• 5 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 6 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 7 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 7 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 8 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 9 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 10 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 11 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 11 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 1 day U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 1 day Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 1 day Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 1 day EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 1 day Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 1 day Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 4 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 4 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 5 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 5 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 5 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 5 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 5 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 6 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 6 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 6 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 7 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 7 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 7 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years

Enbridge Says New Pipeline Regulations Mean Costly Delays

Enbridge says that new requirements expected to come out of a Minnesota environmental impact statement for work on two major U.S. pipeline projects could lead to the delay of some $5 billion in capital expenditure.

At stake are the Sand Piper light crude oil pipeline and the Line 3 Replacement Project, both running through the state of Minnesota and projected to costs a total of $2.6 billion.

The problem for Enbridge is a new requirement that makes it necessary to receive a final environment impact (EIS) statement before a company can even start the process of obtaining a route permit.

Related: Total’s Impressive Earnings And Generous Dividend Surprises Markets

Enbridge says the new requirement is both “unprecedented” and “contrary to Minnesota law”, as reported by the Financial Post. At the end of the day, Enbridge says the new procedures will result in a two-year delay and all the costs associated with that.

The two pipelines will now likely be pushed back to 2019, but the delay will also allow Enbridge to cut its 2016 capital budget by some 20 percent as costs are deferred.

The hold up in Minnesota is pressured by opposition to the pipelines by environmental groups and Native American tribes who fear potential oil leaks.

Related: Why OPEC Production Freeze Could Pave The Way For Actual Cuts

In 2015, Enbridge spent $1.14 billion on new pipelines, expansion and maintenance, while this year that figure is expected to come in around $900 million.

The Sand Piper pipeline, which will run from North Dakota’s Bakken to Wisconsin, passing through Minnesota. This is the larger of the two pipeline projects, and a joint venture with Marathon Petroleum. The Line 3 Replacement is a reconstruction of a 1960s pipeline from Edmonton in Alberta to Wisconsin.

Enbridge has already invested $195 million into Sand Piper and $65 million into the Line 3 Replacement.

By Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Mike H. on February 19 2016 said:
    Enbridge has yet to pay all it's fines for the 2010 Kalamazoo MI massive spill:

    http://insideclimatenews.org/news/19022016/EPA-Enbridge-negotating-fine-2010-Kalamazoo-river-spill-clean-water-act-dilbit

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News