• 16 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 17 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 18 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 18 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 19 hours Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 20 hours VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 21 hours Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 22 hours Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 23 hours OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 4 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 5 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 7 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
  • 8 days Over 1 Million Bpd Remain Offline In Gulf Of Mexico
  • 8 days Turkmenistan To Spend $93-Billion On Oil And Gas Sector
  • 8 days Indian Hydrocarbon Projects Get $300 Billion Boost Over 10 Years
Alt Text

Is This The Geopolitical Shift Of The Century?

Saudi Crown Prince bin Salman’s…

Alt Text

Venezuela And Russia Team Up To Tackle The Petrodollar

Maduro has proposed an alternative…

John Daly

John Daly

Dr. John C.K. Daly is the chief analyst for Oilprice.com, Dr. Daly received his Ph.D. in 1986 from the School of Slavonic and East European…

More Info

Pakistan to Tax NATO Transit Supplies?

Consider – every single drop of fuel used by the NATO-led International Security Assistance Forces, largely composed of 90,000 U.S. military troops, must be brought into Afghanistan from outside the country.
But the ISAF troops aren’t the only mouths to feed in Afghanistan, as in 2010 the Pentagon's Central Command put the number of contractors for the U.S. military at 107,000.
For the last two months, not a drop of fuel, munitions or food has been delivered through Pakistan, as following a 26 November NATO aerial assault on two border posts in Mohmand Agency in Pakistan’s turbulent NorthWest Frontier Province that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers, the following day Islamabad promptly sealed its border with Afghanistan to NATO supplies.
Pakistan demanded an immediate apology for the incident.
Islamabad is still waiting, and so the country’s frontier crossings remain shuttered.
Prior to the embargo roughly 100 fuel tanker trucks along with 200 other trucks loaded with NATO supplies crossed into Afghanistan each day from Pakistan’s Torkham and Chaman border crossings.
And now, according to Pakistani port authorities, around 2,000 containers are stacked at Port Qasim in Karachi, while 1,700 containers and a similar number of U.S. military vehicles remain stranded at Karachi’s Kemari harbor.
And the situation is unlikely to change, as last week during a meeting of the Defense Cabinet Committee (DCC), chaired by Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani, decided to keep the supply route closed following a review of the NATO inquiry report into the border “incident.”
Yet in an area of the world where reading between the lines is a fine art, there are hints that NATO’s beleaguered supply lines may soon be open again.
But, it’s apparently gonna cost the alliance.
Defense Minister Chaudhry Ahmad Mukhtar told journalists that the government is considering reopening the supply line but, "If the supplies are resumed, it will not be for free," adding that Pakistan’s roads are damaged by 3,000 containers that pass over them everyday, so "we will charge them (NATO) and repair our roads from these taxes."
Before 2009, almost 70 percent of ISAF’s supplies were shipped to Karachi and trucked through the Khyber Pass border crossings at Torkham and Chaman to Kandahar but when attacks on the convoys increased that year, NATO opened up its Northern Distribution Network (NDN), a railway link running from Latvia’s Riga Baltic port through the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, terminating in Uzbekistan’s Termez on the Afghan border.
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said earlier this month “We are hopeful that our Pakistani partners will reopen the ground supply routes” before adding that currently, supplies are adequate to continue the war effort in Afghanistan due not only to increased traffic on the NDN but increased air shipments of supplies into Afghanistan.
But how much leverage will reopening the supply routes actually give the Pakistani government? According to U.S. officials, now approximately 75 percent of all the logistical supplies for U.S. troops in Afghanistan is now being shipped along the NDN, of which 90 percent crosses into Afghanistan from Uzbekistan’s southern border crossing at Termez. The opening last month of a 47-mile long, $165 million railway line, largely financed by the Asia Development Bank, from Uzbekistan’s Hairatan border town to Afghanistan’s Mazar-e-Sharif is certain to play an increasing role in the shifting of supplies to the NDN network.
The stoppage has left hundreds of Pakistani truck drivers and the thousands involved in the transshipment of the supplies scrambling for alternative work, but the loss of the lucrative contracts have hit them hard, as a lorry driver hauling NATO containers earned about $500 dollars per month, while a non-NATO truck driver would usually be paid only $75-95 each month.
And, in the meantime, the Karachi Port Trust charges $15 per day per container for storage.
Looking down the road – err, railway line, last week China’s state-owned National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) signed a $700 million oil exploration contract with the Afghan government, the first foreign company to do so. Afghanistan’s Mining Minister Wahidullah Shahrani hailed the concord “historic,” noting that it was “the first time that Afghanistan has signed a massive contract for the country’s oil exploration.”
Speaking of railways, in 2007 the 44 percent state-owned China Metallurgical Group (CMG) paid $2.9 billion for the Mes Aynak copper mine in Afghanistan’s Logar province and proposes to build a 500-mile rail line to export the ore to China, and late last year Kabul granted rights to an Indian government-backed steel consortium to develop the 1.8 billion metric ton Hajigak iron ore deposit between Bamyan and Wardak provinces, with the consortium proposing to build a $4.3 billion, 560-mile railway line from Bamyan to Zahedan in Iran, from where ore will be transported back to India..
Western military might making Afghanistan safe for Chinese and Indian businesses - ain’t capitalism wonderful?

By. John C.K. Daly of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News