• 25 mins Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 1 hour VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 2 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 3 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 4 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 20 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 22 hours Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 24 hours Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 1 day EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 1 day Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 4 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
  • 7 days Record U.S. Crude Exports Squeeze North Sea Oil
  • 7 days Iraq Aims To Reopen Kirkuk-Turkey Oil Pipeline Bypassing Kurdistan
  • 7 days Supply Crunch To Lead To Oil Price Spike By 2020s, Expert Says
  • 7 days Saudi Arabia Ups November Oil Exports To 7-Million Bpd
Canada’s Pipeline Industry Takes Another Hit

Canada’s Pipeline Industry Takes Another Hit

Canada’s struggling oil industry has…

The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

Often described as the backbone…

Is This The Best Answer Yet To The Energy Storage Question?

Every so often an item appears in Blowout Week that’s worthy of further discussion, and Blowout Week 118 has one. It’s the article on ARES – Advanced Rail Energy Storage – a simple combination of three proven technologies – railroads, potential energy release and regenerative braking – which reportedly has a number of advantages over its numerous energy storage competitors:

• All it needs is a rail line, heavy rail cars with regenerative braking, and a hill. It needs no reservoirs, pump houses, penstocks, underground cavities, salt mines, submarine bladders or even water.

• Environmental impacts are usually minimal, energy efficiency, costs and ramp rates are reportedly comparable to pumped hydro, there are no limits on the number of charge/discharge cycles and no degradation with time.

• There’s no lack of ARES natural resources (hills) in many parts of the world. Storage capacity can be made as large or as small as needed in these areas.

The ARES concept has been tested at a pilot project in Tehachapi, California. No results are provided but some intriguing images are:

(Click to enlarge)

Related: Is A Permanent Decline Coming For Russia?

The ARES gravity train used at the Tehachapi, California, pilot plant

So let’s take a closer look at ARES:

First, sources of data. As is common with “first posts” I have used a number of basic data sources that tend to be repetitive, and rather than burden the text with lots of duplicate references I am listing all these sources below:

ARES Press Kit

Pahrump Rail Energy Storage Project

America’s First Commercial-Scale Rail Project Receives Approval

Advanced Rail Energy Storage uses heavy train cars to store power

Gravity train as energy storage

ARES system to put energy storage on the right track

ARES performance

Plus a potted overview from Utility Week:

Technologies vying for the bulk storage market

Now on with the show. The Blowout Week article describes how Advanced Rail Energy Storage LLC has just been granted a right-of-way lease by the US Bureau of Land Management for a 50MW rail storage project in Pahrump, Nevada. The approval came after an Environmental Assessment concluded that the project would have no significant impact (it disturbs only about 70 hectares). Details of the project are summarized on the list below and on the following project layout map:

1. A single 9.2 km long track with an elevation change of approximately 640m.

2. Six 300-ton trains made up of rail cars with regenerative braking capability.

3. 50MW peak output, 12.5MWh storage with the option of scaling up to 1 GW.

4. Capital cost $55 million ($1,100/kW installed. I can find no information on costs/KWh.)

5. “A lower life-cycle cost than batteries, a higher energy-to-power ratio than flywheels, and a greater efficiency and faster ramp-rate than pumped-storage.”

6. An 8-month construction time, project life 30-40 years.

7. “The project has all private financing, no government loans or grants.”

(Click to enlarge)

ARES Pahrump project layout map

The project will be grid-connected and designed to provide “fast response energy to assist the balancing of intermittent renewable energy [solar and wind]” and handle “momentary changes in demand”, which probably explains why the storage lasts for only 15 minutes at 50MW output. Long-term storage could, however, presumably be achieved simply by parking trains at the top of the hill and leaving them there.

