• 7 hours U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 9 hours Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 11 hours Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 12 hours EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 14 hours Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 15 hours Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 3 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 3 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 3 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 4 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 4 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 4 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 4 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 4 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 4 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 4 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 4 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 4 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 5 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 5 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 5 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 5 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 5 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 5 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 5 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 6 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 6 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 6 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 6 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 6 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 6 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
  • 6 days Record U.S. Crude Exports Squeeze North Sea Oil
  • 6 days Iraq Aims To Reopen Kirkuk-Turkey Oil Pipeline Bypassing Kurdistan
  • 6 days Supply Crunch To Lead To Oil Price Spike By 2020s, Expert Says
  • 7 days Saudi Arabia Ups November Oil Exports To 7-Million Bpd
  • 7 days Niger Delta State Looks To Break Free From Oil
  • 7 days Brazilian Conglomerate To Expand Into Renewables
  • 7 days Kurdish Independence Could Spark Civil War
  • 7 days Chevron, Total Waiting In The Wings As Shell Mulls Majnoon Exit
  • 7 days The Capital Of Coal Is Looking For Other Options
Alt Text

Saudis Lose Market Share To OPEC Rivals

OPEC members Iraq and Iran…

Alt Text

Is Iraq On The Brink Of Civil War?

Kurdistan has dominated Middle Eastern…

Alt Text

Is This The Geopolitical Shift Of The Century?

Saudi Crown Prince bin Salman’s…

Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani

Claude Salhani is the senior editor with Trend News Agency and is a journalist, author and political analyst based in Baku, specializing in the Middle…

More Info

The Israel-Turkey Rift: Is The Future of NATO At Risk?

If anyone still harbored any doubts that there is an urgent need to resolve the Middle East crisis one needs only look at the events that unfolded two weeks ago off the coast of Gaza when Israeli commandos stormed a Turkish relief vessel heading for the besieged Palestinian territory.

The end result of that operation, one which turned out to be a monumental public relations fiasco for Israel, was that it raised the level of animosity between Israel and Turkey, a level which was already dipping well into the red zone – pushing it another notch deeper into the danger zone.

One must not forget that Turkey is a full-fledged member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and that further schism between the Jewish state and a NATO country could have serious implications on the Alliance.

The North Atlantic treaty stipulates very clearly that an attack against one member of the Alliance is equal to an attack on all members. It is this unshakable tenet that has kept Western Europe – and Turkey – safe during the Cold War, acting as a strong deterrence and a reminder to the Warsaw Pact countries that any act of aggression against any member state would be regarded as an act of aggression against the entire Alliance. In essence NATO offered all its members the unwavering support military and political support of the United States of America.

So what would be the consequences in the unfortunate event that Israel found itself in an armed confrontation with Turkey? In which directions would the loyalty of the United States likely to turn? Will the United States respond to the obligations of the NATO charter, one which Washington was instrumental in establishing and rush to defend a country engaged in a military confrontation with a country which every administration has described as America’s staunchest ally in the region, or would the United States risk fracturing NATO and offer assistance to Israel?

This is the dilemma which the Obama administration today could very well face should the situation in the Middle East continue to deteriorate as it has been doing so gradually, ever since the start of this crisis some 60 years ago.

While Israel may have signed peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan and at the same time established commercial relations with a few other Arab nations, the truth of the matter is that those agreements do not establish cordial relations with the people of those countries with which these agreements have been signed. Since Israel exchanged ambassadors with Cairo and Amman how many Egyptians and Jordanians have actually travelled as tourists to Israel?

The answer is a very, very few. Israel may have succeeded in appeasing governments of those two countries, but certainly not made any headway into bridging a huge schism that exists between its people and those of the Arab/Muslim world.  Indeed, if one takes a few steps back and looks at the overall Middle East situation, relations between Israel and other countries in the region have deteriorated. Two prime examples Iran and Turkey.

Before Iran became known as the Islamic Republic after the overthrow of the shah by a theocratic junta led by Ayatollah Khomeini, imperial Iran enjoyed extremely close and cordial relations with Israel. Iran and Israel cooperated on many fronts, not least of them in the military and intelligence fields. It all changed with the Islamic revolution of 1979 and the overthrow of the shah. The consequences of the regime change in Iran have had serious repercussions on Israel and on its security.

Iran today is believed to be supporting, financing, training and equipping groups who are accused by the United States and Israel of engaging in terrorist activities. Under that heading one can place the Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, better known as Hamas and Lebanon’s Hezbollah. Additionally, Iran is believed to be in the process of acquiring nuclear weapons.

Ironically, Iran, a non-Arab country has turned out to be a greater headache for Israel and its security than any other Arab country since the October 1973 War.

Similarly, Turkey, another non-Arab country in the Middle East is on its way to emulate Iran’s militant position vis-à-vis Israel. In the absence of any real Arab political visionary in the Arab Middle East Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, has emerged as a hero in much of the Arab Middle East for his defiant stance against Israel’s politics in the region. To summarize it is obvious that the Arab-Israeli conflict is expanding beyond its traditional borders to now include non-Arab countries.

Should the current trend continue – and there’s no reason to believe it will not, then there is good reason to fear that more countries in the Middle East will get dragged into this imbroglio. After Iran and Turkey will NATO be next?

By Claude Salhani for Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Anonymous on June 16 2010 said:
    Firstly use correct wording, Israeli commandos did not storm the ship. The Israeli navy under international approved law, landed on that ship, after it refusal to allow it to inspect its cargo. Unarmed navy personnel went onboard to be greeted by a mob with crude weapons. There was artillery and assorted war devices onboard, including known terrorists. The only logical and rational solution is a 2 state option, but until Islamist fundamentalist, religious bigots accept this, peace cannot exist. Actually money and education, is not the answer, as we can see with Iran. The answer is Democracy. Freedom and equality for women, choice of sexual orientation, even choice of religion, and non-violent ideas and mentality will dissolve the siege. Turkey has become increasingly right-wing and jihadist, and that is the main source of this new threat of instability in the mid-east. Including mass mis-information, and corrupt governing in Gaza and the West Bank.
  • Anonymous on June 16 2010 said:
    The correct wording was used. Yours (althea) is pure propaganda. Who are these 'known terrorists' and where are the so called 'war devices'. Why were no Israelis killed with these war devices? The truth is that the death devices were held by the Israelis resulting in the murder of 9 unarmed people on boat of humanitarian aid. Israeli actions are despicable as are her defenders. This country has caused nothing but harm to us, and it's time to finally stop giving this rich racist country over 3 billion dollars a year, bombs and military aircraft, and our shameful support. It's time to label the Israel-firsters as they are- Traitors.
  • Anonymous on June 17 2010 said:
    Dear TM, the facts are there for all with clear minds and open eyes to see. And there is not enough space here to respond to all your inacccuracies. I suggest that you present yourself immediately to the nearest psyche ward to treat your paranoid delusions! Yours is clearly a case of projection onto others of your own confusion, hate and anger.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News