follow us like us subscribe contact us
Adbar

Is Paranoia Driving Fracking Fears?

By Daniel J. Graeber | Wed, 20 March 2013 23:23 | 3

Around 100 people crammed into a tiny community center in West Michigan this week for a town hall meeting on hydraulic fracturing.  Michigan ranks 15th in the nation in terms of natural gas reserves, with its Antrim play in the northern Lower Peninsula producing around 126 billion cubic feet per year in 2009. Overseas, residents in Lancashire, in northwest England, are keeping their own eye on developments as so-called fracking operations are set to resume after a brief hiatus. Energy company Cuadrilla is targeting an area that holds more than twice the amount of shale natural gas than is presumably left in northern Michigan. The state lawmaker who convened the meeting said there are no plans for the controversial practice in the region. Residents, however, expressed concern about the practice, fueling the debate over just what's driving the growing concerns over shale.

Cuadrilla Resources is targeting an estimated 300 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the Bowland basin in northwest England. So-called fracking operations were halted there when small tremors were linked to initial testing in 2011. With an early-warning system in hand, the company now expects it's the only one in the country using technology that's already put the United States in a leadership position in terms of natural gas reserves. Lancashire residents and government officials alike have expressed concern about Cuadrilla's plans given that, for the most part, regional oil and gas campaigns have focused on offshore developments. Nevertheless, George Osborne, the British finance minister, said the government was banking on the shale potential.

Related article: Chevron Hits Australian Shale Gas Market in $349m Farm-In

"I want Britain to tap into new sources of low-cost energy like shale gas," he said. "Shale gas is part of the future. And we will make it happen."

A subsidiary of Canadian energy company Encana Corp. (NYSE: ECA) in 2010 said there was a "meaningful" amount of natural gas in the Collingwood-Utica shale play in Michigan. Much of that is situated in the northern Lower Peninsula. The Antrim play in the same region gave up 126 billion cubic feet of natural gas in 2009, though the U.S. Energy Department said that play is in decline.

In October, oil and gas companies shelled out $2.5 million for Michigan leases during the state's last auction. Another round is set for May. State Rep. Lisa Posthumus Lyons, a Republican, welcomed around 100 people to a town hall forum in Ada Township, a tiny upscale suburb of Grand Rapids and home to holding company Alticor. There, state geology and environmental officials explained that Michigan has perhaps the strongest laws on the books regarding hydraulic fracturing. Lyons, who received campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry, said fracking isn't going on in Ada and "we don’t expect it to go on anytime soon."

Related article: Algeria: Leveling the Playing Field for Shale Gas Exploration

State leaders explained to residents the verdict was still out on the shale gas potential in western Michigan. If any were to occur, officials said the state has regulations ranging from post-drilling remediation to water protection that should allay most concerns. While there are no guarantees, they said, issues like earthquakes are exceedingly rare. Overseas, Cuadrilla officials said they're going above and beyond safety requirements used already in the United States, though even that did little to quiet the critics.  Michigan officials got a similar reception despite saying there were no documented cases where fracking caused environmental damage in the state.  Concerns over new and high-profile technologies are likely to stir a public reaction. But just like fears that cell phones can cause fires at gasoline stations, it's a matter of contention whether some of the concerns over fracking are valid or a simple case of public paranoia.

By. Daniel J. Graeber of Oilprice.com

About the author

Contributor
Daniel J. Graeber
Company: Oilprice.com
Position: Senior Analyst

More recent articles by Daniel J. Graeber

Thu 17 April 2014
Putin is Losing Eastern European Energy Gamble
Wed 16 April 2014
Private Sector Driving U.S. Wind Market Forward
Tue 15 April 2014
Why Angola may be the next OPEC Darling
Mon 14 April 2014
U.S. Gas Prices Rise, but not because of Global Factors
Sun 13 April 2014
Eastern Europe has Nothing on Asian Energy Markets

Leave a comment

  • Bill Newton on March 21 2013 said:
    There are many more concerns than those listed in the article. The chemicals used in the fracking fluids, which end up in the water table are many and very insidious. The gas released through the fracking process does not magically migrate directly to the well casing. It is randomly released and makes its way to the surface and into water sources.
    The health issues are manifold and many are yet to realised.
    Another instance of big business wanting their obscene profit at our expense.
  • Peter M on March 21 2013 said:
    I'm not sure if 'paranoia' is the right way to phrase it. Spills can, do, and are occurring: http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22817087/parachute-creek-spill-continues-uncontained-cause-source-unknown

    I would say that it should be more of whether communities are willing to accept the risks.
  • Panskeptic on March 23 2013 said:
    The earthquakes stopped in Ohio when the fracking did. Even paranoids have enemies.

Leave a comment