, such as activated charcoal, when the methane binds it releases heat. With our material, some of that heat goes into changing the structure of the material, so you have less heat to dissipate, less heat to manage. You don’t have to have as much cooling technology associated with filling your tank,” he said.
The flexible MOF material could perhaps even be placed inside a balloon-like bag that stretches to accommodate the expanding MOF as methane is pumped in, so that some of the heat given off goes into stretching the bag.
Natural gas is one of the cheapest and cleanest fossil fuels today, used widely to heat homes as well as in manufacturing and to produce electricity. It has yet to be widely adopted in the transportation sector, however, because of the expensive and large on-board compressed fuel tanks. In addition, gasoline packs over three times the energy density per volume as natural gas, even when compressed to 3,600 psi, which results in natural gas vehicles with a shorter driving range per fill-up.
To advance on-board natural gas storage, Ford Motor Company teamed up with UC Berkeley on this project, with funding from the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) of the U.S. Department of Energy. Ford is a leader in CNG/propane-prepped vehicles with more than 57,000 sold in the U.S. since 2009, more than all other major U.S. automakers combined.
According to Mike Veenstra, of Ford’s research and advanced engineering group in Dearborn, Michigan, Ford recognized that ANG has the potential to lower the cost of on-board tanks, station compressors and fuel along with serving to increase natural gas-powered vehicle driving range within the limited cargo space.
Related: Policy, Coincidence Or Conspiracy: What’s Really Holding Oil Prices Down?
Veenstra, who is also the principal investigator of this ARPA-E project, explained, “Natural gas storage in porous materials provides the key advantage of being able to store significant amounts of natural gas at low pressures than compressed gas at the same conditions. The advantage of low pressure is the benefit it provides both on-board the vehicle and off-board at the station. In addition, the low-pressure application facilitates novel concepts such as tanks with reduced wall thickness along with conformable concepts which aid in decreasing the need to achieve the equivalent volumetric capacity of compressed CNG at high pressure.”
Long has been exploring MOFs as gas absorbers for a decade, hoping to use them to capture carbon dioxide emitted from power plants or store hydrogen in hydrogen-fueled vehicles, or to catalyze gas reactions for industry. Last year, however, a study by UC Berkeley’s Berend Smit found that rigid MOFs have a limited capacity to store methane. Long and graduate student and first author Jarad Mason instead turned to flexible MOFs, noting that they behave better when methane is pumped in and out.
The flexible MOFs they tested are based on cobalt and iron atoms dispersed throughout the structure, with links of benzenedipyrazolate (bdp). Both cobalt (bdp) and iron (bdp) are highly porous when expanded, but shrink to essentially no pores when collapsed.
Their first experiments on these compounds already surpass the theoretical limits for rigid MOFs, Long said. “This is a fundamental discovery that now needs a lot of engineering to find out how best to take advantage of these new adsorbent properties.”
Long and his colleagues are also now developing flexible MOFs to store hydrogen. That leaves the engineering to others.
Let’s hope someone takes up the challenge.
By Brian Westenhaus
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
Brian is the editor of the popular energy technology site New Energy and Fuel. The site’s mission is to inform, stimulate, amuse and abuse the…