• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 3 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 12 hours Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 11 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 1 day "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 2 days Bankruptcy in the Industry
  • 2 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Rising Middle East Risk Sparks Fear of $100 Oil

Rising Middle East Risk Sparks Fear of $100 Oil

In case of further escalation,…

Is $100 Oil Within Reach?

Is $100 Oil Within Reach?

We have a situation where…

Arthur Berman

Arthur Berman

Arthur E. Berman is a petroleum geologist with 36 years of oil and gas industry experience. He is an expert on U.S. shale plays and…

More Info

Premium Content

Can WTI Break Out Of The High $40s?

pipelines

The most likely case is that WTI will remain stuck in the upper $40 to lower $50 range through December 2017.

Comparative inventories have fallen dramatically since mid-February yet oil prices languish in the mid-to-upper $40 range. But what will it take for oil prices to break out of the $45 to $55 range?

WTI prices increased from below $45 to almost $55 per barrel based on expectation that OPEC cuts would quickly balance international oil markets and result in near-term higher oil prices. While that expectation lasted, prices remained near $55 from late November 2016 until early March 2017 (Figure 1).

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 1. WTI Prices Have Been Largely Range-Bounded Between $45 and $55/Barrel Since The OPEC-NOPEC Production Cuts. Source: EIA, Bloomberg and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Prices adjusted downward four times between March and August as it became clear that output cuts were not enough to produce a meaningful price recovery. Since mid-August, markets have rallied back to the ~$49 per barrel price average since November.

Tight Oil Rig Counts

Rising rig counts in U.S. tight oil plays have been the most important factor constraining oil prices. Investors fear that resulting increased output will prevent the market from reaching balance.

Rig counts in the Permian basin, Bakken and Eagle Ford plays began increasing after WTI fell below $30 per barrel in early 2016. Since OPEC first suggested the possibility for a production cut in August 2016, tight oil rig counts have more than doubled (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Tight OIl Rig Counts Have Doubled Since Mid-August 2016. Eagle Ford horizontal rig count has fallen the most of the tight oil plays. Source: Baker Hughes and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

While the increase in the number rigs is impressive, the most revealing aspect of Figure 2 is the decline of the Eagle Ford, and the flattening of Permian basin and Bakken rig counts since June. This suggests that the appetite for tight oil plays among equity investors may be moderating.

Despite claims of sub-$40 per barrel break-even prices by Permian basin producers, rig count data indicates that overall play economics require higher prices. The weekly change in Permian rig count suggests that break-even WTI prices may be closer to $55 or $60 per barrel (Figure 3). Break-even prices for some producers are certainly lower but higher prices are required for the average company.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 3. Rig Count Weekly Change Suggests Permian Break-Even Price Is $55-$60/Barrel. Rig Count Rises and Falls on Expectation of $55 to $60 Prices. Source: Baker Hughes, EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Above all, rig count reflects capital flows and the availability of other peoples’ money to fund the tight oil plays—this is critical to production maintenance and growth. Figure 3 shows that capital availability is dependent on expectation of $55 to $60 oil prices. Capital flows have apparently faded with those expectations or else producers are using available capital for other purposes in addition to drilling. Related: In A Bold Move, Saudis Raise Crude Prices For Asia

Comparative Inventory

Comparative inventory (C.I.) fell 117 million barrels (mmb) from mid-February through the end of August (Figure 4).* This is the most significant oil market development since oil prices collapsed in 2014 but it has had little impact on oil prices so far.

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 4. ~4.2 mmb/week (600 kb/d) Decrease in Net Petroleum Product Imports Account For Most Inventory Reductions in 2017. Note: Net imports of petroleum products increased 1.7 mmb for the week ending September 1 because of Hurricane Harvey. Latest data is not included in Figure 4 because it skews net imports based on a weather-related anomaly. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Lower net imports of petroleum products is the main reason for this reduction in C.I. Refinery intakes are at record levels as refiners produce and sell refined products in the U.S. and abroad. As I pointed out last month, this trend is only sustainable if demand for U.S. refined products persists.

While exporting products helps reduce U.S. stocks, it aggravates the global over-supply of liquids. Higher net imports in recent months suggest that this trend may be weakening or ending.

ADVERTISEMENT

Figure 5 shows the magnitude of inventory reductions from mid-February to late August as a “yield curve” of WTI price vs. C.I.

I estimated a range of probable year-end C.I. values to be between 55 and 75 mmb using EIA August STEO inventory forecasts and 2017 inventory decline trends. This range of C.I. translates to December WTI prices between $48 and $51 per barrel. Related: Can Russia Develop Its Shale Reserves?

(Click to enlarge)

Figure 5. Most-Likely December 2017 C.I. Range 55-75 mmb and $48-$51/barrel WTI prices. Source: EIA and Labyrinth Consulting Services, Inc.

Large reductions in C.I. so far have not resulted in meaningful increases in oil prices because the yield curve is fairly flat. That is typical of outsized storage levels.

Oil prices collapsed in 2014 because of excess supply from over-production. Low prices and the contango term structure of forward curves encouraged putting large volumes of crude oil and refined products into storage.

By Art Berman for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • drsaad786 on September 11 2017 said:
    This author is living at least 6months in the past. The contango in Brent has ended and is converted to backwardation. In WTI the contango is just about to change to backwardation. That is why north sea floating storage have reduced dramatically. It will be better if the author would read other articles published I'm the oil price, rather than just promoting the glut propaganda.
  • Robert J. Cravey, Jr. on September 11 2017 said:
    IF a company cannot enjoy a profit margin of 20% on its production then it must settle with
    a reasonable reduction of expenses. Remove the insatiable greed, as demonstrated by
    exxon moble at the pump and the volume increase trade off will supply that 20% profit margin
    enjoyment. Be content with what your company is earning or simply quit the business.
  • Brandon on September 11 2017 said:
    Oil glut is over, with global demand well above production and increasing at a rate of 1.5 Mbpd a year. Growth rate in oil demand in past two years 2016 + 2017 is greater than oil production of an entire OPEC country like Venezuela. And the latter is even failing.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News