follow us like us subscribe contact us
Adbar

US Shale Revolution, Staggering Global Potential

By Jen Alic | Wed, 19 June 2013 22:05 | 3

The US may be the only country undergoing a shale revolution, but it doesn’t have the biggest shale oil and gas reserves in the world.

The global shale oil and gas potential is a staggering 345 billion barrels of oil and 7.2 quadrillion cubic feet of natural gas, according to a new report from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Topping the list for shale oil is Russia, with 75 billion barrels—compared to the US’ 48 billion—and China with 32 billion barrels, trailed by Argentina in third with 27 billion barrels and Libya.

For shale gas, outside of the US, the line-up has China on top, followed by Argentina, Algeria, Canada and Mexico. The US comes in fourth, after Algeria, for shale gas resources.

But in terms of developing shale resources, no one comes close to the US, which corners the market on the shale drilling technology.

Related article: Shale, Gales, and Tipping the Scales

“American oil and gas production has seen an unprecedented boom over the past several years, reversing decades of steady decline in output. This revival has come thanks in part to the introduction of new engineering solutions to help tap into the country's unconventional oil and gas deposits and in part to the high prices that have made these techniques economical,” the report said.

What’s different about this report is that it has in the past only considered US shale resources, not global resources, so now we have a bigger picture. But US resource estimates have also been upped in this latest report to 48 billion barrels of oil—up from 32 billion in 2011—and to 7,299 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, up from 6,622 Tcf in 2011.

So while there is definitely growing interest in tapping into global shale resources, for now there is little chance of replicating another “revolution” outside the US.

Canada has seen a great deal of investment into shale drilling technologies. For 2012, Canada’s tight oil production averaged 291,498 barrels per day, while shale gas production was 0.7 trillion cubic feet.

Poland has been a bit of a disappointment. It was the lone wolf among European countries in that it was enthusiastic about allowing hydraulic fracturing but exploration results were not what were expected and initial estimates of reserves were lowered. ExxonMobil, Canada’s Talisman and Marathon have all picked up stakes here.

Related article: Frackers Under Scrutiny for Buying Silence

Then we have Algeria, which was one of the focal points of the EIA’s report, which noted that Algeria’s shale gas estimates had tripled from the initial 231 Tcf of 2011 to 707 Tcf.  This is what Europe is eyeing zealously, because it’s easy to get to Europe and could supply the European Union for a decade.

Algeria is also being spotlighted because the government took measures earlier this year to attract more investors specifically to its shale plays, with profits-based taxes to replace gross income taxes and long-term licensing to reduce some of the exploration risk.

One of the biggest things keeping investors away from Algeria’s unconventional exploration opportunities has been the tax regime—specifically the windfall tax on hydrocarbons. In February, Algiers removed this tax with a new hydrocarbons law. Royalty fees will now be adjusted based on production levels, and taxes on revenues will take into consideration exploration difficulty and risk.

By. Jen Alic of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
Jen Alic
Company: ISA Intel

More recent articles by Jen Alic

Sun 18 August 2013
Egypt, Take III: No End to the Carnage
Thu 15 August 2013
Iraqi Oil Exports Slump But Optimism Abounds
Thu 15 August 2013
E.ON Sees First-Half Profit Slump in Europe
Tue 13 August 2013
Will Moribund Uranium Prices Rebound?
Sun 11 August 2013
BG Group Gets US LNG Export Approval

Leave a comment

  • Joseph A Olson on June 20 2013 said:
    We have been force fed a trifecta of Carbon LIES by agenda driven, federal funding. First is the Carbon climate 'forcing' fraud. It is physically impossible for the less than three cubic miles of human produced CO2 to control the temperature of 259 trillion cubic miles of mostly molten rock at average 2500F and 310 million cubic miles of ocean at average 40F. Every form of 'sustainable' energy requires more INPUT energy to create, than is produced in the service live. Wind mills, solar cells and bio-fuels all CONSUME more energy than they produce.

    But the PEAK lie, is 'peak' oil. Hydrocarbons are naturally produced throughout the solar system, the Milky Way Galaxy and the entire Universe. It is the elemental atoms released by fission that produce the feedstock for this natural system.

    See "Fracturing the Fossil Fuel Fable" at the Principia-Scientific.org website.
  • Tom on June 20 2013 said:
    How do you find what stock to invest in when it comes to fracking?
  • Jon Latey on June 23 2013 said:
    The possibilities are boundless once you factor in all the possible hydrocarbon and nuclear resources that have been overlooked until now.

Leave a comment