WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

Breaking News:

EIA Report Sees Brent Break $50

Jordan Investing Heavily In Renewables

Jordan Investing Heavily In Renewables

Renewable energy projects in Jordan…

Chinese Demand For Molybdenum Is Up 89.4% This Year

Chinese Demand For Molybdenum Is Up 89.4% This Year

The slowing of Chinese demand…

Is Wall Street Right About Electric Utility Stocks?

Is Wall Street Right About Electric Utility Stocks?

Wall Street analysts tend to…

James Burgess

James Burgess

James Burgess studied Business Management at the University of Nottingham. He has worked in property development, chartered surveying, marketing, law, and accounts. He has also…

More Info

Coal Export Terminal in Oregon Clears Hurdle

On February 11 Ambre Energy received three permits for its proposed coal export terminal in Oregon, clearing a key hurdle. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality issued permits for air quality, water quality, and storm water. Ambre’s terminal would be constructed in Boardman, Oregon, along the Columbia River. Barges would carry coal down the river and transfer the coal to container ships. If completed, the terminal would connect coal from the Powder River Basin in Wyoming and Montana to Asian markets, with a capacity to ship 8.8 million tons of coal per year.

The project is not a certainty at this point, with more permits pending. In fact, the Oregon DEQ is requiring Ambre to obtain a permit that goes above and beyond the normal process. The additional permit will scrutinize the potential pollution of the Columbia River from the export terminal. So although the three approved permits were welcomed by Ambre Energy, the additional environmental review is another unexpected hurdle for the company, and a victory for conservation groups.

Related Article: The Final Piece of The India Coal Boom

The approval comes as other coal export terminals on the West Coast are being delayed or dropped all together. Just last year, Kinder Morgan scrapped its proposed coal export facility at St. Helens. Also, the Port of Coos Bay, which would have had the ability of shipping 11 million tons of coal annually, was cancelled. Ambre Energy’s project at Boardman is one of three remaining projects still in the works, out of an original six. Local opposition has contributed to the failure of these terminals to get off the ground, and opponents of coal exports scored a victory in Washington state last November, electing several anti-coal officials to local office. Al-Jazeera wrote last month about how coal companies, facing stiff opposition in the Pacific Northwest, are turning to the Gulf of Mexico as their next best outlet.

By. James Burgess of Oilprice.com


Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Synapsid on February 12 2014 said:
    Mr Burgess,

    Thanks for this article: concise, informative and accurate.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News