WTI Crude

Loading...

Brent Crude

Loading...

Natural Gas

Loading...

Gasoline

Loading...

Heating Oil

Loading...

Rotate device for more commodity prices

1,300 Mile Bike Path to Turn Keystone XL into Tourist Attraction?

Whilst the Keystone XL pipeline does not make headlines quite as often as it used to, the debate about whether it should be built or not still rages on in the background.

Kinder Baumgarder, the creative director at the SWA Group, the architectural firm that designed Google’s corporate campus, believes that he has a plan that will calm emotions and make people more open to the idea of the pipe.

The SWA Group suggests building a bike lane along the entire length of the pipeline that they claim would become a tourist attraction and turn a controversial eyesore into a thing of beauty.

Keystone XL bike path illustration

According to Bloomberg, on the 17th of October Baumgardner sent a letter to the State Department, and one to TransCanada Corp., explaining his idea, and showing illustrations of happy cyclists travelling along the trail, through Middle America, surrounded by history, culture, and nature.

Related article: Keystone XL: An X-Ray into Obama’s Presidency

Baumgardener claims that the Keystone XL debate had managed to divide opinion at SWA Group, with many in the Texas office supporting it, and those in the California office opposed. He decided to focus his team by asking them: “If it was built, how could you make it better for the population?”

In recent years, as people become more aware of the environment and humanities impact upon it, local governments and officials have worked harder to try and turn eyesores into attractions.
In Texas, SWA is trying to build bike paths under power lines, and it has already created the Buffalo Bayou from a polluted waterway in Houston.

Buffalo Bayou
Buffalo Bayou.

A bike lane along the Keystone XL pipeline, which will stretch 1,300 miles and carry crude oil from the oil sands of Alberta to refineries along the Gulf of Mexico, would be on a much larger scale to other projects.

The idea hasn’t been greeted with the enthusiasm that Baumgardener was perhaps hoping for.

Related article: North Dakota in Spotlight after Oil Spill

Jane Kleeb, the executive director of Bold Nebraska, an environmental activist group against the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, said, “I think it’s ridiculous. Why would anyone who cares about the environment want to ride on top of a pipeline that ruins the environment? The person who developed this is so out of touch with reality.”

And even Shawn Howard, a spokesman for TransCanada, said that, “to make sure we can maintain or access the pipeline, permanent structures couldn’t be built in the easement. We do not own the land that the pipeline easement is for.”

Baumgardner estimates that the entire project, including the construction of the bike lane, facilities along the route, the team of designers, cultural experts, economists, and engineers needed to develop the project, would cost $400 million.

By. Charles Kennedy of Oilprice.com



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Dan on November 02 2013 said:
    Disgraceful how such a light-hearted comment is met with such fierce backlash. People like Kleeb seen too irritable to appreciate this mild though perhaps impractical attempt at bridging opponents. Perhaps a nice long bike ride would calm them down.
  • Hyrum on October 31 2013 said:
    And what would this bikeway be called? The Appeasement Bike Trail? The pipe would still be contributing to increased oil shale production and climate degradation. A bikeway has nothing to do with the point of opposition to the pipeline one way or the other.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News