• 2 hours Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 3 hours Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 hours Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 22 hours Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 22 hours Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 23 hours China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 24 hours UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 1 day Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 1 day VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 1 day Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 1 day Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 1 day OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 2 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 2 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 2 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 2 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 2 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 2 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
  • 5 days Trump Passes Iran Nuclear Deal Back to Congress
  • 5 days Texas Shutters More Coal-Fired Plants
  • 5 days Oil Trading Firm Expects Unprecedented U.S. Crude Exports
  • 5 days UK’s FCA Met With Aramco Prior To Proposing Listing Rule Change
  • 5 days Chevron Quits Australian Deepwater Oil Exploration
  • 5 days Europe Braces For End Of Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Renewable Energy Startup Powering Native American Protest Camp
  • 6 days Husky Energy Set To Restart Pipeline
  • 6 days Russia, Morocco Sign String Of Energy And Military Deals
  • 6 days Norway Looks To Cut Some Of Its Generous Tax Breaks For EVs
  • 6 days China Set To Continue Crude Oil Buying Spree, IEA Says
  • 6 days India Needs Help To Boost Oil Production
  • 6 days Shell Buys One Of Europe’s Largest EV Charging Networks
  • 6 days Oil Throwback: BP Is Bringing Back The Amoco Brand
  • 6 days Libyan Oil Output Covers 25% Of 2017 Budget Needs
  • 6 days District Judge Rules Dakota Access Can Continue Operating
  • 7 days Surprise Oil Inventory Build Shocks Markets
  • 7 days France’s Biggest Listed Bank To Stop Funding Shale, Oil Sands Projects
  • 7 days Syria’s Kurds Aim To Control Oil-Rich Areas
  • 7 days Chinese Teapots Create $5B JV To Compete With State Firms
  • 7 days Oil M&A Deals Set To Rise
  • 7 days South Sudan Tightens Oil Industry Security
Alt Text

Is South America Set For A Gold Rush?

A Chinese gold miner is…

Alt Text

Copper Prices Ignited By Chinese Demand Growth

Copper prices saw some gains…

Alt Text

Will Ecuador’s Mining Sector Return To Its Golden Days?

Despite the recent political problems…

These Closed-Door Discussions Will Change Global Natgas

Critical talks got underway last week, in one of the most important areas on the planet for natural gas development.

British Columbia, Canada.

The province has been the epicentre of a lot of planning recently for mega-projects in liquefied natural gas (LNG). With the big driver here being the ease of shipping natgas from Canada's west coast to key markets in Asia.

But up until now project plans here have remained purely theoretical. With no developer yet taking a final investment decision on the billions in capex required to build an LNG terminal and associated infrastructure.

And the big reason is taxes.

Related: How do you Spend $35 Billion in a Town of 13,000 People?

That's an issue the provincial government is now trying to address. By kicking off discussions on a bill that will define tax terms for LNG developers.

Government spokespeople told the press last Friday that a draft version of the tax bill is expected to be finalized by the week of October 20. The terms will then be open for debate, ahead of finalization of the tax regime expected late in the month.

No details have been given on the numbers the government is looking at in terms of tax rates. But these figures could be key in determining how many LNG projects will go ahead--if any at all.

That's because project developers lately have been voicing their discontent with government policy. After officials earlier this year proposed an initial 1.5% tax rate on LNG production, escalating to 7% after capital costs have been recovered.

Related: Canada’s Shale Boom: More To Come In Montney

High-profile project backers like Malaysia's Petronas have recently said those rates are too high. Threatening to shelve their proposed $10 billion development if the government doesn't lower taxes to a more competitive level.

This could of course simply be posturing from the major. Leaving the government to a challenging decision on whether to heed the warning and drop tax rates--or go ahead with the fiscal regime as planned.

Watch for the final numbers later this month--and the knock-on effects on project planning from big firms.

Here's to putting up the numbers,

Dave Forest

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News