• 1 hour Oil Prices Inch Higher After Surprise Crude Draw
  • 2 hours Kuwait Greenlights Game-Changing Gas Fields Project After Years of Delay
  • 2 hours Minnesota Begins Public Hearings On Enbridge Line 3 Project
  • 3 hours China Looks To Create National Natural Gas Pipeline Firm
  • 3 hours Total Not In A Rush To Sell Canadian Oil Sands Assets
  • 4 hours DOE Seeks To Boost Usage Of Carbon Capture Tech
  • 5 hours Taxpayers Likely To Pick Up The Growing Tab For DAPL Protests
  • 7 hours WTI At 7-Month High On Supply Optimism, Kurdistan Referendum
  • 14 hours Permian Still Holds 60-70 Billion Barrels Of Recoverable Oil
  • 19 hours Petrobras Creditors Agree To $6.22 Billion Debt Swap
  • 23 hours Cracks Emerge In OPEC-Russia Oil Output Cut Pact
  • 1 day Iran Calls On OPEC To Sway Libya, Nigeria To Join Cut
  • 1 day Chevron To Invest $4B In Permian Production
  • 1 day U.S.-Backed Forces Retake Syrian Conoco Gas Plant From ISIS
  • 1 day Iraq Says Shell May Not Quit Majnoon Oilfield
  • 4 days Nigerian Oil Output Below 1.8 Million BPD Quota
  • 4 days Colorado Landfills Contain Radioactive Substances From Oil Sector
  • 4 days Phillips 66 Partners To Buy Phillips 66 Assets In $2.4B Deal
  • 4 days Japan Court Slams Tepco With Fukushima Damages Bill
  • 4 days Oil Spills From Pipeline After Syria Army Retakes Oil Field From ISIS
  • 4 days Total Joins Chevron In Gulf Of Mexico Development
  • 4 days Goldman Chief Urges Riyadh To Get Vision 2030 Going
  • 4 days OPEC Talks End Without Recommendation On Output Cut Extension
  • 5 days Jamaican Refinery Expansion Stalls Due To Venezuela’s Financial Woes
  • 5 days India In Talks to Acquire 20 Percent Of UAE Oilfield
  • 5 days The Real Cause Of Peak Gasoline Demand
  • 5 days Hundreds Of Vertical Oil Wells Damaged By Horizontal Fracking
  • 5 days Oil Exempt In Fresh Sanctions On North Korea
  • 5 days Sudan, South Sudan Sign Deal To Boost Oil Output
  • 5 days Peruvian Villagers Shut Down 50 Oil Wells In Protest
  • 5 days Bay Area Sues Big Oil For Billions
  • 6 days Lukoil Looks To Sell Italian Refinery As Crimea Sanctions Intensify
  • 6 days Kurdistan’s Biggest Source Of Oil Funds
  • 6 days Oil Prices On Track For Largest Q3 Gain Since 2004
  • 6 days Reliance Plans To Boost Capacity Of World’s Biggest Oil Refinery
  • 6 days Saudi Aramco May Unveil Financials In Early 2018
  • 6 days Has The EIA Been Overestimating Oil Production?
  • 6 days Taiwan Cuts Off Fossil Fuels To North Korea
  • 6 days Clash In Oil-Rich South Sudan Region Kills At Least 25
  • 6 days Lebanon Passes Oil Taxation Law Ahead Of First Licensing Auction
Alt Text

Is An Oil Price Spike Imminent?

In the wake of Harvey…

Alt Text

The Boring Truth About Oil Prices

Oil markets look likely to…

Alt Text

Is The Sun Setting On The Solar Boom?

The U.S. solar industry faces…

Morgan Stanley: Oil To Fall To $35 In A Few Weeks

Oil Tanker

Morgan Stanley's Adam Longson has been one of the most bearish sell-side analysts on oil, and overnight he confirmed he isn't going to change his opinion any time soon, and instead warns that while "a profit taking and short covering bounce in oil late in the week has led some to declare that the troubles are behind us" he believes that "very little has been addressed fundamentally to correct these problems. Greater headwinds lay ahead, especially for crude oil. In fact, we would argue that recent price action and developments may have exacerbated the situation." Putting a number to his call: oil will slide to $35 in the next 1-3 months.

The key point in Longson's latest note is a simple, and recurring one: "Fundamental Oil Issues Have Not Been Addressed" and that "Physical market stress due to fundamental headwinds is still ahead."

This is what he says:

A profit taking and short covering bounce in oil late in the week (partly on a US gasoline draw driven by lower imports) has led some to declare that the troubles in oil are behind us. However, while the market began to price in some of the headwinds prematurely via flat price, very little has been addressed fundamentally or through physical market indicators to correct the material problems in oil markets.