Related: ExxonMobil’s Secret Weapon Against Low Oil Prices

And here’s what I understand to be an artist’s impression of what the rail yards for a 1GW system would look like:

A 1GWh(?) ARES facility

An entertaining video of how the rail cars are shunted around to compensate for changes in PV output as clouds pass over the panels is also available here. I can’t post a direct link to the video but it’s the image at the bottom. There are more images of interest above it.

Other technical features of the ARES system include:

Reactive Power Production – The shuttle-trains onboard Dual 3-Level Active Rectifier/Invertors are capable of supplying 25 percent of generated system power as reactive power for grid VAR support in full discharge mode and in excess of 100 percent of system power as reactive power while synchronized to the grid in standby.

Heavy Inertia – When in direct grid synchronization the ARES shuttle-trains provide beneficial heavy inertia — augmenting grid stability against the loss of heavy generating facilities and increasing reliance on solar energy.

High Efficiency Regulation – While providing Regulation-Up and Regulation-Down support to the ISO a separate dedicated pool of loaded ARES shuttle-trains are available to dispatch from mid-system elevation complying with ISO regulation commands without having to overcome the efficiency loss of operating on pre-stored energy. As such an ARES facility is able perform a round-trip regulation Reg-Up/Reg-Down command at over an 86 percent operating efficiency.

Variable Output at Constant Efficiency – Unlike CAES and pumped-storage hydro there is no loss of system pressure during discharge. ARES system efficiency is constant over the full range of discharge and power output.

It’s nice to know that ARES considered and apparently resolved its grid stability issues before starting construction, which is more than can be said for another project Energy Matters has been discussing recently.

And the System Ratings image below reportedly demonstrates the superiority of ARES over all other energy storage technologies except pumped hydro:

ARES system rating versus other energy storage system ratings.

But ARES has a major advantage over pumped hydro too. Pumped hydro needs favorable topography and water, an increasingly rare combination, while ARES needs only favorable topography. And while there isn’t much favorable topography in such places as Florida, the Netherlands and the Nullarbor Plain, it abounds in the southwestern U.S. Consider for example the Google Earth view below, which shows the 70km by 3o km “prospective area” surrounding the ARES Pahrump project on the west side of the Spring Mountains:

Pahrump “pediment”, showing area prospective for ARES installations

Related: Oil Edges Up After Biggest Draw In U.S. Crude Stocks This Year

This 70 x 30km area covers an area of roughly 2,000 square kilometers where the land drops regularly at gradients of 5-10 percent over distances of up to 30km as we move away from the edge of the mountains, forming what we U.S. desert geologists call a “pediment”. I’m now going to guess that half of this area, or 1,000 sq km, could accommodate ARES storage projects. How much ARES storage could be developed on 1,000 sq km? We can make the following rough calculations:

- One 12.5MWh ARES system takes up 70 hectares
- 1,000 sq km (100,000 hectares) will therefore accommodate 100,000/70 = 1,400 systems
- Total potential storage therefore amounts to 1,400 * 12.5 MWh = 17,500 MWh, or 17.5 GWh

Now we are getting somewhere. 17.5 GWh represents approximately two Dinorwigs, and with ARES we get these two Dinorwigs from a patch of waterless desert that makes up only a tiny fraction of the total prospective ARES area in the American southwest. Potential for the development of ARES storage in the numerous surrounding “pediment” areas is clearly unlimited.

There’s just one problem – cost.

1,400 ARES systems at $55 million each will cost seventy seven billion dollars.

Okay, we can maybe take a half or maybe even a third of this number to allow for economics of scale and incremental technological improvements with time (there won’t be any major breakthroughs with technologies this mature). But we’re still looking at roughly $25 billion, which seems like a prohibitive amount to spend for enough storage to supply Nevada’s demand for only four or five days.

Although ARES might always get lucky at the tables. The city in the bottom right quadrant of the last image is Las Vegas, after all.

By Roger Andrews via Euanmearns.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • David Hrivnak on April 11 2016 said:
    Very cool idea and relatively low tech.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News