WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Global Energy Advisory September 23rd 2016

Global Energy Advisory September 23rd 2016

While the Iraq oil industry…

U.S. Rig Count Rises To 7 Month High

U.S. Rig Count Rises To 7 Month High

The U.S. rig count continues…

Putin Leaves G-20 Meeting Early After Bitterly Chilly Reception

Russia may be getting used to early withdrawals in the news they see.

In September and October it saw three major Western oil companies suspend operations with Russian partners to comply with Western sanctions imposed on Moscow’s oil industry. Now their president, Vladimir Putin, left the summit Group of 20 (G-20) of the world’s major economies in Brisbane, Australia, on Nov. 16 even before the leaders issued their final communiqué.

The Russian leader, who had arrived in Australia from a business trip to China, said he needed to rest before resuming his routine presidential duties in Moscow the following day. But his reception by his counterparts gathered in Brisbane may have been the real reason for his early departure. And it’s all about Russia’s embattled neighbor, Ukraine.

The European Union and the United States have imposed sanctions on Russia and its oil industry because of its annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula in March, its suspected involvement in the fighting between pro-Russian separatists fighting Ukrainian forces, and the downing of a Malaysian jetliner carrying European and Australian passengers by a missile of suspected Russian origin.

Moscow began to feel their impact in late September when the three Western oil companies – Exxon Mobil of the United States, Total of France and the Anglo-Dutch Royal Dutch Shell – said the sanctions left them with no choice but to end joint ventures with Russian oil companies.

During the Brisbane meeting, several Western leaders warned of more sanctions in response to the assertion by NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg that Russia had sent combat troops into Ukraine.

British Prime Minister David Cameron said, “If [Putin] continues to destabilize Ukraine, there will be further sanctions, further measures.”

President Obama, in Brisbane, reiterated that threat to Putin in “businesslike and blunt” terms when both were in Beijing last week, and said the NATO allegation, if confirmed, could be seen as an invasion. He said he was “very firm [with Putin] on the need to uphold core international principles, and one of those principles is you don’t invade other countries.”

Putin maintained his denial of any Russian involvement in the Ukraine conflict. In fact, he said, “[T]he situation [in Ukraine] in my view has good chances for resolution, no matter how strange it may sound.” He didn’t elaborate.

Whether Putin left the summit early to avoid further criticism from his counterparts or simply to catch up on sleep, it’s clear that the Western sanctions have hurt his country. The measures, aimed not only at Russia’s oil sector but also at its banks, are putting pressure on the country’s economy at a time when Russia’s currency, the ruble, is weakening because of rapidly falling oil prices.

Obama said the US and the EU are ready to increase that pressure if necessary. “At this point the sanctions we have in place are biting plenty good,” he said after the summit had ended. “We retain the capability, and we have our teams constantly looking at mechanisms in which to turn up additional pressure as necessary.”

By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • P.R. on November 18 2014 said:
    Do you have any proof of what you say about Russia?
  • Alex on November 18 2014 said:
    I wonder if author has the proofs Russia was behind
    the MH017 accident?! I guess he does not! The international investigation did not finish et!

    For sure NATO and Pentagon have the exact dates who did shoot the Boeing-777 ( do not forget two NATO's AVACS planes were checking all the dates at the time of the accident!). If it was Russia, all the dates would be published immediately! But it did not happen!

    There are dates it was Ukrainian military jet, not BUK-1 missile!

    So the author uses the false writting the article. It is not good!
  • Allan Dias on November 17 2014 said:
    So we need to uphold core international principles, and one of those principles is you don’t invade other countries. Really. Except if you are the U.S.A and those principles, which apply to the rest of the world, don't apply to you.

    I used to be very pro-US earlier; no longer...
  • Lee James on November 17 2014 said:
    Many Russians love Putin because he is restoring past glory and has at his command native resources (oil) that make him The Man. We can understand Putin when he claims past history with the eastern Ukraine and that many Russian speakers live there. Where I leave off is Putin's unflinching deception and misrepresentations.

    Russia's one-horse economy (oil) and its national defense industry, including hackers, is about all there is to today's Russia. Russia can do better, and hopefully the West can acquire a "cleaner" energy, devoid of the kind of dirt coming out of Russia today.

    Sorry for these strong words. But like some world leaders, I too feel they are in order.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News