• 1 hour Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 2 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 20 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 21 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 21 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 22 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 23 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 23 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 1 day Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 1 day Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 1 day OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 7 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 8 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
Is OPEC Considering Deeper Output Cuts?

Is OPEC Considering Deeper Output Cuts?

You could argue OPEC and…

The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

The Safest Way To Bet On The Bitcoin Boom

Often described as the backbone…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Iran Announces Plans to Build First Nuclear Submarine

Iran has announced plans to start building its first ever nuclear submarine, a piece of advanced military technology that only the most powerful nations on earth are even able to construct; the interesting bit is that nuclear submarines just happen to run on uranium enriched to such a level that it can also double as the fuel source for a nuclear bomb.

Olli Heinonen, the former UN chief nuclear inspector, said that “such submarines often use HEU (highly enriched uranium),” yet due to the situation regarding Iran’s nuclear program, foreign nations will be reluctant to supply them with the HEU needed. Iran will then be able to “cite the lack of foreign fuel suppliers as further justification for continuing on its uranium enrichment path.”

Any step that Iran takes along this path will certainly increase global suspicions and destroy any progress made during the negotiations which have been taking place with the UN. It could even lead closer to a military confrontation which would devastate the global oil market.

Many experts, such as Mark Fitzpatrick, director of the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London, doubt Iran’s capability to build a nuclear submarine. Fitzpatrick flatly stated that “there is no way that Iran could build a nuclear-powered submarine.”

This leads them to agree with Shashank Joshi, a Middle East specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, when he claims that “Iran is using this submarine announcement to create bargaining leverage. It can negotiate away these 'plans' for concessions, or use the plans as a useful pretext for its enrichment activity.”

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Joe Varcadipane on July 15 2012 said:
    The issue is proliferation. Iran has funded, trained and supplied some of the most heinous organizations of the past half century. It may be easy to point the finger at Israel, but I don't recall Israel supplying or training insurgent groups in the art of killing American or coalition forces. When Iran stops funding, training, and supplying these organizations of mass destruction, then yes, they by all means should have the access to all the nuclear technology available. But seeing as they cannot be trusted with mortar shells and ball berrings, what makes anyone believe that they would not proliferate any new found nuclear technology. It may seem so distant and far off, places like Basra, Al Qaim or Diwaniya. But when the news breaks out of Seattle, Houston or Miami covered in a cloud of radioactive dust, talk of what the Isrealis have or have not done to the Palistieniens will seem a bit insignificant.
  • Philip Andrews on July 15 2012 said:
    Geopolitics I understand. Moralising I do not.

    While I mostly agree with the other reviewer, I can't agree with his 'I don't like the way Iran treats her population, or Israel the Palestinians'.

    Let me clarify; if the West is prepared to 'regime change' in Iran, or Iraq or Afghan in order to impose human rights aka Home Security and Gitmo plus Walmart and spiritual void on them, oh and extraordunary rendituion, why don't we invade Israel to regime change the administration in Jerusalem for one more favourable to the Palestinians? And put Israel under sanctions for having nukes?

    Is it really our business what other countries do internally? It keeps journos in jobs and newspapewrs, thevmedia in business. It keeps armies occupied invading places for 'moralistic reasons?' (if we want to get rid of the Taliban/al-Qaeda, why not also the Saudi Wahhabis...?).

    Western moraklising was confused nonswense in the 19C and its still confused today. What we like about how other countries deal internally is irrelevant. We are not the worlds moral nauthority or policemen. We don't even undwerstand why cultures behave as rthey do. Some journo gets on their high horse (often inspred by govt/commercial agendas) on the moralistic high ground for 2 seconds and everyone is shouting about it. Then trhe spotlight shifts and so does the 'moralistic crowds baying'.

    All to no effect. Nothing has changed fundamebntally in 100+ years. Except that thew moralistic West is in decline, but still shouting its moralistic disapproval as it goes under...

    Moralistic came from 19c Imperial Euro-American Christian and medieval Crusader ethics (we'll teach the heathen to be good Christians or we'll have their heads'). Nowadays its hollow and meaningless. And basically what other countries do internally is none of our business. We can't affect it, improve it or anything else. We just look foolish ultimately and powerless. Better look to our own bckyards...

    And understand geopolitics better
  • Mel Tisdale on July 13 2012 said:
    While Israel is allowed nuclear weapons, no one who supports that state of affairs has any right to deny Iran having them. I don’t like the way the Iranian leadership treats its population. But I like even less the far worse way Israel treats the Palestinians.

    If Israel is so scared of what Iran might be capable of if it had nuclear weapons, then Israel should stop and think how all of its neighbours feel about the nuclear capabilities it already possesses.

    I will believe that Israel wants peace when it stops bullying the Palestinians and disarms its nuclear arsenal. And I will believe the rest of the world wants peace when it forces Israel to comply with the UN resolutions against it, such as building settlements.

    As for Iran building a nuclear submarine, I assume it does not fail to comply with any treaties it might have signed, so why shouldn’t it? O.k., it might be a blatant bargaining chip in its quest to obtain nuclear weapons, but that is a problem the rest of the world created by not sensibly negotiating a route to global nuclear disarmament and then following it. ‘As ye sow, so shall ye reap.’
  • Philip Andrews on July 12 2012 said:
    Just as Iran couldn't build ballistic missiles to hit Israel and she couldn't possibly bring down the US most advanced UAV...

    Apart from the fact that noone in the West seems to KNOW anythung about Irans capblities beyond guesswork, there is an impression that everyone is so paranoid about them trhat reactions vary from the one extreme of 'they're so prmitive they couldn't possibly manage...' to 'OMG they're going to start building nnukes next year - lets destroy Iran tomorrow...'

    If Iran can build ICBMs, launch satellites into space and bring down under control US UAVs, then she has some serious technology capabilities. She might be getting help from the Chinese to build ships and subs. Noone said she would build a nuke sub without assistance.

    Or it could part of the Iranian Game of Bluff.

    We in the West simply don't know and have no way of knowing because we haven't sufficient HUMINT on the ground to make even a half intelligent guess. Where are the modern Robert Baers? We got rid of him/them because he/they were PinC and spoke the reality about ...Saudi. Saudi was not amused...

    Now the West is blind, deaf and dumb to Irans real intentions and stumbling badly. The psychology game is more rthan half the battle, and the Iranians are winning it because they know far more about the West's intentions than the West knows about theirs.

    In the end the West is hostage to Saudi and China. It dances to their tune, with Jerrusalem somewhere in the middle conducting the orchestra.

    What a sad but predictable state of affairs...

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News