Greater headwinds ahead, especially for crude oil. In fact, we could argue that recent price action and developments may have exacerbated the situation.

o The fall in oil prices has only lifted refinery margins, which should support product oversupply: Refinery margins (p.38-39) are not at a level to cause distress or the large run cuts that will be required, despite lower product cracks. The issue is that lower oil, fuel oil and natural gas prices globally reduce operating costs, while a strong USD has lowered general opex and G&A for Europe and Asia on a relative basis.
o A cut in Saudi OSPs reinforces Asian crude oil demand, which should delay necessary run cuts. Asia and the Middle East were the primary incremental contributors to the oversupply in global gasoline and diesel. Expectations had been for Asia to see economic run cuts, but efforts from oil suppliers to support crude demand and refinery margins reduce that probability. Hence, product markets may need to, and are likely, to deteriorate further before corrective actions are taken.
o Returning supply is a boon to refiners. The crude oil oversupply has shifted more refiners to spot purchases where new distressed cargoes can provide opportunities.
o Refiners are reluctant to capitulate. During earnings season, a number of refiners admitted that run cuts may be needed, but few were willing to make economic run cuts themselves. In fact, the global fall maintenance schedule looks surprisingly light at this point. We expect more maintenance or unplanned outages (e.g. Whiting) ahead.

(Click to enlarge)

Separately, US crude oil stats are likely to trend bearish over the coming months. US waterborne imports are likely to stay elevated for 1-2 months given sailing times and prior price signals. However, Canadian supply is returning and refinery demand should fall seasonally (we are past peak runs). With the market trading much more closely on weekly DOE developments, a larger build in US crude oil stocks in Aug or Sep could weigh on sentiment, and WTI time spreads at a minimum.

How does this analysis translate into what happens to the future price of oil, and where Morgan Stanley see oil going next?

The bottom of our trading range remains $35. Although our 4Q16 Brent average is $40, which is an important psychological level, we also provide a trading range for our base case around our forecasts. Despite the recent bounce, we see the prospect for lower prices in the next 1-3 months and a deeper contango. However, we see a soft floor around $35/bbl. There is no intrinsic value or physical market response that will prevent prices from breaking that level, but we see a setup for why the mid-30s could be a critical level. Related: China Could Quadruple Gas Imports By 2030

A rising short position into the mid-30s could make the market more susceptible to OPEC discussion and other headlines. If prices fall to the mid-30s with a large build in short position, it should begin to limit downside risk and provide a soft floor. At such levels, the risk-reward to lower prices is not attractive without a major fundamental change. As a result, investors who have earned profits on their shorts may unwind them or be reluctant to press them in the face of any potential bullish headlines.

The primary catalyst for a short-covering floor would likely be OPEC talk of intervention. Press reports of renewed talks within OPEC are already starting, with Venezuela leading the charge. If prices continue to languish, other producers may be open to the idea, particularly after the market reaction to freeze discussions earlier this year. While some investors may be dismissive of OPEC, the market continues to respond to members’ commentary. Moreover, the probability of some intervention (although still low) rises heading into the Dec 2016 meeting given sustained stress and the full return of Iranian volumes.

(Click to enlarge)

Reaching our $30 Brent average bear case would likely require greater fundamental changes and macro stress. The risk to move below $35 would likely need to come from a large fundamental change (such as Libyan supply returning) and/or macro concerns on top of already poor fundamentals – as we witnessed in Jan 2016. These issues have the potential to change investors’ perception of the rebalancing point, or result in macro positioning liquidation. Within these risks, the probability is rising for a return of Libya, which alone could offset most of the increase in crude oil demand (not refined products) for 2016.

Option positioning and upcoming expiry could be important near term events. We see a notable open interest for Sep WTI puts in the $38-42 range expiring next week. Closing these positions could add some upside buying, while the negative gamma could reinforce any larger down moves by creating forced selling from dealers. Related: This Billionaire Could Change The Resource Industry Forever

As a reminder, Adam was among the first to point out, back on April 26, that oil prices will retrace the pattern observed last year, with a substantial bounce into the summer, and a subsequent, and seasonal, fade heading into the fall and winter.

So far he has been correct.

But if he is also correct about what happens to oil next, there may be a problem, because as JPM pointed out over the weekend, oil sliding below $40 would be not only a breach of a key psychological support level, but also the level below which SWFs would be forced to resume selling equity assets all over again.

By Zerohedge

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Douglas on August 11 2016 said:
    Based on this short term call, we know that Morgan Stanley would like oil to move back down so they can rebuild their positions, before telling us the price is headed back up to 50 and they can sell their spreads into the market. Total manipulation for trading profits. Everyone of these houses (especially MS and GS) are seen for what they are, market manipulators, not oil and gas analysts.
  • Kevin on August 18 2016 said:
    Douglas couldn't be more right. They are not analysts, they are simply the enemy of the small investor. Normally, they would be called "the other side of the trade", but at the end of the day, they really have no redeeming value - other than for their ultra rich clients and themselves. Manipulation sums it up very well...with the hope they can pull in as many suckers as they can - separating you from your money. How are these guys different than the fraudsters who work in boiler rooms???

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News